Supply chain risk management and its mitigation in a food industry

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 3039-3050

  Diabat, Ali ^a   Govindan, Kannan ^b   Panicker, Vinay V ^c  

^a KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CALICUT   (India)

Author keywords

food supply chain; interpretive structural modelling (ISM); risk mitigation; supply chain risk management (SCRM)

Indexed keywords

FOOD INDUSTRIES; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; RISK MITIGATION; STRUCTURAL MODELLING; SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT;

FOOD SUPPLY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84862661981     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.588619     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Blackhurst, J. 2005. An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (19): 4067-4081. (Pubitemid 41657423)
2. Bolaos, R, Fontela, RE, and, Pastor, P. 2005. Using interpretive structural modeling in strategic decision-making groups. Management Decision, 43 (5/6): 877-895. (Pubitemid 40906615)
3. Brand Jr, D.H., Irwin, D.M. and Kawamura, K., 1976. Implementation of interpretive structural modeling in a state-level planning context. 7th annual Pittsburgh conference on modeling and simulation, 26-27 April 1976, Pittsburgh, Instrument Society of America, 826-834
4. Canbolat, YB. 2008. Analysing risk in sourcing design and manufacture of components and sub-systems to emerging markets. International Journal of Production Research, 46 (18): 5145-5164.
5. Chidambaram, V., 2003. Supply chain risk management: A study on inbound supply risk analysis. Thesis (MS). Department of Industrial Engineering, Arizona State University
6. Chopra, S, and, Sodhi, M. 2004. Avoiding supply chain breakdown. Sloan Management Review, 46 (1): 53-62.
7. Christopher, M. 1992. Logistics and supply chain management, London: Pitman.
8. Deloach, JW. 2000. Enterprise-wide risk management. Strategies for linking risk and opportunities, London: Financial Times/Prentice-Hall.
9. Harary, F, Norman, RZ, and, Cartwright, D. 1965. Structural models: An introduction to the theory of directed graphs, New York: Wiley.
10. Faisal, MN, Banwet, DK, and, Shankar, R. 2006. Supply chain risk mitigation: modelling the enablers. Business Process Management Journal, 12 (4): 535-552. (Pubitemid 44086467)
11. Harland, C, Brenchley, R, and, Walker, H. 2003. Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 9 (2): 51-62. (Pubitemid 38613755)
12. Hart, W.L. and Malone, D.W., 1974. Goal setting for a state environmental agency. IEEE conference on decision and control, 20-22 November, Phoenix, AZ, IEEE
13. Hawthorne, RW, and, Sage, AP. 1975. On applications of interpretive structural modelling to Higher education program planning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 9 (1): 31-43.
14. Huang, H-Y, Chou, Y-C, and, Chang, S. 2009. A dynamic system model for proactive control of dynamic events in full-load states of manufacturing chains. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (9): 2485-2506.
15. Jedlicka, A, and, Mayer, R. 1980. Interpretive structural modelling cross-cultural uses. Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 10 (1): 49-51. (Pubitemid 10457121)
16. Jharkharia, S, and, Shankar, R. 2004. IT enablement of supply chains: modeling the enablers. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53 (8): 700-712.
17. Jharkharia, S, and, Shankar, R. 2005. IT enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18 (1/2): 11-27. (Pubitemid 40688970)
18. Johnson, ME. 2001. Learning from toys: lessons in managing supply chain risk from the toy industry. California Management Review, 43 (3): 106-124.
19. Jttner, U., Peck, H. and Christopher, M., 2002. Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. In: J. Griffiths, F. Hewitt and P. Ireland, eds. Proceedings of the Logistics Research Network 7th annual conference, 4-6 September 2002, Birmingham. London: Institute of Logistics and Transport, 443-450
20. Kannan, G, and, Haq, NA. 2007. Analysis of interactions of criteria and sub-criteria for the selection of supplier in the built-in-order supply chain environment. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (17): 3831-3852. (Pubitemid 47171499)
21. Kanungo, S, Duda, S, and, Srinivas, YA. 1999. A structured model for evaluating information systems effectiveness. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16 (6): 495-518.
