Surgical management of a suspicious adnexal mass: A systematic review

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 149-156

  Covens, Allan L ^a   Dodge, Jason E ^b   Lacchetti, Christina ^c   Elit, Laurie M ^c   Le, Tien ^d   Devries Aboud, Michaela ^e   Fung Kee Fung, Michael ^d,f  

^a DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY   (Canada)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^e Guelph Family Health Team   (Canada)

^f CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adnexal mass; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Lymphadenectomy; Surgical management

Indexed keywords

ADNEXA DISEASE; ADNEXAL MASS; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; LITERATURE; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MEDLINE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RUPTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADNEXAL DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84862756303     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: 10956859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.018     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Canadian Cancer Society's Steering Committee. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2010 Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2010.
2. Myers E, Bastian L, Havrilesky L, Kulasingam S, Terplan M, Cline K, et al. Management of adnexal mass. Contract no.: evidence report/technology assessment no.: 130AHRQ publication no.: 06-E004. Contract no.: 290-02-0025. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Feb. 2006.
3. Browman G, Levine M, Mohide E, Hayward R, Pritchard K, Gafni A. The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:502-12.
4. Australian Cancer Network, National Breast Cancer Centre. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Camperdown, Australia: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2004.
5. Statacorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009.
6. Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK, Husain A, Teng NN, Berek JS, et al. Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109(1):12-9. (Pubitemid 46043192)
7. Chan J, Fuh K, Shin J, Cheung M, Powell C, Chen L, et al. The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress? Br J Cancer 2008;98(7):1191-6. (Pubitemid 351481684)
8. Cho Y-H, Kim D-Y, Kim J-H, Kim Y-M, Kim K-R, Kim Y-T, et al. Is complete surgical staging necessary in patients with stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian tumors? Gynecol Oncol 2006;103(3):878-82. (Pubitemid 44821308)
9. Hornung R, Urs E, Serenella E, Edward W, Ursula S, Urs H, et al. Analysis of potential prognostic factors in 111 patients with ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett 2004; 206(1):97-106. (Pubitemid 38281259)
10. Maggioni A, Benedetti Panici P, Dell'Anna T, Landoni F, Lissoni A, Pellegrino A, et al. Randomised study of systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the pelvis. Br J Cancer 2006;95(6): 699-704. (Pubitemid 44373484)
11. Oksefjell H, Sandstad B, Trope C. Is the watch and wait approach adequate after comprehensive surgical staging in invasive stage I epithelial ovarian cancer? The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2008;29(6): 583-9.
12. Skirnisdottir I, Sorbe B. Lymph node sampling is of prognostic value in early stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2005;26(2):181-5. (Pubitemid 40546528)
13. Suzuki S, Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Ino K, Nawa A, Sakakibara K, et al. Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients? Ann Oncol 2008;19(7):1284-7. (Pubitemid 351911958)
14. Wong HF, Low JJH, Chua Y, Busmanis I, Tay EH, Ho TH. Ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy: a review of 247 patients from 1991 to 2004. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17(2):342-9. (Pubitemid 46426778)
15. Desfeux P, Camatte S, Chatellier G, Blanc B, Querleu D, Lecuru F. Impact of surgical approach on the management of macroscopic early ovarian borderline tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2005;98(3):390-5. (Pubitemid 41169149)
16. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bergamini V, Tomera S, Franchi M, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the surgical management of apparent early stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105(2):409-13. (Pubitemid 46590334)
17. Lecuru F, Desfeux P, Camatte S, Bissery A, Blanc B, Querleu D. Impact of initial surgical access on staging and survival of patients with stage I ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16(1):87-94.
18. Park JY, Bae J, Lim MC, Lim SY, Seo SS, Kang S, et al. Laparoscopic and laparotomic staging in stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparison of feasibility and safety. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008;18(6):1202-9.
19. Romagnolo C, Gadducci A, Sartori E, Zola P, Maggino T. Management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of an Italian multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101(2):255-60.
20. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors: the role of fertility-sparing surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113(1):75-82.
21. Yinon Y, Beiner ME, Gotlieb WH, Korach Y, Perri T, Ben-Baruch G. Clinical outcome of cystectomy compared with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as fertilitysparing treatment of borderline ovarian tumors. Fertil Steril 2007;88(2):479-84. (Pubitemid 47212145)
22. Geomini P, Bremer G, Kruitwagen R, Mol BWJ. Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96(1):1-9. (Pubitemid 39612409)
23. Medeiros L, Rosa D, Edelweiss M, Stein A, Bozzetti M, Zelmanowicz A, et al. Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumours: a systematic review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:192-202. (Pubitemid 40396952)
