Dynamic relaxation of a liquid cavity under amorphous boundary conditions

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 136, Issue 20, 2012, Pages

  Cavagna, Andrea ^a,b   Grigera, Tomás S ^c,d   Verrocchio, Paolo ^e,f,g,h  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^c INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES FISICOQUÍMICAS TEÓRICAS Y APLICADAS INIFTA   (Argentina)

^d Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^f Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Computational Physics (LISC)   (Italy)

^g ISC CNR   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED PROCESS; BULK VALUE; CAVITY SIZE; CONFINED SYSTEMS; COOPERATIVELY REARRANGING REGIONS; CORRELATION FUNCTION; CORRELATION LENGTHS; DYNAMIC RELAXATION; EQUILIBRATION TIME; EXTERNAL CONFIGURATION; GLASS-FORMING LIQUID; LIQUID DROPLETS; LOW TEMPERATURES; MODE COUPLING THEORY; MONTE CARLO ALGORITHMS;

DROPS; GLASS FORMING MACHINES; LIQUIDS; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

GLASS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COLD; FREEZING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHASE TRANSITION; THERMODYNAMICS;

ALGORITHMS; COLD TEMPERATURE; FREEZING; GLASS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHASE TRANSITION; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84862573593     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.4720477     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. G. Adam and J. H. Gibbs, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 139 (1965). 10.1063/1.1696442
2. D. Kivelson, G. Tarjus, and S. A. Kivelson, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 126, 289 (1997). 10.1143/PTPS.126.289
3. J.-P. Bouchaud and G. Biroli, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 7347 (2004). 10.1063/1.1796231
4. A. Cavagna, T. S. Grigera, and P. Verrocchio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 187801 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.187801
5. A. Widmer-Cooper, H. Perry, P. Harrowell, and D. R. Reichman, Nat. Phys. 4, 711 (2008). 10.1038/nphys1025
6. H. Tanaka, T. Kawasaki, H. Shintani, and K. Watanabe, Nature Mater. 9, 324 (2010). 10.1038/nmat2634
7. D. Coslovich, Phys. Rev. E 83, 051505 (2011). 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.051505
8. G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, A. Cavagna, T. S. Grigera, and P. Verrocchio, Nat. Phys. 4, 771 (2008). 10.1038/nphys1050
9. M. Mézard and A. Montanari, J. Stat. Phys. 124, 1317 (2006). 10.1007/s10955-006-9162-3
10. A. Montanari and G. Semerjian, J. Stat. Phys. 125, 23 (2006). 10.1007/s10955-006-9175-y
11. W. Kob, S. Roldán-Vargas, and L. Berthier, Nat. Phys. 8, 164 (2012). 10.1038/nphys2133
12. B. Bernu, J. P. Hansen, Y. Hiwatari, and G. Pastore, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4891 (1987). 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.4891
13. Y. Brumer and D. R. Reichman, Phys. Rev. E 69, 041202 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.041202
14. T. S. Grigera, A. Cavagna, I. Giardina, and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 055502 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.055502
15. G. Biroli and J. P. Bouchaud, The random first-order transition theory of glasses: A critical assessment., e-print arXiv:0912.2542.
16. T. S. Grigera and G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. E 63, 045102 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.045102
17. G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, K. Miyazaki, and D. R. Reichman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 195701 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.195701
18. J. D. Stevenson and P. G. Wolynes, Nat. Phys. 6, 62 (2010). 10.1038/nphys1432
19. M. Dzero, J. Schmalian, and P. G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. B 72, 100201 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.100201
20. C. Cammarota, A. Cavagna, G. Gradenigo, T. S. Grigera, and P. Verrocchio, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2009, L12002 (2009). 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/12/ L12002
21. C. Cammarota, A. Cavagna, G. Gradenigo, T. S. Grigera, and P. Verrocchio, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 194901 (2009). 10.1063/1.3257739
22. C. Cammarota, A. Cavagna, I. Giardina, G. Gradenigo, T. S. Grigera, G. Parisi, and P. Verrocchio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 055703 (2010). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.055703
23. L. Berthier and W. Kob, Phys. Rev. E 85, 011102 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.011102
24. C. Cammarota and G. Biroli, Ideal glass transitions by random pinning., e-print arXiv:1106.5513.
25. D. Chandler and J. P. Garrahan, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 191 (2010). 10.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090405
26. R. L. Jack and J. P. Garrahan, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 164508 (2005). 10.1063/1.2075067
27. W. Götze and L. Sjorgen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 241 (1992). 10.1088/0034-4885/55/3/001
28. L. A. Fernández, V. Martín-Mayor, and P. Verrocchio, Phys. Rev. E 73, 020501 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.020501
29. S. Franz and A. Montanari, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, F251 (2007). 10.1088/1751-8113/40/11/F01
30. R. L. Jack and L. Berthier, Phys. Rev. E 85, 021120 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021120
31. J. C. Dyre, N. B. Olsen, and T. Christensen, Phys. Rev. B 53, 2171 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.2171
32. A. J. Kabla and T. J. Senden, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 228301 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.228301
33. T. R. Kirkpatrick, D. Thirumalai, and P. G. Wolynes, Phys. Rev. A 40, 1045 (1989). 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1045
34. G. Liu, Y.-Z. Li, and J. Jonas, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5881 (1989). 10.1063/1.456397
35. J. Zhang, G. Liu, and J. Jonas, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3478 (1992). 10.1021/j100187a056
36. M. Arndt, R. Stannarius, H. Groothues, E. Hempel, and F. Kremer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2077 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2077
37. J. C. Rasaiah, S. Garde, and G. Hummer, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59, 713 (2008). 10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093815
38. A. D. Sokal, in Functional Integration: Basics and Applications (1996 Cargèse School), edited by, C. DeWitt-Morette, P. Cartier, and, A. Folacci, (Plenum, New York, 1997).
39. R. N. Bhatt and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 37, 5606 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.5606
40. H. G. Katzgraber, M. Palassini, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 63, 184422 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.184422
41. β on R due to the extended nature of the excitations related to β-relaxation.
42. In fact, both surface tension and configurational entropy will fluctuate. At the practical level, though, disentangling the two effects is hard, and given that large surface tension fluctuations have been reported, a generalized version of RFOT that incorporates only surface tension fluctuations seems reasonable.
43. This is a general prediction of our picture: by lowering the temperature we are gradually pushing up (and therefore ruling out) the MCT branch, diminishing the hybridization of the two branches and therefore eliminating the overshooting. At very low T, τ should be a purely increasing function of R.
44. We remark, though, that the FC results reported above are in fact obtained with bona fide freezing.
45. Strictly, this means that exchanges of particles of different kind do not happen, but same-kind exchanges should be similarly hindered.
46. This decoupling is also found in FC swap dynamics-not shown-where it is naturally expected since the swap moves consist precisely in the exchange of two particles of different size.