Lowering barriers to college access: Opportunities for more effective coordination of state and federal student aid policies

Expanding Opportunity in Higher Education: Leveraging Promise

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 53-73

  Fitzgerald, Brian K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862645118     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. William D. Ford Direct Loan Program, the Work-study Program, 70 Brian K. Fitzgerald
2. TRIO, Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP), High School Equivalency Programs, and College Assistance Migrant Programs.
3. For reviews of literature and analyses of the effects of net price and student aid on college enrollment see, for example, Fitzgerald and Delaney (2002), Ellwood and Kane (2000), and McPherson and Schapiro (1999).
4. Lee (1999) and McPherson and Schapiro (1999).
5. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2001). Access denied: Restoring the nation's commitment to equal educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Author
6. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2002). Empty promises: The myth of college access in America. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2003). Efforts to Improve College Access. Washington, DC: Author.
8. California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC). (2002). The California Postsecondary Education Commission's Public Agenda: Priorities for Action. Commission Report 02-5. Sacramento, CA: Author.
9. California Student Aid Commission (CSAC). ( 2003). Facts at Your Fingertips: Grant & Loan Programs 2000-2001. Sacramento, CA: Author.
10. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2001). Access denied: Restoring the nation's commitment to equal educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Author.
11. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2002). Empty promises: The myth of college access in America. Washington, DC: Author
12. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. (2003). Efforts to Improve College Access. Washington, DC: Author.
13. California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC). (2002). The California Postsecondary Education Commission's Public Agenda: Priorities for Action. Commission Report 02-5. Sacramento, CA: Author.
14. California Student Aid Commission (CSAC). ( 2003). Facts at Your Fingertips: Grant & Loan Programs 2000-2001. Sacramento, CA: Author. Lowering Barriers to College Access 71
15. Carnevale, A. P., & Fry, R. A. (2000). Crossing the great divide: Can we achieve equity when Generation Y goes to college? ETS Leadership 2000 Series. Princeton, NJ:
16. Educational Testing Service. College Board. (2002a). Trends in student aid, 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
17. College Board. (2002b). Trends in college pricing, 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Ellwood, D. T., & Kane, T. J. (2000). Who is getting a college education? Family background and the growing gaps in enrollment. In S. Danziger & J. Waldfogel (Eds.), Securing the Future: Investing in Children from Birth to College. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19. Fitzgerald, B. K. (1990). Equity and efficiency: An analysis of simplifying the Pell Grant eligibility formula. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard University.
20. Fitzgerald, B. K. (1991). Simplification of need analysis and delivery: Imperatives and opportunities. In J. Merisotis (Ed.), The Changing Dimensions of Student Aid. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Fitzgerald, B. K., & Delaney, J. A. (2002). Educational opportunity in America. In D. Heller (Ed.), Condition of Access. Higher Education for Lower Income Students. Westport, CT: Praeger.
22. Hebel, S. (2002, November 8). Colorado eyes voucher system to ease financial strain. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(11).
23. Hebel, S. (2003, October 10). California budget woes lead colleges to limit access. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(7).
24. Heller, D. E. (2001). The effects of tuition prices and financial aid on enrollment in higher education: California and the nation. Cordova, CA: EdFund.
25. H.R. 4911, the "Higher Education Extension Act of 2006," which extends programs authorize Higher Education Act of 1965 through June 30, 2006.
26. Kane, T. J. (2001). Assessing the American financial aid system: What we know, what we need to know. In M. Devlin (Ed.), Forum Futures 2001: Exploring the Future of Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: Forum for the Future of Higher Education.
27. Kane, T. J. (2003). A Quasi-experimental estimate of the impact of financial aid on college-going. Working Paper No. 9703. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
28. King, J. E. (2003). 2003 Status Report on the Pell Grant Program. Washington, DC: The American Council on Education.
29. Lee, J. B. (1999). How do students and families pay for college? In J. E. King (Ed.), Financing a College Education: How It Works, How It's Changing. Phoenix, AZ: The American Council on Education and The Oryx Press.
30. Legislative Analyst Office. (2003). California spending plan 2003-04. Sacramento, CA: Author.
31. McPherson, M. S., & Schapiro, M. O. (1999, May). Reinforcing stratification in American higher education: Some disturbing trends. St. Paul, MN: Macalester Forum on Higher Education Conference, Diversity and Stratification in American Higher Education.
32. Morgan, R. (2002, August 16). Pell grant program may still face 1 billion shortfall. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(49).
33. National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs (NASSGAP). (2003). 33rd Annual NASSGAP Survey. Springfield, IL: Author.
34. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates. Washington, DC: Author.
35. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2002). Digest of educational statistics. Washington, DC: Author
36. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2002). Losing ground: A national status report on the affordability of American higher education. San Jose, CA: Author.
37. Palmer, J. C. (2002). Grapevine: A national database of tax support for higher education. Normal, IL: Illinois State University Press.
38. Russakoff, D., & Argetsinger, A. (2003, July 22). States plan big tuition increases. The Washington Post.
39. St. John, E. P., Musoba, D. G, Simmons, A. B., & Chung, C. G. (2002). Meeting the access challenge: Indiana's twenty-first century scholars program. Bloomington, IA: Indiana Education Policy Center.
40. Swail, W. S., Gladieux, L. E., & Lee, J. B. (2001). The California dream and its future: indicators of educational and economic opportunity in the golden state. Cordova, CA: EdFund.
41. Swail,W. S. (July 2002). Higher education and the new demographics: Questions for Policy. Change Magazine. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
42. US PIRG. (2002). The burden of borrowing. A report on the rising rates of student loan debt. Washington, DC: Author.
43. Wellman, J. (2002). Accounting for student aid: How state policy and student aid connect. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy
44. Wolanin, T. R. (2003). Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act: Issues and options. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.