Graphical representation of key iterations during the design process

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 42, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Daniel, Jonathan ^a   Medland, Tony ^a   Newnes, Linda ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design process; Iteration; Methodology

Indexed keywords

DESIGN ACTIVITY; DESIGN PROCESS; EVALUATION ACTIVITY; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATIONS; INFORMATION GATHERING; ITERATION; METHODOLOGY; NEW DESIGN;

ENGINEERING; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING;

DESIGN;

EID: 84862605175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cross, N. (1994). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product design. 2nd Ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2. French, M.J. (1971). Engineering Design: The conceptual stage. London: Heinemann Educational books.
3. Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering Design - A Systematic Approach. 2nd Ed. London: Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
4. Kruger, C. & Cross, N. (2006). Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Design Studies., 27(5), September 2006, pp528-548.
5. Smith, R.P. & Tjandra, P. (1998). Experimental observation of iteration in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design., Vol 10, pp107-117
6. Maffin, D. (1998). Engineering Design Models: Context, theory and practice. Journal of Engineering Design., 9(4), pp315-327
7. Frost, R.B. (1999). Why Does Industry Ignore Design Science? Journal of Engineering Design. 10(4). pp301-304
8. Hatcheul, A. & Weil, B. (2003). A new approach of innovative design: An introduction to C-K theory. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED '03., Stockholm, 2003.
9. Kroes, P. (2002). Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts. Design Studies., 23(3) May 2002, pp287-302
10. Eder, W.E. (1998). Design Modeling - A design science approach (and why does industry not use it?). Journal of Engineering Design., 9(4). pp355-371
11. Sondgrass, A. & Coyne, R. (1992). Models, Metaphors and the Hermeneutics of Designing. Design Issues. 9(1), pp56-74
12. Stone, R.B. & Wood, K.L. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design., Dec 2000, Vol 122, pp359-370
13. Murdock, J. & McDermid, J.A. (2000). Modelling engineering design processes with role activity diagrams. Transactions of the Society for Design and Process Science., 4(2). pp45-65.
14. Austin, S., Steel, J., Macmillan, S., Kirby, P. & Spence, R. (2001). Mapping the conceptual design activity of interdisciplinary teams. Design Studies. 22(3). Pp211-232.
15. Potts, C. & Bruns, G. (1988). Recording the reasons for design decisions. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Software Engineering, Singapore, 1988, pp418-427
16. Wynn, D.C., Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J. (2005). Modelling and Simulating Iterative Development Processes. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED '05., Melbourne, 2005
17. Smith, R.P., Eppinger, S.D., (1997). Identifying Controlling Features of Engineering Design Iteration. Management Science.,43(3), pp276-293
18. Smeds, R. (1994). Managing change towards lean enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(3), 1994, pp66-82