Prediction of maxVO 2 for women: Adaptation of the Fox cycle ergometer protocol

Journal of Exercise Physiology Online

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1999, Pages

  Darby, Lynn A ^a   Pohlman, Roberta L ^b  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Heart rate; Prediction; Submaximal exercise testing; Women

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BICYCLE ERGOMETER; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; EXHAUSTION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REST; SAMPLE; TECHNIQUE; TIME; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84862393432     PISSN: 10979751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fox EL. A simple, accurate technique for predicting maximal aerobic power. J Appl Physiol 1973; 35: 914-916
2. Heyward VH. Advanced fitness assessment & exercise prescription. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998
3. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995
4. Astrand P-O, Ryhming I. A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fitness) from pulse rate during submaximal work. J Appl Physiol 1954; 7: 218-221
5. Kasch FW. The validity of the Astrand and Sjøstrand submaximal tests. Phys Sports Med 1984; 12: 47-52
6. Montoye HJ, Ayen T, Washburn, RA. The estimation of VO2 max from maximal and submaximal measurements in males, age 10-39. Res Qrtrly 1986; 57: 250-253
7. Astrand P-O, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology: physiological bases of exercise. New York: McGraw-Hill book Company, 1986: 363-390
8. Fox EL, Bowers RW, Foss ML. The physiological basis of physical education and athletics. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing, 1988
9. Wilmore JH. The use of actual, predicted and constant residual volumes in the assessment of body composition by underwater weighing. Med Sci Sports 1969; 1: 87-90
10. Brozek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, Keys A. Densiometric analysis of body composition: revision of some quantitative assumptions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1963; 110: 113-140
11. Vincent, WJ. Statistics in kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1995
12. Jones NL, Makrides L, Hitchcock C, Chypchar T, McCartney N. Normal standard for an incremental progressive cycle ergometer test. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985:131: 700-708
13. 2max in cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990: 22: 704-712
14. Adams, GM. Exercise physiology laboratory manual. Boston, MA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1998;147
15. Wells C. Women, sport & performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1985
16. 2 max. Med Sci Sports 1973; 5: 156-160
17. Davies CTM. Limitations to the prediction of maximum oxygen uptake from cardiac frequency measures. J Appl Physiol 1968:24: 700-706
18. Lang PB, Latin RW, Berg KE, Mellion MB. The accuracy of the ACSM cycle ergometry equation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992: 24:272-276
19. 2. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993:25: 970-974
20. Cardus D. Exercise testing: methods and uses. In: RS Hutton, editor,. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. USA: Franklin Institute Press, 1978: 6: 59-103
21. Sharkey BJ. Specificity of testing. In: Grana WA, editor. Advances in sports medicine and fitness. Chicago, IL: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1988: 23-44