Analyzing the impact of private service on the cesarean section rate in public hospital Thailand

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 284, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1375-1379

  Phadungkiatwattana, Podjanee ^a   Tongsakul, Naiyana ^a  

^a RANGSIT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cesarean section rate; Operative delivery; Private delivery

Indexed keywords

AGE DETERMINATION; APGAR SCORE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALPRESENTATION; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERINATAL DEATH; PLACENTA PREVIA; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGICAL RISK; THAILAND; TREATMENT INDICATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROUP PRACTICE; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE; HOSPITALS, PUBLIC; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIVATE PRACTICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; THAILAND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862588811     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: 14320711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-1867-0     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. World Health Organization (1985) Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 2(8452):436-437
2. Usha Kiran TS, Jayawickrama NS (2002) Who is responsible for the rising caesarean section rate? J Obstet Gynaecol 22(4):363-365
3. Potter JE, Berquo E, Perpétuo IH, Leal OF, Hopkins K, Souza MR, Formiga MC (2001) Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. BMJ 323:1155-1158 (Pubitemid 33078162)
4. Murray SF (2000) Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. Br Med J 321(7275):1501-1505 (Pubitemid 32011369)
5. Lee SI, Khang YH, Lee MS (2004) Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea-a society with high cesarean section rates. Birth 31(2):108-116
6. Tampakoudis P, Assimakopoulos E, Grimbizis G, Zafrakas M, Tampakoudis G, Mantalenakis S, Bontis J (2004) Cesarean section rates and indications in Greece: data from a 24-year period in a teaching hospital. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 31(4):289-292 (Pubitemid 40138173)
7. Florica M, Stephansson O, Nordstrom L (2006) Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92(2):181-185 (Pubitemid 43098892)
8. Penn Z, Ghaem-Maghami S (2001) Indications for caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15(1):1-15 (Pubitemid 32229140)
9. Tangcharoensathien V (1997) Pattern of hospital delivery in Thailand during 1990-1996, health system research institute, Bangkok
10. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, Attygalle DE, Shrestha N, Mori R, Nguyen DH, Hoang TB, Rathavy T, Chuyun K, Cheang K, Festin M, Udomprasertgul V, Germar MJ, Yanqiu G, Roy M, Carroli G, Ba-Thike K, Filatova E, Villar J (2010) Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the who global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-2008. Lancet 375(9713):490-499. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736 (09) 61870-5
11. Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, Velazco A, Bataglia V, Langer A, Narvaez A, Valladares E, Shah A, Campodonico L, Romero M, Reynoso S, de Padua KS, Giordano D, Kublickas M, Acosta A (2007) Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ 335(7628):1025
12. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM (2004) Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 103(5 (Pt 1)):907-912. doi:10.1097/01. AOG.0000124568.71597.ce (Pubitemid 40458991)
13. ACOG (2007) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394, December. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 110(6):1501
14. Lagrew DC Jr, Adashek JA (1998) Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(6):1207-1214 (Pubitemid 28304622)
15. ACOG (2006) ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists number 76, October 2006: postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 108(4):1039-1047
16. ACOG (2002) ACOG Practice Bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 99(1):159-167
17. ACOG (2009) ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 114(1):192-202. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106
18. Almeida S, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA, Silva AA, Ribeiro VS (2008) Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in brazil. Cad Saude Publ 24(12):2909-2918
19. Angeja AC, Washington AE, Vargas JE, Gomez R, Rojas I, Caughey AB (2006) Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why? BJOG 113(11):1253-1258 (Pubitemid 44581514)
20. Braveman P, Marchi K, Egerter S, Kim S, Metzler M, Stancil T, Libet M (2010) Poverty, near-poverty, and hardship around the time of pregnancy. Matern Child Health J 14(1):20-35. doi:10.1007/s10995-008-0427-0
21. Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Fre M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, Grandjean H, Gratia P, Guaschino S, Heyl W, Taylor D, Cuttini M (2006) Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG 113(6):647-656 (Pubitemid 43781695)
22. Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, Spong CY, Portnoy B, DeVoto E, Schulkin J (2007) Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 109(1):57-66 (Pubitemid 46035510)
23. Lin HC, Xirasagar S (2004) Institutional factors in cesarean delivery rates: policy and research implications. Obstet Gynecol 103(1):128-136 (Pubitemid 39248477)
24. Paranjothy S, Frost C, Thomas J (2005) How much variation in cs rates can be explained by case mix differences? BJOG 112(5):658-666 (Pubitemid 40675805)
25. Poma PA (1999) Effects of obstetrician characteristics on cesarean delivery rates. A community hospital experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(6 (Pt 1)):1364-1372 (Pubitemid 29293254)
26. Mawson AR (2002) Reducing cesarean delivery rates in managed care organizations. Am J Manage Care 8(8):730-740 (Pubitemid 34993511)
27. Peipert JF, Hogan JW, Gifford D, Chase E, Randall R (1999) Strength of indication for cesarean delivery: comparison of private physician versus resident service labor management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(2):435-439 (Pubitemid 29409928)