A behavioural model for representing biological and artificial systems for inspiring novel designs

Proceedings ICED 05, the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 35, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Chakrabarti, Amaresh ^a   Sarkar, Prabir ^a   Leelavathamma, B ^a   Nataraju, B S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Behavioural language; Bio mimicry; Design by analogy; Design problem solving; Idea generation; Inspiration

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOURAL LANGUAGE; BIO-MIMICRY; DESIGN PROBLEMS; IDEA GENERATION; INSPIRATION;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84862599955     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Larry W., Zimmerman.P.E and Glen D Hart, 1988, Value Engineering -a practical approach for owners, designers and contractors, CBS Publishers and Distributors.
2. Murakami Tamotsu, & Nakajima Naomasa, (1997). Mechanism Concept retrieval Using Configuration Space. Research in Engineering Design, 9: 9-11.
3. Kletke Marilyn, G. Mackay Jane, M. Barr Steve, H. & Jones Beata. (2001). Creativity in the organization: the role of individual creative problem solving and computer support. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 55, pp. 217-237.
4. MacCrimmon, K.R. & Wagner, C. (1994). Stimulating ideas through creative software. Management Science, 40, pp.1514-1532.
5. Watson, D. L.(1989). Enhancing creative productivity with the Fisher associated lists, the Journal of Creative Behavior, 23,pp. 51-58.
6. Vogel, S. (1998). Cat's Paws and Catapults: Mechanical Worlds of Nature and People. WW Norton, NY.
7. French, M.J. (1998). Invention and Evolution: Design in Nature and Engineering, CUP, Cambridge.
8. Bhatta, S. Goel, A. & Prabhakar, S. (1994). Innovation in Analogical Design: A Model- Based Approach. Proc. AI in Design, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 57-74.
9. Gordon, W.J.J. (1961). Synthesis: The Development of Creative Capacity, HAPPER & ROW, NY.
10. Chandrasekaran, B. (1994). Functional representation and causal processes, in Advances in Computers, M.C.Yovits, Editor., Academic Press. p. 73-143.
11. Qian, L. and Gero, J.S. (1996). Function-Behavior- Structure Paths and Their Role in Analogy- Based Design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 10, No. 4, Sept., pp. 289-312.
12. Umeda et al., Y., (1996). Supporting Conceptual Design Based on the Function- Behavior-State Modeler, AIEDAM, Vol. 10, No. 4, Sept. pp. 275-288.
13. Goel, A. K. (1997). Design, Analogy and Creativity. AI in Design.
14. Deng, Y.M. (2002) Function and Behavior Representation in Conceptual Mechanical Design, AI EDAM, 16, 343-262.
15. Chakrabarti, A. (2001). Towards hybrid methods for synthesis. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01 GLASGOW, pp. 379-386.
16. Chakrabarti, A. and Blessing, L. (1996). Special Issue: Representing functionality in design. Artificial Intelligence for Eng. Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 10, 251-253.
17. Chakrabarti, A and Bligh, T.P. (1993). Towards a Theory for Functional Reasoning. Proc. of the International Conference in Engineering Design (ICED93), The Hague, 1, 1-8.
18. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1988). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer.
19. Chakrabarti, A. Johnson, A.L. & Kiriyama, T. (1997). An Approach to Automated Synthesis of Solution Principles for Micro-Sensor Designs. Proc. Intl. Conference in Engineering Design, Vol. 2, Tampere, pp-125-128.
20. Hubka, V., (1976) Theorie der Konstruktionsprozesse, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
21. Andreasen, M. M. (1980), "Syntesemetoder pa Systemgrundlag", Ph.D, Thesis, Lund Technical university, Lund, Sweden.
22. Chakrabarti, A. & Bligh Thomas, P. (2001). A Scheme for Functional reasoning in Conceptual Design. Design Studies, Vol 22, No.6, pp. 493-517.
23. Yoshioka, M., & Tomiyama, T. (1997). Pluggable Metamodel Mechanism: A Framework of an Integrated Design Object Modelling Environment, in A. Bradshaw and J. Counsell (eds.): Computer Aided Conceptual Design '97, Proceedings of the 1997 Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design CACD '97, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, pp. 57-70
24. Chakrabarti, A. & Regno, R. (2001). A New Approach to Structure sharing. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01 GLASGOW, pp. 155-162.
25. IDEA-INSPIRE (2004) Idea-Inspire User's Manual, Centre for product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.