Automatic and Semi-Automatic Skill Coding With a View Towards Supporting On-Line Assessment

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 125, Issue , 2005, Pages 571-578

  Rosé, Carolyn ^a   Donmez, Pinar ^a   Gweon, Gahgene ^a   Knight, Andrea ^a   Junker, Brian ^a   Cohen, William ^a   Koedinger, Kenneth ^a   Heffernan, Neil ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); CODES (SYMBOLS); TEXT PROCESSING;

CLASSIFICATION APPROACH; IMPROVING PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; ON-LINE ASSESSMENT; ONLINE TESTS; SEMI-AUTOMATICS; SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE; TEACHERS'; TEST PERFORMANCE; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84862491099     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Baker R.S., Corbett A.T., Koedinger K.R., Schneider, M.P. (2003). A Formative Evaluation of a Tutor for Scatterplot Generation: Evidence on Difficulty Factors. Proceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 107-115.
2. Cohen, W. and Singer, Y. (1996). Context-sentsitive learning methods for text categorization, In SIGIR'96: Proc. 19th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 307-315.
3. Cohen, W. (2004). Minorthird: Methods for Identifying Names and Ontological Relations in Text using Heuristics for Inducing Regularities from Data, http://minorthird.sourceforge.net.
4. DiBello, L. and Crone, C. (2001, July). Enhanced Score Reporting on A National Standardized Test. Paper presented at the International meeting of the Psychometric Society, Osaka, Japan.
5. Donmez, P., Rose, C. P., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., and Fischer, F. (to appear). Supporting CSCL with Automatic Corpus Analysis Technology, to appear in the Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
6. Dumais, S., Platt, J., Heckerman, D. and Sahami, M. (1998). Inductive Learning Algorithms and Representations for Text Categorization, Technical Report, Microsoft Research.
7. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features, In Proc. 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML), Springer Verlag, 1998.
8. Massachusetts Department of Education (2003). 2002 MCAS Technical Report. Malden, MA: Author. Obtained August 2004 from http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/2003/news/02techrpt.pdf
9. Lewis, D. and Ringuette, R. (1994). A Comparison of teo learning algorithms for text classification, In Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, pp. 81-93.
10. Mead, R., Smith, R. M. and Swandlund, A. (2003). Technical analysis: Pennsylvania System of School Assessment, Mathematics and Reading. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Education. Obtained August 2004 from http://www.pde.state.pa.us/a_and_t/lib/a_and_t/TechManualCover.pdf.
11. Wittwer, J., Nückles, M., Renkl, A. Can experts benefit from information about a layperson's knowledge for giving adaptive explanations?. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, T. Regier (Eds.), Proc. Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2004. 1464-1469.
12. Yang, Y. and Pedersen, J. (1997). Feature selection in statistical learning of text categorization, In the 14th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp 412-420.
13. Yan, D., Almond, R. and Mislevy, R. J. (2004). A comparison of two models for cognitive diagnosis. Educational Testing Service research report #RR-04-02. Obtained August 2004 from http://www.ets.org/research/dload/RIBRR-04-02.pdf