Optimization of the forging of aerofoil blade using the finite element method and fuzzy-Pareto based genetic algorithm

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1801-1810

  Alimirzaloo, V ^a   Sadeghi, M H ^b   Biglari, F R ^c  

^a URMIA UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Aerofoil blade; Finite element analysis; Forging; Genetic algorithm; Optimization; Response surface method

Indexed keywords

AEROFOIL BLADES; ANGULAR POSITIONS; COMPROMISE SOLUTIONS; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FINITE-ELEMENT APPROACH; FORGING PROCESS; GLOBAL OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; LATERAL FORCE; MEMBERSHIP VALUES; MULTI OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATIONS (MOO); MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; NON-ISOTHERMAL FORGING; NONUNIFORMITY; NUMERICAL RESULTS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; PARETO FRONT; PARTING LINE; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FORGING; FORGINGS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84862604057     PISSN: 1738494X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-012-0429-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. J. W. Rooks, T. A. Dean, Z. M. Hu and E. Wey, Threedimensional finite element modelling of a titanium aluminide aerofoil forging, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 80-81 (1998) 149-155.
2. Z. M. Hu and T. A. Dean, Aspects of forging of titanium alloys and the production of blade forms, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 111 (2001) 10-19.
3. M. Zhan, H. Yang and Y. Liu, Deformation characteristic of the precision forging of a blade with a damper platform using 3D FEM analysis, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 150 (2004) 290-299.
4. C. Lv. Zhang, L. Z. Mu, Q. Tai and Q. Zheng, 3D FEM simulation of the multi-stage forging process of a gas turbine compressor blade, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 198 (2008) 463-470.
5. B. S. Kang, N. Kim and S. Kobayashi, Computer-aided preform design in forging of an airfoil section blade, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., 30(1) (1990) 43-52.
6. H. Ou and R. Balendra, Preform design for forging of aerofoil sections using FE simulation, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 80-81 (1998) 144-148.
7. H. Ou and C. G. Armstrong, Die shape compensation in hot forging of titanium aerofoil sections, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 125-126 (2002) 347-352.
8. H. Ou, J. Lan, C. G. Armstrong and M. A. Price, An FE simulation and optimisation approach for the forging of aero engine components, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 151 (2004) 208-216.
9. H. Ou, C. G. Armstronga and M. A. Price, Die shape optimization in forging of aerofoil sections, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 132 (2003) 21-27.
10. B. Lu, H. Ou, C. G. Armstrong and A. Rennie, 3D die shape optimization for net-shape forging of aerofoil blades, Materials and Design, doi: 10. 1016/j. matdes. 2008. 10. 007.
11. H. Ou and R. Balendra, Preform design for forging of aero-foil sections using FE simulation, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 80-81 (1998) 144-148.
12. V. Pareto, Cours d'economic politique, Rouge, Lausanne, Switzerland (1896).
13. K. Atashkari, N. Nariman-Zadeh, A. Pilechi, A. Jamali and X. Yao, Thermodynamic Pareto optimization of turbojet engines using multi-objective genetic algorithms, Int. J. Ther. Sci., 44 (2005) 1061-1071.
14. D. Sarkar and J. M. Modak, Pareto-optimal solutions for multi-objective optimization of fed-batch bioreactors using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60 (2005) 481-492.
15. K. Deb, Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, Chichester, UK (2001).
16. R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, Response surface methodology, J. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA (2002).
17. J. F. Lin and C. C. Chou, The response surface method and the analysis of mild oxidational wear, Tribology International, 35 (2002) 771-785.
18. H. Ou and R. Balendra, Preform design for forging of aerofoil sections using FE simulation, J. Mat. Proc. Tech., 80-81 (1998) 144-148.
19. Y. V. R. K. Prasad and S. Sasidhara, Hot working guide, ASM International (1997).