A time-motion economic analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in ambulatory surgery

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 366-375

  Parra Sanchez, Ivan ^a   Abdallah, Rania ^a   You, Jing ^a   Fu, Alex Z ^a   Grady, Martin ^a   Cummings, Kenneth ^a   Apfel, Christian ^b   Sessler, Daniel I ^a,c  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTION; NAUSEA AND VOMITING; NURSING CARE; POSTANESTHESIA CARE; POSTDISCHARGE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; TIME; TREATMENT DURATION;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; QUALITY OF LIFE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84862754826     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: 14968975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-011-9660-x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Gan TJ, Meyer TA, Apfel CC, et al. Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2007; 105: 1615-28. (Pubitemid 350190555)
2. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 652-8. (Pubitemid 29409815)
3. Junger A, Klasen J, Benson M, et al. Factors determining length of stay of surgical day-case patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 314-21. (Pubitemid 32417797)
4. Hedayati B, Fear S. Hospital admission after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1999; 83: 776-9. (Pubitemid 29502059)
5. Carroll NV, Miederhoff P, Cox FM, Hirsch JD. Postoperative nausea and vomiting after discharge from outpatient surgery centers. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 903-9.
6. Kovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs 2000; 59: 213-43. (Pubitemid 30168508)
7. Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 693-700. (Pubitemid 29418651)
8. Tang J, Watcha MF, White PF. A comparison of costs and efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol as prophylactic antiemetic therapy for elective outpatient gynecologic procedures. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 304-13. (Pubitemid 26255822)
9. Hill RP, Lubarsky DA, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiemetic therapy with ondansetron, droperidol, or placebo. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 958-67. (Pubitemid 30180971)
10. Tang J, Wang B, White PF, Watcha MF, Qi J, Wender RH. The effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 274-82. (Pubitemid 28079475)
11. Lachaine J. Therapeutic options for the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a pharmacoeconomic review. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24: 955-70. (Pubitemid 44497468)
12. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 89-91.
13. Martin CG, Rubenstein EB, Elting LS, Kim YJ, Osoba D. Measuring chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis. Cancer 2003; 98: 645-55.
14. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Cost-utility analysis. In: Drummond MF, editor. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 137-209.
15. Littenberg B, Partilo S, Licata A, Kattan MW. Paper Standard Gamble: the reliability of a paper questionnaire to assess utility. Med Decis Making 2003; 23: 480-8. (Pubitemid 37448913)
16. Ross PL, Littenberg B, Fearn P, Scardino PT, Karakiewicz PI, Kattan MW. Paper standard gamble: a paper-based measure of standard gamble utility for current health. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003; 19: 135-47. (Pubitemid 36356334)
17. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Chung KP, Huang C, Chen CY. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 337-44.
18. van Wijck EE, Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Time-tradeoff values and standard-gamble utilities assessed during telephone interviews versus face-to-face interviews. Med Decis Making 1998; 18: 400-5. (Pubitemid 28465281)
19. Red Book 2009: Pharmacy's Fundamental Reference(Red Book Drug Topics). Montvale, NJ: Physicians' Desk Reference Inc., 2009: 1-1032.
20. Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant T, Gardner S. Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2000.
21. Habib AS, Chen YT, Taguchi A, Hu XH, Gan TJ. Postoperative nausea and vomiting following inpatient surgeries in a teaching hospital: a retrospective database analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22: 1093-9. (Pubitemid 44000730)
22. Gan TJ, Sloan F, de L Dear G, El-Moalem HE, Lubarsky DA (2001) How much are patients willing to pay to avoid postoperative nausea and vomiting? Anesth Analg 92: 393-400. (Pubitemid 32127625)
23. Kerger H, Turan A, Kredel M, et al. Patients' willingness to pay for anti-emetic treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 38-43. (Pubitemid 44968022)
24. Dexter F, Tinker JH. Analysis of strategies to decrease postanesthesia care unit costs. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 94-101.
25. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory Surgery in the United States, 2006. National Health Statistics Reports 2009; 11: 1-28. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr011.pdf (accessed November 2011).
26. Frighetto L, Loewen PS, Dolman J, Marra CA. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic dolasetron or droperidol vs rescue therapy in the prevention of PONV in ambulatory gynecologic surgery. Can J Anesth 1999; 46: 536-43. (Pubitemid 29327678)
27. Chang P, Okamoto M, Chen J, Frame D. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ondansetron and prochlorperazine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. J Manag Care Pharm 2005; 11: 317-21.