메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 65-72

A Comprehensive Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment in Drug Development

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG APPROVAL; DRUG MARKETING; DRUG SYNTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 84862669055     PISSN: 17427835     EISSN: 17427843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2012.00871.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (8)

References (23)
  • 1
    • 84862689069 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The future of drug safety - promoting and protecting the health of the public. (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The future of drug safety - promoting and protecting the health of the public. 2007 (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • (2007)
  • 2
    • 84862651510 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identifying CDER's Science and Research Needs Report - The CDER Science Prioritization and Review Committee (SPaRC). (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • Identifying CDER's Science and Research Needs Report - The CDER Science Prioritization and Review Committee (SPaRC). 2011 (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • (2011)
  • 3
    • 84862692040 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • FDA: PDUFA V. (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • FDA: PDUFA V. 2011 (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • (2011)
  • 4
    • 84862683907 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Report of the CHMP working group on benefit-risk assessment models and methods. EMEA/CHMP/15404/2007. CHMP; (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Report of the CHMP working group on benefit-risk assessment models and methods. EMEA/CHMP/15404/2007. CHMP; 2008 (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • (2008)
  • 5
    • 84862692039 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). Working CIOMS Group IV - benefit-risk balance for marketed drugs: evaluating safety signals. (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). Working CIOMS Group IV - benefit-risk balance for marketed drugs: evaluating safety signals. 1998 (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • (1998)
  • 6
    • 78951480226 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Refining the benefit-risk framework for the assessment of medicines: valuing and weighting benefit and risk parameters
    • Walker S, Liberti L, McAuslane N. Refining the benefit-risk framework for the assessment of medicines: valuing and weighting benefit and risk parameters. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89:179-82.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.89 , pp. 179-182
    • Walker, S.1    Liberti, L.2    McAuslane, N.3
  • 7
    • 78951486644 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Progress on the development of a benefit/risk framework for evaluating medicines
    • Liberti L, McAuslane N, Walker S. Progress on the development of a benefit/risk framework for evaluating medicines. Reg Focus 2010;25:1-6.
    • (2010) Reg Focus , vol.25 , pp. 1-6
    • Liberti, L.1    McAuslane, N.2    Walker, S.3
  • 8
    • 84862692041 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benefit-risk methodology project - work package 2 report: applicability of current tools and processes for regulatory benefit-risk assessment. EMA/549682/2010. European Medicines Agency (EMA); (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • Benefit-risk methodology project - work package 2 report: applicability of current tools and processes for regulatory benefit-risk assessment. EMA/549682/2010. European Medicines Agency (EMA); 2010 (last accessed on 06 March 2012).
    • (2010)
  • 9
    • 77955391449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group
    • Guo JJ, Pandey S, Doyle J, Bian B, Lis Y, Raisch DW. A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group. Value Health 2010;13:657-66.
    • (2010) Value Health , vol.13 , pp. 657-666
    • Guo, J.J.1    Pandey, S.2    Doyle, J.3    Bian, B.4    Lis, Y.5    Raisch, D.W.6
  • 10
    • 0141839142 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benefit-risk analysis: a brief review and proposed quantitative approaches
    • Holden WL. Benefit-risk analysis: a brief review and proposed quantitative approaches. Drug Saf 2003;26:853-62.
    • (2003) Drug Saf , vol.26 , pp. 853-862
    • Holden, W.L.1
  • 11
    • 34547543016 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines - part 1: the development of a new model using multi-criteria decision analysis
    • Mussen F, Salek S, Walker S. A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines - part 1: the development of a new model using multi-criteria decision analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16(Suppl. 1):S2-15.
    • (2007) Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf , vol.16 , Issue.SUPPL. 1
    • Mussen, F.1    Salek, S.2    Walker, S.3
  • 12
    • 59549098910 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A multiattribute model for evaluating the benefit-risk profiles of treatment alternatives
    • Felli JC, Noel RA, Cavazzoni PA. A multiattribute model for evaluating the benefit-risk profiles of treatment alternatives. Med Decis Making 2009;29:104-15.
    • (2009) Med Decis Making , vol.29 , pp. 104-115
    • Felli, J.C.1    Noel, R.A.2    Cavazzoni, P.A.3
  • 14
    • 78149362118 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis
    • Nutt DJ, King LA, Phillips L. Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis. Lancet 2010;376:1558-65.
    • (2010) Lancet , vol.376 , pp. 1558-1565
    • Nutt, D.J.1    King, L.A.2    Phillips, L.3
  • 15
    • 29444454480 scopus 로고
    • R&D Portfolio selection by using qualitative pairwise comparisons
    • Dyk EV, Smith DG. R&D Portfolio selection by using qualitative pairwise comparisons. OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S 1990;18:583-94.
    • (1990) OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S , vol.18 , pp. 583-594
    • Dyk, E.V.1    Smith, D.G.2
  • 16
    • 33847394408 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems
    • Løken E. Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007;11:1584-95.
    • (2007) Renew Sustain Energy Rev , vol.11 , pp. 1584-1595
    • Løken, E.1
  • 20
    • 0001072895 scopus 로고
    • The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial
    • Clopper C, Pearson E. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika 1934;26:404-13.
    • (1934) Biometrika , vol.26 , pp. 404-413
    • Clopper, C.1    Pearson, E.2
  • 22
    • 60349086809 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of a clinical utility index to compare insomnia compounds: a quantitative basis for benefit-risk assessment
    • Ouellet D, Werth J, Parekh N, Feltner D, McCarthy B, Lalonde RL. The use of a clinical utility index to compare insomnia compounds: a quantitative basis for benefit-risk assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;85:277-82.
    • (2009) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.85 , pp. 277-282
    • Ouellet, D.1    Werth, J.2    Parekh, N.3    Feltner, D.4    McCarthy, B.5    Lalonde, R.L.6
  • 23
    • 35148895216 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to improve complex drug development? A critical review of FDA advisory meetings
    • Boudes PF. How to improve complex drug development? A critical review of FDA advisory meetings. Drug Inf J 2007;41:673-83.
    • (2007) Drug Inf J , vol.41 , pp. 673-683
    • Boudes, P.F.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.