22. Kawamura, K. and Christakis, A.N., 1976. The role of structural modeling in technology assessment. 2nd international congress on technology assessment, October 1976, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
23. Knight, FH. 1921. Risk, uncertainty, and profit, Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner & Marx; Houghton Mifflin Company.
24. Kumar, SK, Tiwari, MK, and, Babiceanu, RF. 2010. Minimisation of supply chain cost with embedded risk using computational intelligence approaches. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (13): 3717-3739.
25. Lockamy, A. III, and, McCormack, K. 2010. Analysing risks in supply networks to facilitate outsourcing decisions. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (2): 593-611.
26. Mandal, A, and, Deshmukh, SG. 1993. Vendor selection using interpretative structural modeling. International Journal of Operations & Productions Management, 14 (6): 52-59.
27. Norrman, A, and, Jansson, U. 2004. Ericsson's proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34 (5): 434-456.
28. Norrman, A. and Lindroth, R., 2002. Supply chain risk management: purchasers vs planners views on sharing capacity investment risks in the telecom industry. Proceedings of the 11th international annual IPSERA conference, 25-27 March, Twente University. Enschede NI: IPSERA, 577-595
29. Oke, A, and, Gopalakrishnan, M. 2009. Managing disruptions in supply chains: A case study of a retail supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 118 (1): 168-174.
30. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage, New York: The Free Press.
31. Ravi, V, and, Shankar, R. 2004. Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72 (8): 1011-1029.
32. Ravi, V, Shankar, R, and, Tiwari, MK. 2005. Productivity improvement of a computer hardware supply chain. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54 (4): 239-255. (Pubitemid 40689118)
33. Ritchie, RL, and, Brindley, CS. 2001. The information-risk conundrum. Journal of Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 19 (1): 29-37.
34. Sage, AP. 1977. Interpretive structural modeling: Methodology for large-scale systems, 91-164. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35. Saxena, JP, Sushil, J, and, Vrat, P. 1992. Hierarchy and classication of program plan elements using interpretive structural modeling: a case study of energy conservation in the Indian cement industry. Systems Practice, 5 (6): 651-670.
36. Sushil, J. 2005. Interpretive matrix: a tool to aid interpretation of management and social research. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 6 (2): 27-30.
37. Svensson, G. 2000. A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30 (9): 731-750.
38. Tang, CS. 2006. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103 (2): 451-488. (Pubitemid 44038496)
39. Thakkar, J. 2006. Development of a balanced scorecard: an integrated approach of interpretive structural modelling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56 (1): 25-69.
40. Wall Street Journal, 2001. Trial by fire-a blaze in Albuquerque sets off major crisis for cell-phone giants, 29 January
41. Warfield, J.N., 1973. An assault on complexity. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio. Battelle Monograph
42. Warfield, JW. 1974. Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 4 (1): 51-81.
43. Wu, T, Blackhurst, J, and, Chidambaram, V. 2006. A model for inbound supply risk analysis. Computers in Industry, 57 (4): 350-365.
44. Wu, DD, and, Olson, D. 2010. Enterprise risk management: a DEA VaR approach in vendor selection. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (16): 4919-4932.
45. Yang, B, and, Yang, Y. 2010. Postponement in supply chain risk management: a complexity perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (7): 1901-1912.
46. Yin, RK. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. You, N, Kato, Y, and, Kitaoka, M. 1994. Numerous data in hierarchy for knowledge concentrated in decision tree. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 27 (1): 535-539.
48. Zsidisin, G, Panelli, A, and, Upton, R. 2000. Purchasing organisation involvement in risk assessment, contingency plans, and risk management: an exploratory study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5 (4): 187-197. (Pubitemid 39034410)