Stochastic traffic equilibrium based on travel time robust reliability

Jiaotong Yunshu Xitong Gongcheng Yu Xinxi/Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Sun, Hua ^a   Gao, Zi You ^a  

^a BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Robust mean excess travel time; Robust percentile travel time; Stochastic traffic equilibrium problem; System engineering; Variational inequalities; Worst case conditional value at risk; Worst case value at risk

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK; HEURISTIC SOLUTIONS; LINK CAPACITIES; LINK-COST FUNCTION; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; ORIGIN DESTINATION; POSITIVE INTEGERS; RISK MEASURES; ROBUST RELIABILITY; SOLUTION ALGORITHMS; STOCHASTIC TRAFFIC; STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM; TRAFFIC EQUILIBRIUM; TRAVEL DEMAND; VALUE AT RISK; VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES;

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; VALUE ENGINEERING; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 84862603314     PISSN: 10096744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fosgerau M, Engelson L. The value of travel time variance [J]. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45 (1): 1-8.
2. Jorion P. Value-at-Risk: the new benchmark for controlling market risk [M]. Irwin Professional Publishing, Chicago, 1996.
3. Rockafellar R T, Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk [J]. Journal of Risk, 2000, 2(3): 21-41.
4. Nie Y. Multi-class percentile user equilibrium with flow-dependent stochastic [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2011, 45(10): 1641-1659.
5. Hall P R. Travel outcome and performance: the effect of uncertainty on accessibility [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1983, 17 (4): 275-290.
6. Wu X, Nie Y. Modeling heterogeneous risk-taking behavior in route choice; a stochastic dominance approach [J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2011, 45(9): 896-915.
7. Lo H K, Luo X W, Siu B W Y. Degradable transportation network; travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2006, 40(9): 792-806.
8. Shao H, Lam W H K, Tam M L. Demand Driven traffic assignment problem based on travel time reliability [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2006, 1985: 220-230.
9. Shao H, Lam W H K, Tarn M L. A reliability-based stochastic traffic assignment model for network with multiple user classes under uncertain in demand [J]. Network and Spatial Economics, 2006, 6(3/4): 313-332.
10. Siu B W Y, Lo H K. Doubly uncertain transport network; Degradable capacity and stochastic demand [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 191(1): 166-181.
11. Lam W H K, Shao H, Sumalee A. Modeling impacts of adverse weather conditions on a road network with uncertainties in demand and supply [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2008, 42 (10): 890-910.
12. Chen A, Zhou Z. Modeling stochastic perception error in the mean-excess traffic equilibrium model [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2011, 45 (10): 1619-1640.
13. Waiting D. User equilibrium traffic network assignment with stochastic travel times and late arrival penalty [J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2005, 175(3): 1539-1556.
14. Chen A, Zhou Z. The alpha-reliable mean-excess traffic equilibrium model with stochastic travel times [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2010, 44 (4): 493-513.
15. Zhou Z, Chen A. Comparative analysis of three user equilibrium models under stochastic demand [J] . Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2008, 42 (3): 239-263.
16. Cerbáková J. Worst-case VaR and CVaR [C]. Operation Research Proceedings, 2006, 2005 (22): 817-822.
17. Popescu I. A semidefinite programming approach to optimal-moment bounds for convex classes of distributions [J]. Mathematics of Operation Research, 2005, 30(3): 632-657.
18. Faechinei F, Pang J S. Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problem [M]. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.
19. Sumalee A, Connors R D, Luthep P. Network equilibrium under cumulative prospect theory and endogenous stochastic demand and supply [C]. In; Lam WHK, Wong SC, Lo HK (Eds.). Proceedings of 18th International Symposium of Transportation and Traffic Theory, 2009, 2: 19-38.
20. Nguyen S, Dupuis C. An efficient of method for computing traffic equilibria in network with asymmetric transportation costs [J]. Transportation Science, 1984, 18(2): 185-202.
21. Yin Y, Madanat S M, Lu X. Robust improvement schemes for road networks under demand uncertainty [J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2009, 198(2): 470-479.