VizDeck: Self-organizing dashboards for visual analytics

Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 681-684

  Key, Alicia ^a   Howe, Bill ^a   Perry, Daniel ^a   Aragon, Cecilia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

visualization

Indexed keywords

CARD GAMES; COMPLEX PATTERN; DATA SETS; DATA SOURCE; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; RELATIONAL DATA; SELF ORGANIZING; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON; VISUAL ANALYTICS; WEB-BASED TOOLS;

DATABASE SYSTEMS; FLOW VISUALIZATION;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84862659866     PISSN: 07308078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2213836.2213931     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. S. Abiteboul, O. Greenshpan, T. Milo, and N. Polyzotis. Matchup: Autocompletion for mashups. In ICDE, pages 1479-1482, 2009.
2. S. Baker, J. Berger, P. Brady, K. Borne, S. Glotzer, R. H. D. Johnson, A. Karr, D. Keyes, B. Pate, and H. Prosper. Data-enabled science in the mathematical and physical sciences. Technical report, National Science Foundation, March 2010.
3. M. Dörk, S. Carpendale, C. Collins, and C. Williamson. Visgets: Coordinated visualizations for web-based information exploration and discovery. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14:1205-1212, November 2008.
4. H. Elmeleegy, A. Ivan, R. Akkiraju, and R. Goodwin. Mashup advisor: A recommendation tool for mashup development. In ICWS '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pages 337-344, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society.
5. R. J. Ennals and M. N. Garofalakis. Mashmaker: mashups for the masses. In SIGMOD '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 1116-1118, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
6. B. Gegosian. Ocean observing initiative, 2005. http://www. oceanleadership.org/ocean\-observing.
7. D. Gotz and Z. Wen. Behavior-driven visualization recommendation. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, IUI '09, pages 315-324, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
8. T. Hey, S. Tansley, and K. Tolle, editors. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research, 2009.
9. B. Howe. Sqlshare: Database-as-a-service for long tail science. http://escience.washington.edu/sqlshare.
10. B. Howe and G. Cole. SQL Is Dead; Long Live SQL: Lightweight Query Services for Ad Hoc Research Data. In 4th Microsoft eScience Workshop, 2010.
11. The integrated ocean observing system. http://ioos.gov/.
12. C. Johnson. Top scientific visualization research problems. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 24(4):13-17, 2004.
13. J. Mackinlay. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5:110-141, 1986.
14. J. Mackinlay. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. In Readings in information visualization: using vision to think, pages 66-82. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999.
15. Many eyes. http://services.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/home.
16. D. A. Norman. Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Addison Wesley, 1994.
17. D. Perry, A. Key, B. Howe, and C. Aragon. Sparking visual discovery: Evaluating vizdeck as an interactive visualization system. In CHI 2012 (Works in Progress), 2012.
18. S. F. Roth and J. Mattis. Data characterization for intelligent graphics presentation. In CHI '90: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 193-200, New York, NY, USA, 1990. ACM Press.
19. Sloan Digital Sky Survey. http://cas.sdss.org.
20. C. Stolte and P. Hanrahan. Polaris: A system for query, analysis and visualization of multi-dimensional relational databases. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8:52-65, 2002.
21. A. Szalay and J. Gray. 2020 computing: Science in an exponential world. Nature, 440(7083):413, 2006.
22. Tableau. http://www.tableausoftware.com/.