24. Naik R, Cross P, Lopes A, Godfrey K, Hatem MH. "True" versus "apparent" stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: value of frozen section analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16(Suppl. 1):41-6.
25. Boriboonhirunsarn D, Sermboon A. Accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2004;30(5):394-9. (Pubitemid 39318793)
26. Brun J-L, Cortez A, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M, Uzan S, et al. Factors influencing the use and accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(3) 244.e1-7.
27. Wootipoom V, Dechsukhum C, Hanprasertpong J, Lim A. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian tumors. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89(5): 577-82. (Pubitemid 43763881)
28. Yarandi F, Eftekhar Z, Izadi-Mood N, Shojaei H. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;48(4): 438-41.
29. BazotM, Nassar-Slaba J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Darai E.MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology. Eur Radiol 2006;16(12):2687-99. (Pubitemid 44823922)
30. Ghaemmaghami F, Fakour F, Karimi Zarchi M, Behtash N, Modares Gilani M, Mousavi A, et al. Clinical assessment, gross examination, frozen section of ovarian masses: do patients benefit? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;278(3):209-13.
31. Wasinghon P, Suthippintawong C, Tuipae S. The accuracy of intraoperative frozen sections in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. J Med Assoc Thai 2008;91(12): 1791-5.
32. Ilvan S, Ramazanoglu R, Ulker Akyildiz E, Calay Z, Bese T, Oruc N. The accuracy of frozen section (intraoperative consultation) in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol 2005;97(2):395-9. (Pubitemid 40614880)
33. Stewart CJR, Brennan BA, Hammond IG, Leung YC, McCartney AJ. Intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a 5-year review with assessment of discrepant diagnostic cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2006;25(3):216-22. (Pubitemid 44610033)
34. Geomini P, Zuurendonk LD, Bremer GL, de Graaff J, Kruitwagen R, Mol BW. The impact of size of the adnexal mass on the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis. Gynecol Oncol 2005;99(2):362-6. (Pubitemid 41502845)
35. Fanfani F, Zannoni GF, Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Masciullo V, Testa AC, et al. Importance of a specialized pathologist for the examination of frozen sections of adnexal masses. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17(5):1034-9. (Pubitemid 47414825)
36. Tangjitgamol S, Jesadapatrakul S, Manusirivithaya S, Sheanakul C. Accuracy of frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004;14(2): 212-9. (Pubitemid 38533890)
37. Taskiran C, Erdem O, Onan A, Bozkurt N, Yaman-Tunc S, Ataoglu O, et al. The role of frozen section evaluation in the diagnosis of adnexal mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008;18(2):235-40. (Pubitemid 351365227)
38. Canis M, Mashiach R, Wattiez A, Botchorishvili R, Rabischong B, Jardon K, et al. Frozen section in laparoscopic management of macroscopically suspicious ovarian masses. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11(3):365-9. (Pubitemid 39195584)
39. Reeves BC, Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, GA W. Chapter 13: Including non-randomized studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated 2009 Sep]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2009. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
40. Park JY, Kim DY, Suh DS, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, et al. Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in surgical staging of early-stage ovarian and fallopian tubal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15(7):2012-9.
41. Trimbos B, Timmers P, Pecorelli S, Coens C, Ven K, van der Burg M, Casado A. Surgical staging and treatment of early ovarian cancer: long-term analysis from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(13):982-7.
42. Lehner R, Wenzl R, Heinzl H, Husslein P, Sevelda P. Influence of delayed staging laparotomy after laparoscopic removal of ovarian masses later found malignant. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92(6):967-71. (Pubitemid 28536112)
43. Iglesias DA RP. Role of minimally invasive surgery in staging ovarian cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2011;12:217-29.
44. Vergote I, De Brabander J, Fyles A, Bertelsen K, Einhorn N, Sevelda P, et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2001;357:176-82. (Pubitemid 32108089)
45. Fauvet R, Boccara J, Dufournet C, Poncelet C, Darai E. Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study. Ann Oncol 2005;16(3):403-10. (Pubitemid 40458316)
46. Zanetta G, Rota S, Chiari S, Bonazzi C, Bratina G, Mangioni C. Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2658-64. (Pubitemid 32441370)
47. Donnez J, Munschke A, Berliere M, Pirard C, Jadoul P, Smets M, et al. Safety of conservative management and fertility outcome in women with borderline tumors of the ovary. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1216-21. (Pubitemid 36547864)
48. Tinelli R, Tinelli A, Tinelli FG, Cicinelli E, Malvasi A. Conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors: a review. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100(1):185-91. (Pubitemid 41815071)
49. Gol M, Baloglu A, Yigit S, Dogan M, Aydin C, Yensel U. Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of ovarian tumors: is there a change in the course of time? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13:593-7. (Pubitemid 38222599)
50. Tempfer CB, Polterauer S, Bentz E-K, Reinthaller A, Hefler LA. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis in borderline tumors of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 96 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2007;107(2):248-52. (Pubitemid 47575720)