A hierarchical requirements modeling scheme to support engineering innovation

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 42, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Maier, Jonathan R A ^a   Ezhilan, Thulasiram ^a   Fadel, Georges M ^a   Summers, Joshua D ^a   Mocko, Gregory ^a  

^a AMRL   (United States)

Author keywords

Matrix model; Requirements modeling

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING DESIGN PROBLEMS; ENGINEERING INNOVATIONS; ENGINEERING PROBLEMS; MATERIAL SELECTION; MATRIX MODEL; REQUIREMENTS CAPTURE; REQUIREMENTS MODELING; SAFETY TESTS; SOFTWARE DESIGNERS; SUB-SYSTEMS; WORKING PRINCIPLES;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INNOVATION; SAFETY TESTING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

DESIGN;

EID: 84862602959     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Pahl G. and Beitz W. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach 2nd ed, 1996 (Springer, New York).
2. Hauser J.R. and Clausing D. The House of Quality. Harvard Business Rev iew, 1988, 3, pp. 63-73.
3. Mocko M., Summers J.D., Fadel G.M., Teegavarpu S., Maier J.R.A. and Ezhilan T. A modeling scheme for capturing and analzyzing multi-domain design information: a hair dryer example, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED '07, Paper no. 897. Paris, France, 2007 (The Design Society).
4. Pugh S. Total Design, Integrated methods for successful product engineering, 1991 (Addison Wesley)
5. Lubars M., Potts C. and Richter C. A review of the state of the practice in requirements modeling, in Proceedings of the International Requirements Engineering Symposium. Los Alamitos, C A, 1992: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 2-14.
6. Eas terbrook S., Lutz R., Covington R., Kelly J., Ampo Y. and Hamilton D. Experiences using lightweight formal methods for requirements modeling, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1998, 24(1):4-14.
7. Lee J. and Kuo J.Y. New Approach to Requirements Trade-Off Analysis for Complex Systems, IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., 10(4).
8. Gershenson J.K. and Stauffer L.A. A Taxonomy for Design Requirements from Corporate Customers. Journal of Research in Engineering Design, 1999 11(2): 103-115.
9. Rolland C. and Prakash N. From conceptual modelling to requirements engineering. Annals of Software Engineering, 2000 10: 151-176.
10. Ramesh B. and Jarke M. Toward Reference Models for Requirements Traceability. IEEE transactions on Software Engineering, 2001 27(1).
11. Laguna M. et al. Open Issues in Requirements Modeling for Reuse, in Applying Requirements Engineering, Durán, A, and M. Toro, eds., Salamanca, Spain, 2002 (Catedral Publ), pp. 73-88.
12. Delugach H. S. A Multiple Viewed Approach to Software Requirements, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Virginia, 1991.
13. Fu M.W. and Lu W.F. Modeling and Managem ent of Design Requirements in the Product Development Life Cycle", ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computer and Information Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2-6 September, 2003 (ASME).
14. Clarkson P.J., Simons C., Eckert C.M. Predicting change propagation in complex design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 2004, 126: 765-797.
15. Somé S. Supporting use case based requirements engineering, Information and Software Technology, 2005.
16. Hull E., Jackson K. and Dick J. Requirements Engineering, 2004 (Springer, New York).
17. UGS Teamcenter software. http://www.ugs.com/products/teamcenter/accessed 7 February 2007.
18. Dick J. (2004) "What is Requirements Management?" White paper, Version 1, 05 November 2004 (Telelogic). http://download.telelogic.com/download/ paper/WPWhatIsRMNov04.pdf
19. Telelogic DOORS software. http://www.telelogic.com/products/doors/doors/ index.cfm accessed 7 February 2007.
20. Conrad B., SysML and UML 2 Support for Activity Modeling. (Wiley InterScience) DOI 10.1002/sys.20046.
21. Sparx Systems. Requirements Management with Enterprise Architect. http://www.sparxsystems.com/downloads/whitepapers/Requirements-Management-in- Enterprise-Architect.pdf accesssed 7 February 2007.
22. Eurostep Group AB. A beginner's guide to AP233. http://ap233.eurostep. com/Beginners/Beginners%20Guide%20to%20AP233-files/frame.htm accessed 7 February 2007.
23. Browning T.R. Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions, IEEE transactions on Engineering Management, Vol 48, No.3, August 2001
24. Otto K. and Wood K. Product Design, 2001 (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
25. Galvao, A. B. and Sato K. Affordances in Product Architecture: Linking Technical Functions and User Requirements, Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Long Beach, CA, 2005. Paper no. DETC2005-84525.
26. Keller R, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ, Matrices or node-link diagrams: which visual representation is better for visualising connectivity models? Information Visualization (2006) 5, 62-76. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500116
27. th ASME Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle (DFMLC) Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA, 2006, Paper No. DETC2006-99252.
28. th ASME Computers and Information in Engineering (CIE) Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA, September 2006, Paper No. DETC2006-99481.
29. Olewnick, A. and K. Lewis. Can a House Without a Foundation Support Design? Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Long Beach, CA, 2005. Paper No. DETC2005-84765.