Socio-spatial Inequalities and Social Cohesion in European Cities

Urban Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1909-1924

  Cassiers, Tim ^a   Kesteloot, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY CARE; POLICY MAKING; SOCIAL PROBLEM; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN POLICY;

EUROPE;

EID: 84862317119     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012444888     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Abramo P.La ville Kaléidoscopique: coordination spatiale et Convention urbaine. Paris: L'Harmattan; 1998:.
2. Abu-Lughod J. L.New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1999:.
3. Amin A.,Thomas A.The negotiated economy: state and civic institutions in Denmark.Economy and Society. 1996;25:255-281.
4. Andersson R.'Breaking segregation'-rhetorical construct or effective policy? The case of the metropolitan development initiative in Sweden.Urban Studies. 2006;43:787-799.
5. Bailey N.,Livingston M.Selective migration and neighbourhood deprivation: evidence from 2001 census migration data for England and Scotland.Urban Studies. 2008;45:943-961.
6. Beaumont J.,Nichols W.Plural governance, participation and democracy in cities.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2008;32:87-94.
7. Berger-Schmitt R.Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: concept and measurement.Social Indicators Research. 2002;58:403-428.
8. Bhérer L.,Quesnel L.La ville: laboratoire des enjeux démocratiques contemporains.Politique et Sociétés. 2006;25:3-11.
9. Boddy M.,Parkinson M.City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance. Boddy M.Parkinson M., ed. Bristol: Policy Press; 2004:407-432.
10. Bodnar J.,Molnar V.Reconfiguring private and public: state, capital and new housing developments in Berlin and Budapest.Urban Studies. 2009;47:789-812.
11. Boyer R.La théorie de la régulation: une analyse critique. Paris: La Découverte; 1986:.
12. Brenner N.,Theodore N.Spaces of Neoliberalism. Brenner N.Theodore N., ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2002:2-32.
13. Buck N.Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion.Urban Studies. 2001;38:2251-2275.
14. Buck N.,Gordon I.City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance. Boddy M.Parkinson M., ed. Bristol: Policy Press; 2004:237-253.
15. Butler T.City Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance. Boddy M.Parkinson M., ed. Bristol: Policy Press; 2004:269-286.
16. Cameron A.Geographies of welfare and exclusion: initial report.Progress in Human Geography. 2005;29:194-203.
17. Castells M.La Question urbaine. Paris: Maspéro; 1972:.
18. Couch C.,Karecha J.,Nuissl H.,Rink D.Decline and sprawl: an evolving type of urban development-observed in Liverpool and Leipzig.European Planning Studies. 2005;13:117-136.
19. Criekingen M. van.Moving in/out of Brussels' historical core in the early 2000s: migration and the effects of gentrification.Urban Studies. 2009;46:825-848.
20. Criekingen M. van,Decroly J. M.Revisiting the diversity of gentrification: neighbourhood renewal processes in Brussels and Montreal.Urban Studies. 2003;40:2451-2468.
21. DeFillipis J.Unmaking Goliath: Community Control in the Face of Global Capital. New York: Routledge; 2004:.
22. DeFillipis J.,Fischer R.,Shragge E.Neither romance nor regulation: re-evaluating community.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2006;30:673-689.
23. DilgerT.FürstH. (2008) Urbaner Wandel und Migration: Renaissance der Städte?, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften, 47(1) (http://www.difu.de/node/5931).
24. Donzelot J.,Jaillet M. C.Deprived urban areas: summary report of the pilot study. Brussels: NATO; 1997:.
25. Dreier P. J.,Mollenkopf J. H.,Swanstrom T.Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-first Century. 2004) Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-first Century, 2nd edn.Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas; 2004:.
26. Ergun N.Gentrification in Istanbul.Cities. 2004;21:391-405.
27. Eraydin A.The impact of globalisation on different social groups: competitiveness, social cohesion and spatial segregation in Istanbul.Urban Studies. 2008;45:1663-1691.
28. Fainstein S.The City Builders: Property Development in New York and London, 1980-2000. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas; 2001.
29. Fainstein S.,Gordon I.,Harloe M.Divided Cities: New York and London in the Contemporary World. Oxford: Blackwell; 1991:.
30. Fernandes E.Constructing the right to the city in Brazil.Social Legal Studies. 2007;16:201-219.
31. Flyvbjerg B.Cities for Citizens. Douglass M.Friedmann J., ed. London: Wiley; 1998:185-212.
32. Forrest R.,Kearns A.Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood.Urban Studies. 2001;38:2125-2143.
33. Friedmann J.,Wolff G.World city formation: an agenda for research and action.International Journal for Urban and Regional Research. 1982;4:309-343.
34. Gerometta J.,Haüssermann H.,Longo G.Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: strategies for an inclusive city.Urban Studies. 2005;42:2007-2021.
