Pollen-mediated gene flow from Coreopsis tinctoria to Coreopsis leavenworthii: Inheritance of morphological markers and determination of gene flow rates as affected by separation distances

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 173-179

  Smith, Sarah M ^a   Deng, Zhanao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Asteraceae; Interspecific hybridization; Seed wing; Spotted ray flower; Trichome

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862731595     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.137.3.173     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beckie, H.J. and L.M. Hall. 2008. Simple to complex: Modeling crop pollen-mediated gene flow. Plant Sci. 175:615-628.
2. Brewbaker, J.L. 1957. Pollen cytology and self-incompatibility systems in plants. J. Hered. 48:271-277.
3. Bryant, B. and B.L. Harper-Lore. 1997. Where wildflowers bloom, so does hope. 20 June 2011.http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/97novdec/p97nov38.cfm.
4. Clewell, A.F. 1985. Guide to the vascular plants of the Florida panhandle. University Press of Florida, Tallahassee, FL.
5. Ellstrand, N.C. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: Implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77-86.
6. Ellstrand, N.C., H.C. Prentice, and J.F. Hancock. 1999. Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:539-563.
7. Havens, K. 1998. The genetics of plant restoration: An overview and a surprise. Restor. Manage. Notes 16:68-72.
8. Kabat, S.M., J.G. Norcini, and B. Dehgan. 2007. Temperature and light affects germination ecology of commercially produced seed of leavenworth's coreopsis (Coreopsis leavenworthii). Native Plants J. 8:235-247.
9. Laikre, L., M.K. Schwartz, R.S. Waples, N. Ryman, and The GeM Working Group. 2010. Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: Unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:520-529.
10. Largiadèr, C.R. 2007. Hybridization and introgression between native and alien species. Biol. Invasions 193:275-292.
11. Levin, D.A. 1981. Dispersal versus gene flow in plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 68:233-253.
12. Markwardt, D. 2005. Texas roadside wildflowers. Native Plants J. 6:69-71.
13. Parker, H.M. 1973. A biosystematic study of section Calliopsis of Coreopsis Compositae). PhD diss., Univ. of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR.
14. Rogers, D.L. 2004. Genetic erosion-No long just an agricultural issue. Native Plants J. 5:112-122.
15. Rogers, D.L. and A.M. Montalvo. 2004. Genetically appropriate choices for plant materials to maintain biological diversity. Univ. of California. Report to the U.S. Dept. Agr. Forest Serv., Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, CO.
16. Sharma, J.N. 1971. The genetics, nature and occurrence of self-incompatibility and cross-incompatibility in four annual species of Coreopsis L. PhD. diss., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT.
17. Smith, E.B. 1976. A biosystematic survey of Coreopsis in eastern United States and Canada. SIDA Contrib. Bot. 6:123-215.
18. Smith, E.B. and H.M. Parker. 1971. A biosystematic study of Coreopsis tinctoria and C. cardaminefolia (Compositae). Brittonia 23:161-170.
19. Texas Department of Transportation. 2011. Wildflower facts. 20 June 2011. http://www.txdot.gov/public_involvement/wildflowers/facts.htm.
20. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2011. Plants database. 7 July 2011. http://plants.usda.gov/java/nameSearch?keywordquery=coreopsis+leavenworthii&mode=sciname&submit.x=0&submit.y=0.
21. Wunderlin, R.P. 1998. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida.University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
22. Wunderlin, R.P. and B.F. Hansen. 2004. Atlas of Florida vascular plants. 7 May 2011. http://www.plantsatlas.usf.edu.