Measuring shear strength of soft-tissue adhesives

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 100 B, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 618-623

  Wang, Muzhou ^a   Kornfield, Julia A ^a  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

hydrogel; rheometer; stress; tissue adhesion; torsion

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE BOND; CORNEAL STROMA; CYANOACRYLATES; LAP-SHEAR TEST; QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT; RING TEST; SIMPLE SHEAR; SOFT BIOLOGICAL TISSUE; SOFT TISSUE; TISSUE ADHESION; TORSIONAL LOADINGS;

ADHESION; ADHESIVES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RHEOMETERS; STRESSES; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TORSIONAL STRESS;

HYDROGELS;

CYANOACRYLATE; GELATIN; MACROGOL; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOMEDICINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA STROMA; GEOMETRY; HYDROGEL; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SKIN; SOFT TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; CYANOACRYLATES; HYDROGELS; MATERIALS TESTING; SHEAR STRENGTH; SWINE; TISSUE ADHESIVES;

EID: 84862822824     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31981     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Lauto A, Mawad D, Foster LJR,. Adhesive biomaterials for tissue reconstruction. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2008; 83: 464-472. (Pubitemid 351460910)
2. Peng HT, Shek PN,. Novel would sealants: Biomaterials and applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010; 7: 639-659.
3. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Hollander JE,. The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26: 490-496. (Pubitemid 351503692)
4. Spotnitz WD, Burks S,. Hemostats, sealants, and adhesives: Components of the surgical toolbox. Transfusion 2008; 48: 502-516.
5. Oelker AO, Grinstraff MW,. Ophthalmic adhesives: A materials chemistry perspective. J Mater Chem 2008; 18: 2521-2536.
6. Evans MDM, McLean KM, Hughes TC, Sweeney DF,. A review of the development of a synthetic corneal onlay for refractive correction. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 464-472.
7. Beebe DJ, Moore JS, Bauer JM, Yu Q, Liu RH, Devadoss C,. Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 2000; 404: 588-590. (Pubitemid 30205053)
8. Kinloch AJ,. Adhesion and Adhesives: Science and Technology. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
9. Park K, Park H,. Test methods of bioadhesion. In:, Lenaerts V, Gurny R, editors. Bioadhesive Drug Delivery Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1989. pp 43-64.
10. ASTM Standard F2255-05, 2005. Standard test method for strength properties of tissue adhesives in lap-shear by tension loading. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA; 2005.
11. Sierra DH, Feldman DS,. A method to determine shear adhesive strength of fibrin sealants. J Appl Biomater 1992; 3: 147-151.
12. Chen TH, Janjua R, McDermott MK, Bernstein SL, Steidl SM, Payne GF,. Gelatin-based biomimetic tissue adhesive. Potential for retinal reattachment. J Biomed Mater Res 2006; 77: 416-422. (Pubitemid 43667465)
13. Volkersen O,. Die nietkraftverteilung in zugbeanspruchten nietverbindungen mit konstanten laschenquerschnitten. Luftfahrtforschung 1938; 15: 41-47.
14. Goland M, Reissner E,. The stresses in cemented joints. J Appl Mech 1944; 11: A17-A27.
15. Adams RD, Peppiatt NA,. Effect of Poisson's ratio strains in adherends on stressed in an idealised lap joint. J Strain Anal 1973; 8: 134-139.
16. Sitterle VB, Sun W, Levenston ME,. A modified lap test to more accurately estimate interfacial shear strength for bonded tissues. J Biomech 2008; 41: 3260-3264.
17. Adams RD, Coppendale J, Peppiatt NA,. Stress analysis of axisymmetric butt joints loaded in torsion and tension. J Strain Anal 1978; 13: 1-10. (Pubitemid 8605054)
18. Adams RD, Comyn J, Wake WC,. Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.
19. Chai H,. Deformation and failure of adhesive bonds under shear loading. J Mater Sci 1993; 28: 4944-4956.
20. Bryant RW, Dukes WA,. The measurement of the shear strength of adhesive joints in torsion. Br J Appl Phys 1965; 16: 101-108.
21. Zanni-Deffarges MP, Shanahan MER,. Evaluation of adhesive shear modulus in a torsional joint: Influence of ageing. Int J Adhes Adhes 1993; 13: 41-45.