35. Gobillon L.,Selod H.,Zenou Y.The mechanisms of spatial mismatch.Urban Studies. 2007;44:2401-2427.
36. Goonewardena K.Urban space and political consciousness: a report on theory.Review of Radical Political Economics. 2004;36:155-176.
37. Hamnett C.Social polarisation in global cities: theory and evidence.Urban Studies. 1994;31:401-424.
38. Hamnett C.Social polarisation, economic restructuring and welfare state regimes.Urban Studies. 1996;33:1407-1430.
39. Hanhörster H.Whose neighbourhood is it? Ethnic diversity in urban spaces in Germany.Geojournal. 2001;51:329-338.
40. Harsman B.Ethnic diversity and spatial segregation in the Stockholm region.Urban Studies. 2006;43:1341-1364.
41. Harvey D.Social Justice and the City. London: Arnold; 1973:.
42. Harvey D.The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell; 1982:.
43. Harvey D.The Urbanisation of Capital. Oxford: Blackwell; 1985:.
44. Harvey D.The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell; 1989:.
45. Häussermann H.The end of the European city?.European Review. 2005;13:237-249.
46. Häussermann H.,Haila A.Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion. Kazepov Y., ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005:43-65.
47. Häussermann H.,Siebel W.Integration und Segregation: Überlegungen zu einer alten Debatte.Deutsch Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften. 2001;40:68-79.
48. Häussermann H.,Läpple D.,Siebel W.Stadtpolitik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; 2008:.
49. Hudson R.Producing Places. New York: Guilford; 2001:.
50. Ipsen D.The socio-spatial conditions of the open city: a theoretical sketch.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2005;29:644-653.
51. Ireland P.Comparing responses to ethnic segregation in urban Europe.Urban Studies. 2008;45:1333-1358.
52. Jansson A.The negotiated city image: symbolic reproduction and change through urban consumption.Urban Studies. 2003;40:463-479.
53. Jessop B.,Brenner N.,Jones M.Theorizing sociospatial relations.Environment and Planning D. 2008;26:389-401.
54. Johnson R. C.Landing a job in urban space: the extent and effects of spatial mismatch.Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2006;36:331-372.
55. Kaelble H.La ville européenne au XXe siècle.Revue économique. 2000;51:385-400.
56. Kain J. F.Housing segregation, negro employment and metropolitan decentralization.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1968;82:175-197.
57. Keil A.New urban governance processes on the level of neighbourhoods.European Planning Studies. 2006;14:335-364.
58. Kempen E. T. van.The dual city and the poor: social polarisation, social segregation and life chances.Urban Studies. 1994;31:995-1015.
59. Kempen R. van,Marcuse P.A new spatial order in cities?.American Behavioral Scientist. 1997;41:285-298.
60. Kempen R. van,Ozuekren A. S.Ethnic segregation in cities: new forms and explanations in a dynamic world.Urban Studies. 1998;35:1631-1656.
61. Kesteloot C.Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion. Kazepov Y., ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005:123-148.
62. Kesteloot C.,Murie A.,Musterd S.Neighbourhoods of Poverty: Urban Social Exclusion and Integration in Comparison. Musterd S.Murie A.Kesteloot C., ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006:219-238.
63. Küblböck K.,Jäger J.,Novy A.Global Trends 2010: Peace-Development-Environment. Debiel T.Messner D.Nuscheler F.Roth M., ed. Bonn: Development for Peace Foundation; 2010:81-99.
64. Laan Bouma-Doff W. van der.Involuntary isolation: ethnic preferences and residential segregation.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2007;29:289-309.
65. Lipietz A.Le Capital et son Espace. Paris: Maspéro; 1977:.
66. Lipietz A.Space and Social Theory. Benko G.Strohmayer U., ed. Cambridge: Blackwell; 1996:250-283.
67. Lupton R.Neighbourhood effects: can we measure them and does it matter?. London School of Economics and Political Science; 2003:.
68. MacCallum D.,Moulaert F.,Hillier J.,Vicari Haddock S.Social Innovation and Territorial Development. London: Ashgate; 2009:.
69. Maloutas T.Segregation, social polarization and immigration in Athens during the 1990s: theoretical expectations and contextual difference.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2007;31:733-758.
70. Marcuse P.'Dual city': a muddy metaphor for a quartered city.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1989;13:697-708.
71. Marcuse P.The enclave, the citadel and the ghetto: what has changed in the post-Fordist U.S. city.Urban Affairs Review. 1997;33:228-264.
72. Marcuse P.Of States and Cities: The Partitioning of Urban Space. Marcuse P.van Kempen R., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002:11-34.
73. Marcuse P.The Global City Reader. Brenner N.Keil R., ed. New York: Routledge; 2006:361-369.
74. Marcuse P.,Kempen R. vanGlobalising Cities: A New Spatial Order?. Oxford: Blackwell; 2000:.
75. Marcuse P.,Kempen R. vanOf States and Cities: The Partitioning of Urban Space. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
76. Massey D.In what sense a regional problem?.Regional Studies. 1979;13:233-243.
77. Massey D.Spatial Divisions of Labour. London: Macmillan; 1985:.
78. Mingione E.Poverty and social exclusion in European cities: diversity and convergence at the local level.Cities. 2004;8:381-389.
