Investigation of bacterial community in activated sludge with an anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) to decrease the generation of excess sludge

Water Research

Volumn 46, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 4292-4300

  Kim, Young Mo ^a,c   Chon, Dong Hyun ^a   Kim, Hee Sik ^b   Park, Chul ^a  

^a University of Massachusetts Amherst   (United States)

^b Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)   (South Korea)

^c Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science   (United States)

Author keywords

Activated sludge; Anaerobic side stream reactor (ASSR); Decreasing excess sludge production; DGGE; Microbial community

Indexed keywords

AEROBIC BACTERIA; ELECTROPHORESIS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; DGGE; EXCESS SLUDGE PRODUCTION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; SIDE STREAMS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BACTERIOLOGY; BACTERIUM; BIOREACTOR; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; GENETIC VARIATION; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; OXIC CONDITIONS; PHYLOGENETICS; SEWAGE TREATMENT;

ACTINOBACTERIA; ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATION; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ANAEROBIC SIDE STREAM REACTOR; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; CHLOROFLEXI; CLOSTRIDIALES; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOBACTERIA; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPIROCHETE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ACTINOBACTERIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CHLOROFLEXI; CHLOROFLEXI (CLASS); CLOSTRIDIALES; FUSCONAIA SUBROTUNDA; PROTEOBACTERIA; SPIROCHAETES;

EID: 84862761291     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.040     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alawi M., Off S., Kaya M., Spieck E. Temperature influences the population structure of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009, 1:184-190.
2. Chen G.-H., Yip W.-K., Mo H.-K., Liu Y. Effect of sludge fasting/feasting on growth of activated sludge cultures. Water Res. 2001, 35:1029-1037.
3. Chon D.-H., Rome M., Kim H.-S., Park C. Investigating the mechanism of sludge reduction in activated sludge with an anaerobic side-stream reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63(1):93-99.
4. Chon D.-H., Rome M., Kim Y.M., Park K.Y., Park C. Investigation of the sludge reduction mechanism in the anaerobic side-stream reactor process using several control biological wastewater treatment processes. Water Res. 2011, 45:6021-6029.
5. Devikarani M.R., Thiruvenkatachari V. Strategies for sludge minimization in activated sludge process - a review. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 2005, 14:2-12.
6. Duan L., Moreno-Andrade I., Huang C.L., Xia S., Hermanowicz S.W. Effects of short solids retention time on microbial community in a membrane bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:3489-3496.
7. Dunbar J., Ticknor L.O., Kuske C.R. Phylogenetic specificity and reproducibility and new method for analysis of terminal restriction fragment profiles of 16S rRNA genes from bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67:190-197.
8. Goel R.K., Noguera D.R. Evaluation of sludge yield and phosphorus removal in a Cannibal solids reduction process. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 2006, 132:1331-1337.
9. Grady C.P.L., Daigger G.T., Lim H.C. Biological Wastewater Treatment 1999, Marcel Dekker, New York. N.Y. second ed.
10. Holt J., Krieg N., Sneath P., Staley J., Williams S. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 1994, Williams and Wilkins. ninth ed.
11. Huang L.N., De Wever H., Diels L. Diverse and distinct bacterial communities induced biofilm fouling in membrane bioreactors operated under different conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8360-8366.
12. Johnson B.R., Daigger G.T., Novak J.T. The use of ASM based models for the simulation of biological sludge reduction processes. Water Practice and Technol 2008, 3:3-11.
13. Kamiya T., Hirotsuji J. New combined system of biological process and intermittent ozonation for advanced wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38:145-153.
14. Kim Y.M., Lee D.S., Park C., Park D., Park J.M. Effects of free cyanide on microbial communities and biological carbon and nitrogen removal performance in the industrial activated sludge process. Water Res. 2011, 45:1267-1279.
15. Liu Y., Tay J.H. Strategy for minimization of excess sludge production from the activated sludge process. Biotechnol. Adv 2001, 19:97-107.
16. Masse A., Sperandio M., Cabassud C. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res. 2006, 40:2405-2415.
17. Mayhew M., Stephenson T. Low biomass yield activated sludge: a review. Environ. Technol. 1997, 18:883-892.
18. Novak J.T., Chon D.H., Curtis B., Doyle M. Biological solids reduction using the Cannibal process. Water Environ. Res. 2007, 79(12):2380-2386.
19. Park C., Novak J.T. Characterization of activated sludge exocellular polymers using several cation-associated extraction methods. Water Res. 2007, 41:1679-1688.
20. Park C., Novak J.T. Characterization of lectins and bacterial adhesins in activated sludge flocs. Water Environ. Res. 2009, 81:755-764.
21. Pérez-Elvira S.I., Nieto Diez P., Fdz-Polanco F. Sludge minimisation technologies. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2006, 5:375-398.
22. Pholchan M.K., Baptista J.C., Davenport R.J., Curtis T.P. Systematic study of the effect of operating variables on reactor performance and microbial diversity in laboratory-scale activated sludge reactors. Water Res. 2010, 44:1341-1352.
23. Rittmann B., McCarty P. Environmental Biotechnology: Principles and Application 2001, McGraw Hill, NY.
24. Saby S., Djafer M., Chen G.-H. Feasibility of using a chlorination step to reduce excess sludge in activated sludge process. Water Res. 2002, 36:656-666.
25. Saby S., Djafer M., Chen G.-H. Effect of low ORP in anoxic sludge zone on excess sludge production in oxic-settling-anoxic activated sludge process. Water Res. 2003, 37:11-20.
26. Servin J., Herbold C., Skophammer R., Lake J. Evidence excluding the root of the tree of life from the. Actinobacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25:1-4.
27. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1963, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
28. Shin S.G., Han G., Lim J., Lee C., Hwang S. A comprehensive microbial insight into two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste-recycling wastewater. Water Res. 2010, 44:4838-4849.
29. Sun L., Randall C.W., Novak J.T. The influence of sludge interchange times on the oxic-settling-anoxic process. Water Environ. Res. 2010, 82(6):519-523.
30. Wang J., Zhao Q. Microbial community analysis on oxic-settling-anaerobic process by using PCR-DGGE assay. Adv. Mat. Res. 2011, 255-260:2934-2939.
31. Ward J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58:236-244.
32. Wei Y., Van Houten R.T., Borger A.R., Eikelboom D.H., Fan Y. Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2003, 37:4453-4467.