Institutional dynamics of project-based creative organizations: Irving Thalberg and the Hollywood studio system

Advances in Strategic Management

Volumn 28, Issue , 2011, Pages 445-466

  Lampel, Joseph ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862700610     PISSN: 07423322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028020     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1992). Forging the iron cage: Interorganizational networks and the production of macro-culture. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 175-194
2. Blomquist, T., & Packendorff, J. (1998). Learning from renewal projects: Content, context and embeddedness. In: R. A. Lundin & C. Midler (Eds.), Projects as arenas for renewal and learning processes. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Bowser, E. (1990). The transformation of cinema, 1907-1915. University of California Press.
4. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
5. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
6. Engwall, M. (2003). No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context. Research Policy, 32, 789-808.
7. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-266). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8. Friedrich, O. (1997). City of nets: A portrait of Hollywood in the 1940's. University of California Press.
9. Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 196-214.
10. Gomery, D. (1986). The Hollywood studio system. Palgrave Macmillan.
11. Grabher, G. (2004). Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1491-1514.
12. Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521-539.
13. Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship by elite firms in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27-48.
14. Hamel, G., & Prahlad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67, 63-76.
15. Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: P. J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organization Analysis (pp. 204-231). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Lampel, J.,&Shamsie, J. (2003). Capabilities inmotion: New organizational forms and the reshaping of the Hollywood movie industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2189-2210.
18. Lindkvist, L. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 3-25.
19. Macgowan, K. (1965). Behind the screen: The history and techniques of the motion picture. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.
20. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657-679.
21. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2008). Strategy safari: The complete guide through the wilds of strategic management. Pearson/FT Press.
22. Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 160-197.
23. Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257-272.
24. Morris, P., & Jamieson, A. (2004). Translating corporate strategy into project strategy: Realizing corporate strategy through project management. Newton Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
25. Schatz, T. (1996). The genius of the system: Hollywood filmmaking in the studio era. Henry Holt and Company.
26. Shenhar, A. J.,&Dvir, D. (2004).Howprojects differ, andwhat todoabout it. In: P.W.G.Morris& J. K. Pinto (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 1265-1286). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
27. Staiger, J. (1985). The Hollywood mode of production to 1930. In: D. Bordwell, J. Staiger & K. Thompson (Eds.), The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style and mode of production to 1960 (pp. 85-153). London: Routledge.
28. Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L., & DeFillippi, R. (2004). Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: Editorial. Organization Studies, 25, 1475-1489.
29. Sydow, J., & Staber, U. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television. Regional Studies Special Issue, 36(3), 215-227.
30. Thiry, M., & Deguire, M. (2007). Recent developments in project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 25(7), 649-658.
31. Thomas, B. (2000). Thalberg: Life and legend. Beverly Hills, CA: New Millennium Press.
32. Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801-843.
34. Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. (1999). The Versatile project-based organisation: Governance and operational control. European Management Journal, 17(3), 296-309.
35. Vieira, M. A. (2009). Irving Thalberg: Boy wonder to producer prince. University of California Press.
36. Wijnberg, N. M., & Gemser, G. (2000). Adding value to innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the selection system in visual arts. Organization Science, 11(3), 323-329.