79. Mingione E.Family, welfare and districts: the local impact of new migrants in Italy.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2009;16:225-236.
80. Minton A.Ground Control: Fear and Happiness in the Twenty-first Century City. London: Penguin; 2009:.
81. Moulaert F.Globalisation and Integrated Area Development in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:.
82. Moulaert F.,Leontidou L.Localités déintégrées et stratégies de lutte contre la pauvreté: une réflexion méthodologique post-moderne.Espaces et Sociétés. 1995;78:35-53.
83. Moulaert F.,Mehmood A.Analysing regional development and policy: a structural-realist approach.Regional Studies. 2010;44:103-118.
84. Moulaert F.,Scott A. J.Cities, Enterprises and Societies at the Eve of the 21st Century. Moulaert F.Scott A. J., ed. London: Pinter; 1997:3-17.
85. Moulaert F.,Swyngedouw E.,Rodriguez A.Social polarization in metropolitan areas: the role of new urban policy.European Urban and Regional Studies. 2001;8:99-102.
86. Mudu P.Patterns of segregation in contemporary Rome.Urban Geography. 2006;27:422-440.
87. Musterd S.Social and ethnic segregation in Europe: levels, causes and effects.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2005;27:331-348.
88. Musterd S.Segregation, urban spaces and resurgent city.Urban Studies. 2006;43:1325-1340.
89. Musterd S.,Andersson R.Housing mix, social mix and social opportunities.Urban Affairs Review. 2005;40:761-780.
90. Musterd S.,Murie A.,Kesteloot C.Neighbourhoods of Poverty: Urban Social Exclusion and Integration in Comparison. London: Macmillan; 2006:.
91. Novy A.,Coimbra Swiatek D.,Moulaert F.Social cohesion: a conceptual and political elucidation.Urban Studies. 2012;49 (9): 1873-1889.
92. O'Connor P.Mapping social cohesion. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 1998:.
93. Pratschke J.,Morlicchio E.Social polarisation, the labour market and economic restructuring in Europe: an urban perspective.Urban Studies. 2012;49 (9): 1891-1907.
94. Préteceille E.La ségrégation ethno-raciale a-t-elle augmenté dans la métropole parisienne?.Revue française de sociologie. 2009;50:489-519.
95. Rodriguez A.,Swyngedouw E.,Moulaert F.The Globalized City: Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. Moulaert F.Arantxa R.Swyngedouw E., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:28-45.
96. Sassen S.The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1991:.
97. Sassen S.Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press; 1994:.
98. Silver H.National conceptions of the new urban poverty: social structural change in Britain, France and the United States.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1993;4:336-354.
99. Smet P.,Salman T.Countering urban segregation: theoretical and policy innovations from around the globe.Urban Studies. 2008;45:1307-1332.
100. Smith N.Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell; 1984:.
101. Smith N.The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York: Routledge; 1996:.
102. Sonn J. W.Contesting state rescaling: an analysis of the South Korean state's discursive strategy against devolution.Antipode. 2010;42:1200-1224.
103. Souza-Briggs X. deDesegregating the City: Ghettos, Enclaves, and Inequality. Varady D. P., ed. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2005:79-107.
104. Stal G. Y.,Zuberi D. M.Ending the cycle of poverty through socio-economic integration: a comparison of moving to opportunity in the United States and the Bijlmermeer revival project in the Netherlands.Cities. 2010;27:3-12.
105. Storper M.,Scott A. J.The Power of Geography: How Territory Shapes Social Life. Wolch J.Dear M., ed. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman; 1989:21-40.
106. Swyngedouw E.,Moulaert F.,Rodriguez A.The Globalized City: Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. Moulaert F.Arantxa R.Swyngedouw E., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:9-28.
107. Terhorst P. J. F.,Ven J. C. L.,van deThe Territorial Factor: Amsterdam: Political Geography in a Globalising World. Dijkink G. J.Knippenberg H., ed. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2001:399-428.
108. Theurillat T.La ville négociée: entre financiarisation et durabilité. Neuchâtel: Groupe de recherche en Economie territoriale; 2009:.
109. Torrance M. I.Forging glocal governance? Urban infrastructures as networked financial products.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2008;32:1-21.
110. Turok I.,Bailey N.,Atkinson R.,Bramley G., et alCity Matters: Competitiveness, Cohesion and Urban Governance. Boddy M.Parkinson M., ed. Bristol: Policy Press; 2004:13-32.
111. Wacquant L.L'exclusion, état des savoirs. Paugham S., ed. Paris: La Découverte; 1996:248-262.
112. Wessel T.Social polarisation and socioeconomic segregation in a welfare state: the case of Oslo.Urban Studies. 2000;37:1947-1967.
113. Wilson W. J.The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987:.