Condition and brightness of structural blue-green: Motmot tail-racket brightness is related to speed of feather growth in males, but not in females

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 673-681

  Murphy, Troy G ^a   Pham, Tiffany T ^a  

^a TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Condition dependence; Growth bars; Mutual ornamentation; Structural coloration

Indexed keywords

BIRD; COLOR; CONDITION FACTOR; FEATHER; MATE CHOICE; ORNAMENTATION; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SEXUAL SELECTION;

AVES; EUMOMOTA SUPERCILIOSA;

EID: 84862332255     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01891.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Alonso-Alvarez C, Bertrand S, Devevey G, Gaillard M, Prost J, Faivre B, Sorci G. 2004. An experimental test of the dose-dependent effect of carotenoids and immune activation on sexual signals and antioxidant activity. The American Naturalist 164: 651-659.
2. Amundsen T. 2000a. Why are female birds ornamented. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 149-155.
3. Amundsen T. 2000b. Female ornaments: genetically correlated or sexually selected. In: Amundsen T, Espmark Y, Rosenqvist G, eds. Animal signals: signaling and signal design in animal communication. Norway: Tapir Academic Press, 133-154.
4. Amundsen T, Forsgren E. 2001. Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 13155-13160.
5. Amundsen T, Forsgren E, Hansen LTT. 1997. On the function of female ornaments: male bluethroats prefer colourful females. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 264: 1579-1586.
6. Amundsen T, Pärn H. 2006. Female colouration in birds: a review of functional and non-functional hypotheses. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ, eds. Bird coloration volume 2: function and evolution. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 280-345.
7. Andersson S. 1999. Morphology of UV reflectance in a whistling-thrush: implications for the study of structural colour signalling in birds. Journal of Avian Biology 30: 193-204.
8. Andersson S, Örnborg J, Andersson M. 1998. Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 265: 445-450.
9. Budden AE, Dickinson JL. 2009. Signals of quality and age: the information content of multiple plumage ornaments in male western bluebirds Sialia mexicana. Journal of Avian Biology 40: 18-27.
10. Clotfelter E, Ardia DR, McGraw KJ. 2007. Red fish, blue fish: trade-offs between pigmentation and immunity in Betta splendens. Behavioral Ecology 18: 1139-1145.
11. Clutton-Brock T. 2007. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318: 1882-1885.
12. Cuervo JJ, de Lope F, Møller A. 1996. The function of long tails in female barn swallows (Hirundo rustica): an experimental study. Behavioral Ecology 7: 132-136.
13. Dale J. 2006. Intraspecific variation in colouration. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ, eds. Bird coloration volume 2: function and evolution. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 36-86.
14. Darwin C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
15. Domb LG, Pagel M. 2001. Sexual swellings advertise female quality in wild baboons. Nature 410: 204-206.
16. Doucet SM. 2002. Structural plumage colouration, male body size, and condition in the blue-black grassquit. Condor 104: 30-38.
17. Doucet SM, Montgomerie R. 2003. Structural plumage colour and parasites in satin bowerbirds Ptilonorhynchus violaceus: implications for sexual selection. Journal of Avian Biology 34: 237-242.
18. Doucet SM, Shawkey MD, Hill GE, Montgomerie R. 2006. Iridescent plumage in satin bowerbirds: structure, mechanisms and nanostructural predictors of individual variation in colour. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 209: 380-390.
19. Doutrelant C, Grégoire A, Grnac N, Gomez D, Lambrechts MM, Perret P. 2008. Female coloration indicates female reproductive capacity in blue tits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 226-233.
20. Dufresne ER, Noh H, Saranathan V, Mochrie SGJ, Cao H, Prum RO. 2009. Self-assembly of amorphous biophotonic nanostructures by phase separation. Soft Matter 5: 1792-1795.
21. Dyck J. 1971. Structure and spectral reflectance of green and blue feathers of the Rose-faced Lovebird (Agapornis roseicollis). Biologiske Skrifter 18: 1-67.
22. Finger E, Burkhardt D, Dyck J. 1992. Avian plumage colours: origin of UV reflection in a black parrot. Die Naturwissenschaften Origin of UV reflection in a black parrot, 79: 187-188.
