The humanities and/in HCI

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1135-1138

  Bardzell, Jeffrey ^a   Bardzell, Shaowen ^a   DiSalvo, Carl ^b   Gaver, William ^c   Sengers, Phoebe ^d  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

arts; critical theory; design; humanities; reflective hci

Indexed keywords

ARTS; CRITICAL THEORY; HUMANITIES; INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH AGENDA; STATE OF THE ART;

DESIGN; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 84862700843     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2212776.2212405     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bardzell, J. 2009. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In CHI '09. 2357-2366.
2. Bardzell, S. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In CHI '10, 1301-1310.
3. Bell, G., M. Blythe, & P. Sengers. 2005. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technology." ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12, 2, 149-173. (Pubitemid 43891471)
4. Boehner, K., R. DePaula, P. Dourish, & P. Sengers. 2007. How emotion is made and measured. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, April 2007, 275-291.
5. Boehner, K., J. Vertesi, P. Sengers, & P. Dourish. 2007. How HCI interprets the probes. In CHI '07, 1077-1086.
6. DiSalvo, C., P. Sengers, & H. Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In CHI '10. 1975-1984.
7. Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. In CHI '06, 541-550.
8. Flanagan, M. & H. Nissenbaum. 2007. A game design methodology to incorporate social activist themes. In CHI '07, 181-190.
9. Gaver, B., T. Dunne, E. Pacenti. Jan./Feb. 1999. Cultural probes, interactions, v.6 n.1, p.21-29,
10. Gaver, W., M. Blythe, A. Boucher, N. Jarvis, J. Bowers, and P. Wright. 2010. The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality. In CHI '10, 2055-2064.
11. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Law, A., Pennington, S., Bowers, J., Beaver, J., Humble, J., Kerridge, T., Villar, N., and Wilkie, A. (2008). Threshold devices: Looking out from the home. Proc. of CHI'08.
12. Irani, L., J. Vertesi, P. Dourish, K. Philip, and R. E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In CHI '10. 1311-1320.
13. Kannabiran, G., J. Bardzell, & S. Bardzell. 2011. How HCI talks about sexuality: Discursive strategies, blind spots, and opportunities for future research. In CHI '11, 695-704.
14. Latulipe, C., Carroll, E., and Lottridge, D. Exploring the Measurement and Use of Audience Engagement Data in the Performing Arts. In CHI '11.
15. McCarthy, J. and P. Wright. 2004. Technology as Experience. The MIT Press.
16. Sengers, P. & B. Gaver. 2006. Staying open to interpretation: Engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In DIS '06. 99-108.
17. Suchman, L. 2002. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 14, 2, 91-105.
18. Sundström, P., Ståhl, A., Höök, K. (2005). eMoto- Affectively involving both body and mind. Proc. of CHI'05.
19. Taylor, A.S. 2011. Out there. In CHI '11, 685-694.