Evaluating virtual router performance for a pluralist Future Internet

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Mattos, Diogo M F ^a   Ferraz, Lyno Henrique G ^a   Costa, Luís Henrique M K ^a   Duarte, Otto Carlos M B ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

evaluation; hypervisor; OpenVZ; virtual router; VMware; Xen

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; HYPERVISOR; OPENVZ; VMWARE; XEN;

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS; PROFITABILITY; ROUTERS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 84862639336     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2222444.2222448     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. BGP Reports. http://bgp.potaroo.net/ipv4-stats/prefixes adv pool.txt, Jan. 2012.
2. M. Casado, T. Koponen, R. Ramanathan, and S. Shenker. Virtualizing the network forwarding plane. PRESTO '10, pages 8:1-8:6, 2010.
3. S. Chen, M. Zhu, and L. Xiao. Implementation of virtual time system for the distributed virtual machine monitor. IEEE/ISECS International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management, August 2009.
4. R. S. Couto, M. E. M. Campista, and L. H. M. K. Costa. XTC: a throughput control mechanism for Xen-based virtualized software routers. In IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM'2011), Houston, Texas, USA, Dec. 2011.
5. N. Egi, A. Greenhalgh, M. Handley, M. Hoerdt, L. Mathy, and T. Schooley. Evaluating xen for router virtualization. In International Workshop on Performance Modeling and Evaluation (PMECT), August 2007.
6. N. Feamster, L. Gao, and J. Rexford. How to Lease the Internet in your Spare Time. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 37:61-64, Jan. 2007.
7. N. Fernandes, M. Moreira, I. Moraes, L. Ferraz, R. Couto, H. Carvalho, M. Campista, L. Costa, and O. Duarte. Virtual networks: isolation, performance, and trends. Annals of Telecommunications, 66:339-355, 2011.
8. D. Gupta, R. Gardner, and L. Cherkasova. Xenmon: Qos monitoring and performance profiling tool. HP Labs, Tech. Rep., 2005.
9. K. Ibrahim, S. Hofmeyr, and C. Iancu. Characterizing the performance of parallel applications on multi-socket virtual machines. In Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid), 2011 11th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on, pages 1-12. IEEE, 2011.
10. V. Makhija, B. Herndon, P. Smith, L. Roderick, E. Zamost, and J. Anderson. Vmmark: A scalable benchmark for virtualized systems. VMware Inc, CA, Tech. Rep. VMware-TR-2006-002, September, 2006.
11. N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S., and J. Turner. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2):69-74, Apr. 2008.
12. A. Menon, A. L. Cox, and W. Zwaenepoel. Optimizing network virtualization in Xen. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pages 15-28, May 2006.
13. G. Schaffrath, C. Werle, P. Papadimitriou, A. Feldmann, R. Bless, A. Greenhalgh, A. Wundsam, M. Kind, O. Maennel, and L. Mathy. Network Virtualization Architecture: Proposal and Initial Prototype. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Virtualized infrastructure systems and architectures, VISA '09, pages 63-72, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
14. SWsoft Inc. OpenVZ User's Guide, 2005.
15. VMWare Inc. VMware ESX Server 2 Architecture and Performance Implications, 2005.
16. VMWare Inc. A Performance Comparison of Hypervisors, 2007.
17. XenSource, Inc. A Performance Comparison of Commercial Hypervisors, 2007.