22. Bernard L, Doyle J, Friedlander SF, Eichenfield LF, Gibbs NF, Cunningham BB,. A prospective comparison of octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Dermabond) and suture for the closure of excisional wounds in children and adolescents. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137: 1177-1180. (Pubitemid 32847839)
23. Vote BJT, Elder MJ,. Cyanoacrylate glue for corneal perforations: A description of a surgical technique and a review of the literature. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 28: 437-442. (Pubitemid 32050932)
24. Wallace DG, Cruise GM, Rhee WM, Schroeder JA, Prior JJ, Ju J, Maroney M, Duronio J, Ngo MH, Estridge T, Coker GC,. A tissue sealant based on reactive multifunctional polyethylene glycol. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 58: 545-555. (Pubitemid 32899911)
25. Nickerson CS, Park J, Kornfield JA, Karageozian H,. Rheological properties of the vitreous and the role of hyaluronic acid. J Biomech 2008; 41: 1840-1846.
26. Mahdavi A, Ferreira L, Sundback C, Nichol JW, Chan EP, Carter DJD, Bettinger CJ, Patanavanich S, Chignozha L, Ben-Joseph E, Galakatos A, Pryor H, Pomerantseva I, Masiakos PT, Faquin W, Zumbuehl A, Hong S, Borenstein J, Vacanti J, Langer R, Karp JM,. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 2307-2312. (Pubitemid 351520509)
27. Sierra DH,. Fibrin sealant adhesive systems: A review of their chemistry, material properties and clinical applications. J Biomater Appl 1993; 7: 309-352.
28. de Moura MR, Guilherme MR, Campese GM, Radovanovic E, Rubira AF, Muniz EC,. Porous alginate-Ca2+ hydrogels interpenetrated with PNIPAAm networks: Interrelationship between compressive stress and pore morphology. Eur Polym J 2005; 41: 2845-2852. (Pubitemid 41427176)
29. Sah RLY, Doong JYH, Grodzinsky AJ, Plaas AHK, Sandy JD,. Effects of compression on the loss of newly synthesized proteoglycans and proteins from cartilage explants. Arch Biochem Biophys 1991; 286: 20-29.
30. Thomas W,. Catch bonds in adhesion. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2008; 10: 39-57.
31. Whitfield M, Thomas WE,. A nanoadhesive composed of receptor-ligand bonds. J Adhes 2011; 87: 427-446.
32. McDermott MK, Chen TH, Williams CM, Markley KM, Payne GF,. Mechanical properties of biomimetic tissue adhesives based on the microbial transglutaminase-catalyzed crosslinking of gelatin. Biomacromolecules 2004; 5: 1270-1279. (Pubitemid 39089726)
33. Sierra DH, Eberhardt AW, Lemons JE,. Failure characteristics of multiple-component fibrin-based adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 59: 1-11.
34. Nakayama Y, Matsuda T,. Photocurable surgical tissue adhesive glues composed of photoreactive gelatin and poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 48: 511-521. (Pubitemid 29337228)
35. Degoricija L, Johnson CS, Wathier M, Kim T, Grinstaff MW,. Photo cross-linkable biodendrimers as ophthalmic adhesives for central lacerations and penetrating keratoplasties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 2037-2042. (Pubitemid 351261272)
36. Grinstaff MW,. Designing hydrogel adhesives for corneal wound repair. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 5205-5214. (Pubitemid 47532199)
37. Sehl LC, Trollsas OM, Wallace DG, Toman D, DeLustro FA, Schroeder JA, Chu GH,. Methods for tissue repair using adhesive materials. U.S. Pat. #6,833,408 B2, 2004.
38. Ishihara M, Nakanishi K, Ono K, Sato M, Kikuchi M, Saito Y, Yura H, Matsui T, Hattori H, Uenoyama M, Kurita A,. Photo-crosslinkable chitosan as a dressing for wound occlusion and accelerator in healing process. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 833-840. (Pubitemid 33108958)
39. Mackel MJ,. Measuring hydrogel friction with a stress rheometer. Hydrophobic polymers in gels and solutions: Surface properties and structure. Doctoral thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2008.
40. Kim SH, Marmo C, Somorjai GA,. Friction studies of hydrogel contact lenses using AFM: Non-crosslinked polymers of low friction at the surface. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3285-3294. (Pubitemid 32923334)
41. Graiver D, Durall RL, Okada T,. Surface-morphology and friction coefficient of various types of Foley catheter. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 465-469. (Pubitemid 23164190)
42. Kavehpour HP, McKinley GH,. Tribo-rheometry: From gap-dependent rheology to tribology. Tribol Lett 2004; 17: 327-335. (Pubitemid 38865476)