Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: Comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm 2) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm 2)

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 198-205

  Kitajima, Kazuhiro ^a   Takahashi, Satoru ^a   Ueno, Yoshiko ^a   Yoshikawa, Takeshi ^a   Ohno, Yoshiharu ^a   Obara, Makoto ^b   Miyake, Hideaki ^a   Fujisawa, Masato ^a   Sugimura, Kazuro ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 Tesla MRI; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); high b value; prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84862747622     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23627     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E,. Cancer statistics, 2010. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277-300.
2. Egevad L, Granfors T, Karlberg L, Bergh A, Stattin P,. Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer. BJU Int 2002; 89: 538-542. (Pubitemid 34948295)
3. Rajinikanth A, Manoharan M, Soloway CT, Civantos FJ, Soloway MS,. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years. Urology 2008; 72: 177-182.
4. Sato C, Naganawa S, Nakamura T, et al. Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 21: 258-262. (Pubitemid 40280120)
5. Kim CK, Park BK, Han JJ, Kang TW, Lee HM,. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 T for differentiation of malignant and benign tissue in transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 449-454 (Pubitemid 46849917)
6. Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 720-726.
7. Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Kuroda K, Sugimura K,. High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: Effect of signal-to-noise ratio. Magn Reson Med Sci 2008; 7: 93-99.
8. Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B,. High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3T to detect prostate cancer: Comparison between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: W33-W37.
9. Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T, et al. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3T for prostate cancer: Tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. Radiology 2011; 259: 775-784.
10. Verma S, Rajesh A, Morales H, et al. Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 374-381.
11. Turkbey B, Shah V, Pang Y, et al. Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? Radiology 2011; 258: 488-495.
12. Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman H, et al. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 2011; 259: 453-461.
13. Itou Y, Nakanishi K, Narumi Y, Nishizawa Y, Tsukuma H,. Clinical Utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in patients with prostate cancer: Can ADC values contribute to assess the aggressiveness of prostate cancer? J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 167-172.
14. Kitajima K, Kaji Y, Fukabori Y, Yoshida K, Suganuma N, Sugimura K,. Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 625-631.
15. Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, Hung YP, Rybicki FJ, Maier SE, Tempany CMC,. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 563-568. (Pubitemid 43776563)
16. Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tanimoto A, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 27: 353-359.
17. Bourne R, Kurniawan N, Cowin G, Sved P, Watson G,. 16 T diffusion microimaging of fixed prostate tissue: Preliminary findings. Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 66: 244-247.
18. Riches SF, Hawtin K, Charles-Edwards EM, de Souza NM,. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modeled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients. NMR in Biomed 2009; 22: 318-325.