Comparing the responsiveness of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills and the Functional Independence Measure

Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 167-174

  Fioravanti, Andrea M ^a,b   Bordignon, Candace M ^b,c   Pettit, Susan M ^d   Woodhouse, Linda J ^e,f,g   Ansley, Barbara J ^d  

^a Pace Homecare   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Closing the Gap Health Care Group   (Canada)

^d HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^g GLENROSE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS); Functional Independence Measure (FIM); Program evaluation; Rehabilitation; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; REHABILITATION CENTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; REHABILITATION CENTERS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84862549956     PISSN: 00084174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.6     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Beninato, M., Gill-Body, K. M., Salles, S., Stark, P., Black-Schaffer, R. M., & Stein, J. (2006). Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM Instrument in patients with stroke. Achives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 87, 32-39. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130 (Pubitemid 43053301)
2. Bernspang, B., & Fisher, A. G. (1995). Differences between persons with right or left CVA on the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 1144-1151.
3. Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2007a). Introduction to the National Rehabilitation Reporting System. Retrieved from http://www.cihi.ca/ cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw-page=services-nrs-intro-e
4. Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2007b). Rehabilitation Minimum Data Set manual: Adult inpatient services, February 2008. Ottawa, ON: Author.
5. Chard, G. (2000). An investigation into the use of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in clinical practice. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 481-488.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Dickerson, A. E., & Fisher, A. G. (1993). Age differences in functional performance. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 686-692.
8. Doble, S., Fisk, J., Lewis, N., & Rockwood, K. (1999). Test-retest reliability of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills in elderly adults. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 19, 203-215. (Pubitemid 29342874)
9. Dodds, T. A., Martin, D. P., Stolov, W. C., & Deyo, R. A. (1993). A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archive Physical Medical Rehabilitation, 74, 531-536. (Pubitemid 23141404)
10. Dromerick, A. W., Edwards, D. F., Diringer, M. N. (2003). Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: A comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 40(1), 1-8. (Pubitemid 36337060)
11. Fisher, A. G. (2003). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills Volume 1: Development, standardization and administration manual (6th ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
12. Fitzpatrick, R., Ziebland, S., Jenkinson, C., Mowat, A., & Mowat, A. (1992). Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. Quality in Health Care, 1, 89-93.
13. Granger, C. V. (1998). The emerging science of functional assessment: Our tool for outcomes analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 235-240. (Pubitemid 28207108)
14. Guyatt, G. H., Deyo, R. A., Charlson, M., Levine, M. N., & Mitchell, A. (1989). Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: A clarification. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(5), 403-408. (Pubitemid 19165904)
15. Kennedy, D. M., Stratford, P. W., Wessel, J., Gollish, J. D., & Penney, D. (2005). Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: A longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 6 (3). doi:10.1186/1471-2474-6-3 (Pubitemid 40300841)
16. Kirkley, K. N., & Fisher, A. G. (1999). Alternate forms reliability of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3, 53-70.
17. Letts, L., Law, M., Pollock, N., Stewart, D., Westmorland, M., Philpot, A., & Bosch, J. (1999). A program evaluation workbook for occupational therapists: An evidence-based practice tool. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
18. Linden, A., Boschian, K., Eker, C., Schalen, W., & Nordstrom, C. (2005). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills reflects braininjured patients' ability to resume independent living better than neuropsychological tests. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 111, 48-53.
19. MacDermid, J., & Micholvitz, S. (2008). Incorporating outcomes measures into evidence-based practice. In M. Law & J. MacDermid (Eds.), Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice (2nd ed., pp. 63-94). Thorofare, NJ: Slack..
20. Oakley, F., & Sunderland, T. (1997). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills as a measure of IADL functioning in pharmacologic studies of people with Alzheimer's Disease: A pilot study. International Psychogeriatrics, 9, 197-206. (Pubitemid 27455502)
21. Ottenbacher, K. J., Hsu, Y., Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 1226-1232. (Pubitemid 26424833)
22. PASW Statistics 18, Rel. 18.0.0. [Computer software]. (2009). Chicago: SPSS.
23. Robinson, S. E., & Fisher, A. G. (1996). A study to examine the relationship of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) to other tests of cognition and function. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 260-263. (Pubitemid 126432397)
24. Tomita, M. R. (2006). Methods of analysis: From univariate to multivariate statistics. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Research in Occupational Therapy (pp. 243-280). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
25. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. (1999). The FIMTM video: Assessing function with the FIMTM instrument. Buffalo, NY: Author.
26. van der Putten, J. J. M. F., Hobart, J. C., Freeman, J. A., & Thompson, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 66, 480-484. (Pubitemid 29145683)