Utilization of cone-beam CT for offline evaluation of target volume coverage during prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on bony anatomy alignment

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 134-140

  Paluska, Petr ^a,b   Hanus, Josef ^a   Sefrova, Jana ^b   Rouskova, Lucie ^b   Grepl, Jakub ^b   Jansa, Jan ^b   Kasaova, Linda ^b   Hodek, Miroslav ^b   Zouhar, Milan ^b   Vosmik, Milan ^b   Petera, Jiri ^b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HRADEC KRALOVE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Dose reconstruction; Dose volume histogram; Image guided radiotherapy; Prostate

Indexed keywords

GLYCEROL;

ARTICLE; BLADDER; BLADDER CAPACITY; BONE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTATE; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTION; RADIATION DOSE FRACTIONATION; RECTUM; RISK REDUCTION; SEMINAL VESICLE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862595734     PISSN: 15071367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bindhu J., Supe S.S., Ramachandra A. Cyberknife: a double edged sword?. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010, 15(4):93-97.
2. van Herk M. Different styles of image-guided radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2007, 17:258-267.
3. Ceylan C., Kucuk N., Bas Ayata H., Guden M., Engin K. Dosimetric and physical comparison of IMRT and CyberKnife plans in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010, 15(6):181-189.
4. Kupelian P.A., Langen K.M., Willoughby T., et al. Image-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treating a moving target. Semin Radiat Oncol 2008, 18:58-66.
5. Balter J.M., Sandler H.M., Lam K., et al. Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995, 31:113-118.
6. Schallenkamp J.M., Herman M.G., Kruse J.J., et al. Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 63:800-811.
7. Bajon T., Piotrowski T., Antczak A., Bak B., Błasiak B., Kaźmierska J. Comparison of dose volume histograms for supine and prone position in patients irradiated for prostate cancer-a preliminary study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2011, 16(2):65-70.
8. Ghilezan J.M., Jaffray D.A., Siewerdsen J.H., et al. Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 62:406-417.
9. Sripadam R., Stratford J., Henry A.M., et al. Rectal motion can reduce CTV coverage and increase rectal dose during prostate radiotherapy: a daily cone-beam CT study. Radiother Oncol 2009, 90:312-317.
10. Yoo S., Yin F.F. Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 66:1553-1561.
11. Yang Y., Schreibmann E., Li T., et al. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52:685-705.
12. van Zijtveld M., Dirkx M., Breuers M., et al. Evaluation of the 'dose of the day' for IMRT prostate cancer patients derived from portal dose measurements and cone-beam CT. Radiother Oncol 2010, 96:172-177.
13. Lee L., Le Q.T., Xing L. Retrospective IMRT dose reconstruction based on cone-beam CT and MLC log-file. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008, 70:634-644.
14. Wang W., Wu Q., Yan D. Quantitative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in target volume definition for offline image-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2010, 94:71-75.
15. Pawlowski J.M., Yang E.S., Malcolm A.W., et al. Reduction of dose delivered to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients via image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, 76:924-934.
16. Hatton J.A., Greer P.B., Tang C., et al. Does the planning dose-volume histogram represent treatment doses in image-guided prostate radiation therapy? Assessment with cone-beam computerised tomography scans. Radiother Oncol 2011, 98:162-168.
17. Kasaova L., Sirak I., Jansa J., et al. Daily prostate volume and position monitoring using implanted gold markers and on-board imaging during radiotherapy. Acta Med 2011, 54:149-152.