Seven myths about literacy in the United States

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages

  McQuillan, Jeff ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862579620     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Binkley, M. & Williams, T. (1996). Reading literacy in the United States: Findings from the IEA reading literacy study. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
2. Bracey, G. (1997). Setting the record straight: Responses to misconceptions about public education in the United States. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Campbell, J.; Donahue, P. et al.(1996). NAEP 1994 reading report card for the nation and the states. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education.
4. Chelimsky, E. (1993). National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) Achievement Levels. Interim Letter Report. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED342821).
5. Coulson, A. (1996). Schooling and literacy over time: The rising cost of stagnation and decline. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 311-327.
6. Elley,W. (1994). Preface. In W. Elley (Ed.), The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems (pp. xxi-xxii). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
7. Glass, G. (1978). Standards and criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 237-261.
8. Kirsch, I., Jungblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Center of Educational Statistics.
9. Levine, A. (1996). America's reading crisis: Why the whole language approach to teaching reading has failed millions of children. Parents, 16, 63-65, 68.
10. McGuinness, D. (1997). Why our children can't read and what we can do about it: A scientific revolution in reading. New York: The Free Press.
11. Murray, C. & Herrnstein, R.(1992). What's really behind the SAT-score decline? The Public Interest, 106, 32-56.
12. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1994). Data compendium for the NAEP 1992 Reading Assessment of the nation and the states. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
13. Shaywitz, S.; Escobar, M.; Shaywitz, B.; Fletcher, J.; & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 326(3), 145-150.
14. Shaywitz, S.; Fletcher, J.; & Shaywitz, B. (1994). Issues in the definition of and classification of attention deficit disorder. Topics in Language Disorders, 14 (4), 1-25.
15. Shaywitz, B. et al. (1996). The Yale Center for the Study of Learning and Attention: Longitudinal and neurobiological studies. Dallas, TX: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of IDA.
16. Stewart, J. (1996). The blackboard bungle: California's failed reading experiment. LA Weekly, 18(14), 22-29.
17. Walberg,H. (1996). U.S. schools teach reading least productively.
18. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 328-343.