Research status and characteristics of library and information science in Taiwan: A bibliometric analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-21

  Lin, Wen Yau Cathy ^a  

^a TAMKANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Journal article; Library and information science (LIS); Research project; Research status; Taiwan; Thesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862667817     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0725-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blessinger, K., & Frasier, M. (2007). Analysis of a decade in library literature: 1994-2004. College & Research Libraries, 68(2), 155-169.
2. Bonnevie, E. (2003). A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: the case of the Journal of Information Science. Journal of Information Science, 29(1), 11-23.
3. Bonnevie-Nebelong, E., & Frandsen, T. F. (2006). Journal citation identity and journal citation image: A portrait of the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 30-57.
4. Buttlar, L. (1999). Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 227-245.
5. Cano, V. (1999). Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(8), 675-680.
6. De Moya Anegón, F., Jiménez Contreras, E., & De La Moneda Corrochano, M. (1998). Research fronts in library and information science in Spain (1985-1994). Scientometrics, 42(2), 229-246.
7. Franklin, R. E., & Jaeger, P. T. (2007). A decade of doctorates: An examination of dissertations written by African American women in library and information studies, 1993-2003. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 48(3), 187-201.
8. Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461-473.
9. He, S., & Spink, A. (2002). A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 953-959.
10. Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1990). Content-analysis of research articles in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 12(4), 395-421.
11. Kajberg, L. (1996). A content analysis of library & information science serial literature published in Denmark, 1957-1986. Library and Information Science Research, 18(1), 25-52.
12. Khoo, C. S. G. (2011). Towards an Asia vision of library and information research. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 37(2), 4-19.
13. Li, J., Sanderson, M., Willett, P., Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2010). Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgments. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 554-563.
14. Lin, W.-Y. C. (2004). Journal article publication patterns of librarians in Taiwan. University Library Journal, 8(1), 167-192. (in Chinese).
15. Lo, S. C., Chen, K. H., & Lin, C. J. (2001). The study of framework of subject classification for journal articles in Library and Information Science. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 16, 185-208. (in Chinese).
16. Meho, L. I., & Spurgin, K. M. (2005). Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1314-1331.
17. Nisonger, T. E. (1999). JASIS and library and information science journal rankings: A review and analysis of the last half-century. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(11), 1004-1019.
18. Ouyang, J. C., Kuan, C., Tung, C. H., & Shiue, J. F. (2006). The status quo of library and information science research in Taiwan: A meta-analysis of journal articles and dissertations/theses. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 43(4), 389-411. (in Chinese).
19. Raptis, P. (1992). Authorship characteristics in five international library science journals. Libri, 42(1), 35-52.
20. Sugimoto, C. R., Li, D., Russell, T. G., Finlay, S. C., & Ding, Y. (2011). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American library and information science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 185-204.
21. Sugimoto, C. R., Russell, T. G., & Grant, S. (2009). Library and information science doctoral education: The landscape from 1930-2007. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(3), 190-202.
22. Tsay, M. (2011). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals: JASIST, IPM, JOD, 1998-2008. Scientometrics, 89(2), 591-606.
23. Tsay, M., & Shu, Z. (2011). Journal bibliometric analysis: A case study on the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 67(5), 806-822.
24. Uzun, A. (2002). Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: A brief bibliometric perspective. The International Information & Library Review, 34(1), 21-33.