23. Fitzpatrick S. 1998. Colour schemes for birds: structural coloration and signals of quality in feathers. Annales Zoologici Fennici 35: 67-77.
24. Götmark F. 1993. Conspicuous coloration in male birds is favoured by predation in some species and disfavoured in others. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 253: 143-146.
25. Griggio M, Serra L, Licheri D, Campomori C, Pilastro A. 2009. Moult speed affects structural feather ornaments in the blue tit. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 782-792.
26. Griggio M, Valera F, Casas A, Pilastro A. 2005. Males prefer ornamented females: a field experiment of male choice in the rock sparrow. Animal Behaviour 69: 1243-1250.
27. Grubb TC. 1989. Ptilochronology: feather growth bars as indicators of nutritional status. The Auk 106: 314-320.
28. Grubb TC. 1991. A deficient diet narrows growth bars on induced feathers. The Auk 108: 725-727.
29. Hanssen SA, Hasselquist D, Folstad I, Erikstad KE. 2008. A label of health: a previous immune challenge is reflected in the expression of a female plumage trait. Biology Letters 4: 379-381.
30. Harper D. 1999. Feather mites, pectoral muscle condition, wing length and plumage coloration of passerines. Animal Behaviour 58: 553-562.
31. Heinsohn R, Legge S, Endler JA. 2005. Extreme reversed sexual dichromatism in a bird without sex role reversal. Science 309: 617-619.
32. Hill GE. 1990. Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Animal Behaviour 40: 563-572.
33. Hill GE. 1991. Plumage colouration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350: 337-339.
34. Hill GE. 2006. Environmental regulation of ornamental color. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ, eds. Bird coloration volume 1: mechanisms and measurements. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 507.
35. Hill GE, Doucet SM, Buchholz R. 2005. The effect of coccidial infection on iridescent plumage colouration in wild turkeys. Animal Behaviour 69: 387-394.
36. Hõrak P, Zilmer M, Saks L, Ots I, Karu U, Zilmer K. 2006. Antioxidant protection, carotenoids and the costs of immune challenge in greenfinches. Journal of Experimental Biology 209: 4329-4338.
37. Hunt S, Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Griffiths R. 1999. Preferences for ultraviolet partners in the blue tit. Animal Behaviour 58: 809-815.
38. Jawor JM, Linville SU, Beall SM, Breitwisch R. 2003. Assortative mating by multiple ornaments in northern cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis). Behavioral Ecology 14: 515-520.
39. Jenkins KD, Hawley DM, Farabaugh CS, Cristol DA. 2001. ptilochronology reveals differences in condition of captive white-throated sparrows. Condor 103: 579-586.
40. Jones IL, Hunter FM. 1993. Mutual sexual selection in a monogamous seabird. Nature 362: 238-239.
41. Keyser AJ, Hill GE. 1999. Condition-dependent variation in the blue-ultraviolet colouration of a structurally based plumage ornament. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266: 771-777.
42. Keyser AJ, Hill GE. 2000. Structurally based plumage colouration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks. Behavioral Ecology 11: 202-209.
43. Kraaijeveld K, Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Komdeur J. 2007. The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Animal Behaviour 74: 657-677.
44. Lande R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
45. LeBas NR. 2006. Female finery is not for males. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 170-173.
46. Lessells CM, Boag PT. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities - a common mistake. The Auk 104: 116-121.
47. Martínez-Padilla J, Vergara P, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Mougeot F, Casas F, Ludwig SC, Haines JA, Zeineddine M, Redpath SM. 2011. Condition- and parasite-dependent expression of a male-like trait in a female bird. Biology Letters 7: 364-367.
48. McGraw KJ, Ardia DR. 2003. Carotenoids, immunocompetence, and the information content of sexual colours: an experimental test. The American Naturalist 162: 704-712.
49. McGraw KJ, Hudon J, Hill GE, Parker RS. 2005. A simple and inexpensive chemical test for behavioral ecologists to determine the presence of carotenoid pigments in animal tissues. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57: 391-397.
50. McGraw KJ, Mackillop EA, Dale J, Hauber ME. 2002. Different colours reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 205: 3747-3755.
51. McGraw KJ, Nolan PM, Crino OL. 2006. Carotenoid accumulation strategies for becoming a colourful House Finch: analyses of plasma and liver pigments in wild moulting birds. Functional Ecology 20: 678-688.
