Macular hole surgery prognostic success rates based on macular hole size

Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 184-189

  Salter, Amanda B ^a   Folgar, Francisco A ^a,b   Weissbrot, Joseph ^b   Wald, Kenneth J ^a,c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b EAR AND THROAT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RETINA MACULA HOLE; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

ENDOTAMPONADE; FEMALE; FLUOROCARBONS; HUMANS; MALE; PROGNOSIS; PRONE POSITION; PSEUDOPHAKIA; RETINAL PERFORATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 84862609197     PISSN: 15428877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20120102-05     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes: results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:654-659.
2. Judson PH, Yannuzzi LA. Macular hole. In: Ryan SJ, ed. Retina, vol. 2. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994:1169-1185.
3. Gass JDM. Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment, vol. 2, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1997.
4. Ip MS, Baker BJ, Duker JS, et al. Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:29-35. (Pubitemid 34721358)
5. Freeman WR, Azen SP, Kim JW, El-Haig W, Mishell DR III, Bailey I. Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes: results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:11-21.
6. Altaweel M, Ip M. Macular hole: improved understanding of pathogenesis, staging, and management based on optical coherence tomography. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003;18:58-66. (Pubitemid 37108394)
7. Ulrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:390-393. (Pubitemid 34293285)
8. Ruiz-Moreno JM, Staicu C, Piñero DP, Montero J, Lugo F, Amat P. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:640-644. (Pubitemid 351684173)
9. Ryan EH Jr, Gilbert HD. Results of surgical treatment of recentonset full-thickness idiopathic macular holes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1545-1553. (Pubitemid 24373072)
10. Hoerauf H. Predictive values in macular hole repair: optical coherence tomography improves the management of persistent macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1415-1416.
11. Schumann RG, Rohleder M, Schaumberger MM, Haritoglou C, Kampik A, Gandorfer A. Idiopathic macular holes: ultrastructural aspects of surgical failure. Retina. 2008;28:340-349. (Pubitemid 351643167)
12. Tadayoni R, Gaudric A, Haouchine B, Massin P. Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1239-1241. (Pubitemid 44621482)
13. Desai VN, Hee MR, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography of macular holes. In: Madreperla SA, McCuen BW, eds. Macular Hole: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999:37-47.