Devolution: Comparative development and policy roles

Parliamentary Affairs

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Mitchell, James ^b   Bradbury, Jonathan ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862401353     PISSN: 00312290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsh028     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. T.J. Lowi, 'American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory', World Politics, 1964, 715; 'Four Systems of Policy Politics and Choice', Public Administration Review, 1972; J. Mitchell, 'What Could a Scottish Parliament Do?' in H. Elcock and M. Keating (eds), Remaking the Union, Frank Cass, 1998; 'Scotland: Expectations, Policy Types and Devolution' in A. Trench (ed.), The State and the Nations 2004, Imprint Academic, 2004.
2. T.J. Lowi, 'American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory', World Politics, 1964, 715; 'Four Systems of Policy Politics and Choice', Public Administration Review, 1972; J. Mitchell, 'What Could a Scottish Parliament Do?' in H. Elcock and M. Keating (eds), Remaking the Union, Frank Cass, 1998; 'Scotland: Expectations, Policy Types and Devolution' in A. Trench (ed.), The State and the Nations 2004, Imprint Academic, 2004.
3. T.J. Lowi, 'American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory', World Politics, 1964, 715; 'Four Systems of Policy Politics and Choice', Public Administration Review, 1972; J. Mitchell, 'What Could a Scottish Parliament Do?' in H. Elcock and M. Keating (eds), Remaking the Union, Frank Cass, 1998; 'Scotland: Expectations, Policy Types and Devolution' in A. Trench (ed.), The State and the Nations 2004, Imprint Academic, 2004.
4. T.J. Lowi, 'American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory', World Politics, 1964, 715; 'Four Systems of Policy Politics and Choice', Public Administration Review, 1972; J. Mitchell, 'What Could a Scottish Parliament Do?' in H. Elcock and M. Keating (eds), Remaking the Union, Frank Cass, 1998; 'Scotland: Expectations, Policy Types and Devolution' in A. Trench (ed.), The State and the Nations 2004, Imprint Academic, 2004.
5. D. Bell and A. Christie, 'Finance: The Barnett Formula: Nobody's Child?' in A. Trench (ed.), The State of the Nations 2001: The Second Year of Devolution in the United Kingdom, Imprint Academic.
6. See R. Rawlings, Delineating Wales, Constitutional, Legal and Administrative Aspects of National Devolution, University of Wales Press, 2003.
7. S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, Collier/Macmillan, 1967.
8. R. Wilford, 'Finance' in Devolution Monitoring Programme Northern Ireland Report 17, Constitution Unit, University College London, November 2003, p. 34.
9. See e.g. C. Jeffery and J. Mawson, 'Beyond the White Paper on the English Regions' Regional Studies, 2002.
10. 'Parliaments for the North: Prescott takes plans to the people', Independent, 4.11.03.
11. J. Bradbury, 'The Political Dynamics of Substate Regionalisation: A Neo-Functionalist Perspective and the Case of Devolution in the UK', British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2003.