52. Montgomerie R. 2006. Analyzing colours. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ, eds. Bird coloration volume 2: function and evolution. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 90-147.
53. Montgomerie R. 2008. CLR, version 1.05. Kingston (Canada): Queen's University. Available at:.
54. Muma KE, Weatherhead PJ. 1989. Male traits expressed in females: direct or indirect sexual selection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25: 23-31.
55. Murphy TG. 2006. Predator-elicited visual signal: why the turquoise-browed motmot wag-displays its racketed tail. Behavioral Ecology 17: 547-553.
56. Murphy TG. 2007. Racketed tail of the male and female turquoise-browed motmot: male but not female tail length correlates with pairing success, performance, and reproductive success. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61: 911-918.
57. Murphy TG. 2008. Lack of assortative mating for tail, body size, or condition in the elaborate monomorphic turquoise-browed motmot (Eumomota superciliosa). The Auk 125: 11-19.
58. Noh H, Liew S, Saranathan V, Prum R, Mochrie G, Dufresne E, Cao H. 2010. Double scattering of light from biophotonic nanostructures with short-range order. Optics Express 18: 11942-11948.
59. Nolan PM, Dobson FS, Nicolaus M, Karels TJ, McGraw KJ, Jouventin P. 2010. Mutual mate choice for colourful traits in king penguins. Ethology 116: 635-644.
60. Peters A, Kurvers RHJM, Roberts ML, Delhey K. 2011. No evidence for general condition-dependence of structural plumage colour in blue tits: an experiment. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 976-987.
61. Potti J, Merino S. 1996. Decreased levels of blood trypanosome infection correlate with female expression of a male secondary sexual trait: implications for sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 263: 1199-1204.
62. Prum RO. 2006. Anatomy, physics and evolution of avian structural colours. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ, eds. Bird coloration volume 1. Mechanisms and measurements. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 295-353.
63. Prum RO, Torres R, Williamson S, Dyck J. 1999. Two-dimensional Fourier analysis of the spongy medullary keratin of structurally coloured feather barbs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266: 13-22.
64. Roulin A, Jungi TW, Pfister H, Dijkstra C. 2000. Female barn owls (Tyto alba) advertise good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 267: 937-941.
65. Scott PE, Martin RF. 1983. Reproduction of the turquoise-browed motmot Eumomota superciliosa at archaeological ruins in Yucatan Mexico. Biotropica 15: 8-14.
66. Shawkey MD, Estes A, Siefferman L, Hill GE. 2005. The anatomical basis of sexual dichromatism in non-iridescent ultraviolet-blue structural coloration of feathers. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 259-271.
67. Shawkey MD, Estes AM, Siefferman LM, Hill GE. 2003. Nanostructure predicts intraspecific variation in ultraviolet-blue plumage colour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 1455-1460.
68. Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Örnborg J, Sendecka J. 1999. Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402: 874-877.
69. Siefferman L, Hill GE. 2005. Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage colouration in female eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Evolution 59: 1819-1828.
70. Siefferman L, Wang YJ, Wang YP, Yuan HW. 2007. Sexual dichromatism, dimorphism, and condition-dependent colouration in Blue-tailed Bee-eaters. Condor 109: 577-584.
71. Siitari H, Alatalo R, Halme P, Buchanan K, Kilpimaa J. 2007. Color signals in the black grouse (Tetrao tetrix): signal properties and their condition dependency. American Naturalist 169: Suppl 1, S81-S92.
72. South SH, Arnqvist G. 2011. Male, but not female, preference for an ornament expressed in both sexes of the polygynous mosquito Sabethes cyaneus. Animal Behaviour 81: 645-651.
73. Torres R, Velando A. 2005. Male preference for female foot colour in the socially monogamous blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. Animal Behaviour 69: 59-65.
74. Velando A, Lessells CM, Márquez JC. 2001. The function of female and male ornaments in the Inca tern: evidence for links between ornament expression and both adult condition and reproductive performance. Journal of Avian Biology 32: 311-318.
75. Wolf WL, Casto JM, Nolan V, Ketterson ED. 2004. Female ornamentation and male mate choice in dark-eyed juncos. Animal Behaviour 67: 93-102.