Comparison of two adsorbents for the removal of pentavalent arsenic from aqueous solutions

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 98-106

  Li, Qin ^a   Xu, XiaoTian ^a   Cui, Hao ^a   Pang, Jianfeng ^a   Wei, ZhongBo ^a   Sun, Zengqing ^a   Zhai, Jianping ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Arsenic removal; Fly ash cenospheres; Magnesia loaded fly ash cenospheres; Manganese loaded fly ash cenospheres

Indexed keywords

ADSORBENTS; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; FLY ASH; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; IONIC STRENGTH; MAGNESIA; MANGANESE; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; MANGANESE REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); POTASH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPECTROMETRY; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

ARSENIC REMOVAL; FLY ASH CENOSPHERES; MAGNESIA-LOADED FLY ASH CENOSPHERE; MANGANESE-LOADED FLY ASH CENOSPHERE; MIXED SOLUTION; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; WET IMPREGNATION; X RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY;

ADSORPTION;

ADSORBENT; ARSENIC; MAGNESIA LOADED FLY ASH CENOSPHERE; MANGANESE LOADED FLY ASH CENOSPHERE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARSENIC; CHLORIDE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FLY ASH; ION; MANGANESE; PH; PHOSPHATE; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; X-RAY;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED PHOTOACOUSTIC SPECTROSCOPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; IONIC STRENGTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER RECYCLING; X RAY DIFFRACTION; X RAY FLUORESCENCE;

EID: 84862776616     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Altundogan H.S., et al. Arsenic removal from aqueous by adsorption on red mud. Waste Manage. 2000, 20(8):761-767.
2. Anirudhan T.S., Jalajamony S. Cellulose-based anion exchanger with tertiary amine functionality for the extraction of arsenic(V) from aqueous media. J.Environ. Manage. 2010, 91(11):2201-2207.
3. Budinova T., et al. Biomass waste-derived activated carbon for the removal of arsenic and manganese ions from aqueous solutions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255(8):4650-4657.
4. Chakravarty S., et al. Removal of arsenic from groundwater using low cost ferruginous manganese ore. Water Res. 2002, 36(3):625-632.
5. Chang Y.Y., Song K.H., Yang J.K. Removal of As(III) in a column reactor packed with iron-coated sand and manganese-coated sand. J.Hazard. Mater. 2008, 150(3):565-572.
6. Chen W.F., et al. Arsenic removal by iron-modified activated carbon. Water Res. 2007, 41(9):1851-1858.
7. Do D.D. Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria and Kinetics 1998, Imperial College Press, London, UK.
8. Emamjomeh M.M., Sivakumar M. Review of pollutants removed by electrocoagulation and electrocoagulation/flotation processes. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90(5):1663-1679.
9. Eren E. Removal of copper ions by modified Unye clay, Turkey. J.Hazard. Mater. 2008, 159(2-3):235-244.
10. Fagarassy E., et al. Treatment of high arsenic content wastewater by membrane filtration. Desalination 2009, 240(1-3):270-273.
11. Faust S.D., Winka A.J., Belton T. Assessment of chemical and biological significant of arsenical species in the Maurice River drainage basin (N.J). Part I. Distribution in water and river and lake sediments. J.Environ. Sci. Health A 1987, 22:203-237.
12. Ferguson J.F., Gavis J. Review of the arsenic cycle in natural waters. Water Res. 1972, 6:1259-1274.
13. Greenleof J.E., Lin J., Sengupta A.K. Two novel applications of ion exchange fibres: arsenic removal and chemical-free softening of hard water. Environ. Prog. 2006, 25:300-311.
14. George C.M., et al. Reverse osmosis filter use and high arsenic levels in private well water. Arch. Environ. Health 2006, 61:171-175.
15. Guell R., et al. Modelling of liquid-liquid extraction and liquid membrane separation of arsenic species in environmental matrices. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 72(3):319-325.
16. Ho Y.S., McKay G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34:451-465.
17. Holl W.H. Mechanisms of arsenic removal from water. Environ. Geochem. Health 2010, 32(4):287-290.
18. Jang M., et al. Removal of arsenite and arsenate using hydrous ferric oxide incorporated into naturally occurring porous diatomite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40(5):1636-1643.
19. Jeong Y., et al. Evaluation of iron oxide and aluminum oxide as potential arsenic(V) adsorbents. Chem. Eng. Process 2007, 46:1030-1039.
20. Jimenez-Cedillo M.J., Olguin M.T., Fall C. Adsorption kinetic of arsenates as water pollutant on iron, manganese and iron-manganese-modified clinoptilolite-rich tuffs. J.Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163(2-3):939-945.
21. Kim M.J., Nriagu J., Haack S. Arsenic species and chemistry in groundwater of southeast Michigan. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 120(2):379-390.
22. Lakshmipathiraj P., et al. Adsorption studies of arsenic on Mn-substituted iron oxyhydroxide. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2006, 304(2):317-322.
23. Langmuir I. The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 38:2221-2295.
24. 2 and water. J.Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173:675-681.
25. Li Y.R., et al. Arsenic removal from aqueous solution using ferrous based red mud sludge. J.Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177(1-3):131-137.
26. Liu R.P., et al. Arsenic removal through adsorption, sand filtration and ultrafiltration: In situ precipitated ferric and manganese binary oxides as adsorbents. Desalination 2009, 249(3):1233-1237.
27. Manna A.K., et al. Removal of arsenic from contaminated ground water by solar-driven membrane distillation. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:805-811.
28. Medina A., et al. Fly ash from a Mexican mineral coal. II. Source of W zeolite and its effectiveness in arsenic(V) adsorption. J.Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181(1-3):91-104.
29. 3+ impregnated activated carbon. J.Hazard. Mater. 2008, 150(3):695-702.
30. National Research Council (NRC) Arsenic in Drinking Water 1999, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
31. Pal P., et al. Removal of arsenic from drinking water by chemical precipitation-a modelling and simulation study of the physical-chemical processes. Water Environ. Res. 2007, 79:357-366.
32. Penrose W.R. Arsenic in the marine and aquatic environments; analysis, occurrence and significance. CRC Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 1974, 4:465-482.
33. Sen A.K., De A.K. Adsorption of arsenic on coal fly ash. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 1987, 25:259-261.
34. Schaeffer R., et al. Determination of arsenic species in seafood samples from the Aegean Sea by liquid chromatography-(photo-oxidation)-hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 547(1):109-118.
35. Smedley P.L., Kinniburgh D.G. Areview of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17(5):517-568.
36. Turk T., Alp I., Deveci H. Adsorption of As(V) from water using Mg-Fe-based hydrotalcite (FeHT). J.Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171(1-3):665-670.
37. USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) 2009, US Environmental Protection Agency.
38. Van Halem D., et al. Subsurface arsenic removal for small-scale application in developing countries. Desalination 2009, 248(1-3):241-248.
39. Walker M., Seiler R.L., Meinert M. Effectiveness of household reverse-osmosis systems in a Western US region with high arsenic in groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 389(2-3):245-252.
40. Weber W.J. Physico-chemical Process for Water Quality Control 1972, Wiley Interscience Publication, New York.
41. World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, First Addendum to Third Edition 2006, vol. 1. Recommendations, Geneva.
42. Zhang F.S., Hideaki I. Iron oxide-loaded slag for arsenic removal from aqueous system. Chemosphere 2005, 60(3):319-325.
43. Zhang G.S., et al. Preparation and evaluation of a novel Fe-Mn binary oxide adsorbent for effective arsenite removal. Water Res. 2007, 41(9):1921-1928.