Reduced-order modeling for cardiac electrophysiology. Application to parameter identification

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 6-7, 2012, Pages 727-744

  Boulakia, M ^a   Schenone, E ^a,b   Gerbeau, J F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Cardiac electrophysiology; Inverse problem; POD; Reduced order model

Indexed keywords

BIDOMAIN EQUATION; CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; IONIC PARAMETERS; POD; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITIONS; REDUCED ORDER MODELS; REDUCED-ORDER MODELING; RESTITUTION CURVE;

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; NEUROLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART; HEART ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HEART FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ALGORITHMS; CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC TECHNIQUES, CARDIAC; HEART; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR;

EID: 84862327451     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2465     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Colli Franzone P, Pavarino LF. A parallel solver for reaction-diffusion systems in computational electrocardiology. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 2004; 14(6):883-911.
2. Scacchi S, Pavarino LF, Milano I. Multilevel Schwarz and multigrid preconditioners for the bidomain system. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering 2008; 60:631.
3. Clements J, Nenonen J, Li PKJ, Horacek BM. Activation dynamics in anisotropic cardiac tissue via decoupling. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2004; 32(7):984-990.
4. Colli Franzone P, Pavarino LF, Taccardi B. Simulating patterns of excitation, repolarization and action potential duration with cardiac bidomain and monodomain models. Mathematical Biosciences 2005; 197(1):35-66.
5. Keener JP. An Eikonal-curvature equation for action potential propagation in myocardium. Journal of mathematical biology 1991; 29(7):629-651.
6. Tomlinson KA, Hunter PJ, Pullan AJ. A finite element method for an Eikonal equation model of myocardial excitation wavefront propagation. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 2002; 63(1):324-350.
7. Neu JC, Krassowska W. Homogenization of syncytial tissues. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1993; 21(2):137-199.
8. Pennacchio M, Savaré G, Colli Franzone P. Multiscale modeling for the bioelectric activity of the heart. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 2005; 37(4):1333-1370.
9. Sachse FB. Computational Cardiology: Modeling of Anatomy, Electrophysiology, and Mechanics. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2004.
10. Sundnes J, Lines GT, Cai X, Nielsen BF, Mardal K-A, Tveito A. Computing the Electrical Activity in the Heart. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2006.
11. Mitchell CC, Schaeffer DG. A two-current model for the dynamics of cardiac membrane. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 2003; 65:767-793.
12. Boulakia M, Cazeau S, Fernández MA, Gerbeau J-F, Zemzemi N. Mathematical modeling of electrocardiograms: A numerical study. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010; 38(3):1071-1097.
13. Austin TM, Trew ML, Pullan AJ. Solving the cardiac bidomain equations for discontinuous conductivities. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2006; 53(7):1265-72.
14. Ethier M, Bourgault Y. Semi-implicit time-discretization schemes for the bidomain model. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2008; 46:2443.
15. Lines GT, Grøttum P, Tveito A. Modeling the electrical activity of the heart: A bidomain model of the ventricles embedded in a torso. Computing and Visualization in Science 2003; 5(4):195-213.
16. Sundnes J, Lines GT, Tveito A. Efficient solution of ordinary differential equations modeling electrical activity in cardiac cells. Mathematical Biosciences 2001; 172(2):55-72.
17. Keener JP, Bogar K. A numerical method for the solution of the bidomain equations in cardiac tissue. Chaos 1998; 8(1):234-241.
18. Sundnes J, Lines GT, Tveito A. An operator splitting method for solving the bidomain equations coupled to a volume conductor model for the torso. Mathematical Biosciences 2005; 194(2):233-248.
19. Vigmond EJ, Weber dos Santos R, Prassl AJ, Deo M, Plank G. Solvers for the cardiac bidomain equations. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 2008; 96(1-3):3-18.
20. Kunisch K, Volkwein S. Galerkin proper orthogonal decomposition methods for parabolic problems. Numerische Mathematik 2001; 90(1):117-148.
21. Rathinam M, Petzold LR. A new look at proper orthogonal decomposition. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2004; 41(5):1893-1925.
22. Amsallem D, Farhat C. Interpolation method for adapting reduced-order models and application to aeroelasticity. AIAA Journal-American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2008; 46(7):1803-1813.
23. Chaturantabut S, Sorensen DC. Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2010; 32(5):2737-2764.
24. Grepl MA, Maday Y, Nguyen NC, Patera AT. Efficient reduced-basis treatment of nonaffine and nonlinear partial differential equations. M2AN Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 2007; 41(3):575-605.
25. Sermesant M, Moireau PH, Camara O, Sainte-Marie J, Andriantsimiavona R, Cimrman R, Hill DL, Chapelle D, Razavi R. Cardiac function estimation from MRI using a heart model and data assimilation: Advances and difficulties. Med. Image Anal. 2006; 10(4):642-656.
26. Qu Z, Xie Y, Garfinkel A, Weiss JN. T-wave alternans and arrhythmogenesis in cardiac diseases. Frontiers in physiology 2010; 1. art 154.
27. Manriquez AI, Zhang Q, Medigue C, Papelier Y, Sonne M. Electrocardiogram-based restitution curve. Computers in cardiology, 2006, Valencia, Spain, IEEE, 2008; 493-496.
28. Potse M, Coronel R, LeBlanc AR. The role of extracellular potassium transport in computer models of ischemic zone. Med Bio Eng Comput 2007; 45:1187-1199.
29. Dubin D. Rapid Interpretation of EKGs: An interactive course. Cover Publishing Company, 2000.
30. Potse M, Coronel R, Falcao S, LeBlanc AR, Vinet A. The effect of lesion size and tissue remodeling on ST deviation in partial-thickness ischemia. Heart Rhythm 2007; 4:200-206.
31. Dumas L, El Alaoui L. How genetic algorithms can improve a pacemaker efficiency. Proceedings of GECCO 2007, London, England UK, 2007; 2681-2686.
32. Cagnoni S, Smith S (eds). Medical Applications of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, chapter How Genetic Algorithms can improve a pacemaker efficiency, John Wiley and Sons, 2010.
33. Nielsen BF, Lysaker M, Tveito A. On the use of the resting potential and level set methods for identifying ischemic heart disease: An inverse problem. Journal of Computation Physics 2007; 220(2):772-790.
34. Goletsis Y, Papaloukas C, Fotiadis DI, Likas A, Michalis LK. Automated ischemic beat classification using genetic algorithms and multicriteria decision analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2004; 51(10):1717-1725.
35. Boulakia M, Gerbeau J-F. Parameter identification in cardiac electrophysiology using proper orthogonal decomposition method. In Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, Sachse FB, Seemann G (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2011. To appear.