|
Volumn 33 Suppl 1, Issue , 2012, Pages
|
Liver tumor characterization--review of the literature.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONTRAST AGENT BR1;
CONTRAST MEDIUM;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
PHOSPHOLIPID;
SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
BILE DUCT CARCINOMA;
BILE DUCT TUMOR;
CHILD;
CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC);
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS;
ECHOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HEMANGIOMA;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT;
LIVER CELL CARCINOMA;
LIVER TUMOR;
MALE;
METASTASIS;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NODULAR HYPERPLASIA;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
REVIEW;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
VASCULARIZATION;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS;
BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC;
CARCINOMA, HEPATOCELLULAR;
CHILD;
CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA;
CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
FEMALE;
FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA;
HEMANGIOMA;
HUMANS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
LIVER NEOPLASMS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHOSPHOLIPIDS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 84862528750
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14388782
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (43)
|
References (0)
|