Reply to Francis: Cumulative power calculations are faulty when based on observed power and a small sample of studies

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 25, 2012, Pages

  Piff, Paul K ^a   Stancato, Daniel M ^a   Côté, Stéphane ^b   Mendoza Denton, Rodolfo ^a   Keltner, Dacher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; EFFECT SIZE; ETHICS; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RANDOM ERROR; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 84862518239     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1205367109     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Francis G (2012) Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies relating social class and unethical behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E1587.
2. Piff PK, Stancato DM, Côté S, Mendoza-Denton R, Keltner D (2012) Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:4086-4091.
3. Ioannidis JPA, Trikalinos TA (2007) An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clin Trials 4:245-253.
4. Wilkinson L; APA Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. Am Psychol 54:594-604.
5. Ioannidis JPA, Trikalinos TA (2007) The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey. CMAJ 176:1091-1096.