Heterarchy and hierarchy among the ancient Mongolian nomads

Social Evolution and History

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Kradin, Nikolay N ^a  

^a FAR EASTERN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862313185     PISSN: 16814363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Adams, R. N. 1975. Energy and Structure. A Theory of Social Power. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Barfield, Th. 1989. The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, 221 BC to AD 1757. Cambridge, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Beck, R. A., Jr. 2003. Consolidation and Hierarchy: Chiefdom Variability in the Mississippian Southeast. American Antiquity 68(4): 641-661.
4. Berent, M. 2000. The Stateless Polis: The Early State and the Ancient Greek Community. In Kradin, N. N., Korotayev, A. V., Bondarenko, D. M., de Munck, V., and Wason, P. K. (eds.), Alternatives of Social Evolution (pp. 225-241). Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
5. Berezkin, Yu. E. 1995. Alternative Models of the Middle Range Society. 'Individualistic' Asia vs. 'Collectivistic' America? In Kradin, N. N., and Lynsha, V. A. (eds.), Alternative Pathways to Early State (pp. 75-92). Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.
6. Berezkin, Yu. E. 2000. Once Again on Horizontal and Vertical Links in Structure of the Middle Range Societies. In Kradin, N. N., Korotayev, A. V., Bondarenko, D. M., de Munck, V., and Wason, P. K. (eds.), Alternatives of Social Evolution (pp. 220-224). Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
7. Bichurin, N. Ya. 1950 [1851]. Collected Data about the Peoples Inhabiting Middle Asia in Ancient Times. Vol. 1. Moscow - Leningrad: Academy of Science of the USSR Press.
8. Blanton, R., Feinman, G., Kowalewski, S., and Peregrine, P. 1996. A Dual-processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37(1): 1-14, 73-86.
9. Bondarenko, D. M. 2006. Homoarchy: A Principle of Culture's Organization. The 13th - 19th Centuries Benin Kingdom as a Non-state Supercomplex Society. Moscow: KomKniga.
10. Bondarenko, D. M. 2007. Homoarchy as a Principle of Sociopolitical Organization. Anthropos 102: 187-199.
11. Bondarenko, D. M., and Korotayev, A. V. (eds.), 2000. Civilizational Models of Politogenesis. Moscow: Center for Civilizational and Regional Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
12. Carneiro, R. 1981. The Chiefdom as Precursor of the State. In Jones, G., and Kautz, R. (eds.), The Transition to Statehood in the New World (pp. 37-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Carneiro, R. 2000. Process vs. Stages: A False Dichotomy in Tracing the Rise of the State. In Kradin, N. N., Korotayev, A. V., Bondarenko, D. M., de Munck, V., and Wason, P. K. (eds.), Alternatives of Social Evolution (pp. 52-58). Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
14. Carneiro, R. 2002. Was the Chiefdom a Congelation of Ideas? Social Evolution & History 1(1): 80-100.
15. Collins, R. 1978. Long-term social change and the territorial power of states. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change 1: 1-34.
16. Creamer, W., and Haas, J. 1985. Tribe versus Chiefdom in Lower Central America. American Antiquity 50: 738-754.
17. Cribb, R. 1991. Nomads in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Crumley, C. L. 1995. Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies. In Ehrenreich, R. M., Crumley, C. L., and Levy, J. E. (eds.), Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies (pp. 1-5). Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association.
19. Crumley, C. L. 2001. Communication, Holism, and the Evolution of Sociopolitical Complexity. In Haas, J. (ed.), From leaders to rulers (pp. 19-36). New York: Kluwer Academics.
20. Drennan, R. D., and Uribe, C. (eds.). 1987. Chiefdoms in the Americas. Landham, Md: University Press of America.
21. Earle, T. 1987. Chiefdoms in archaeological and ethnohistorical perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 279-308.
22. Earle, T. 1991 (ed.). Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
23. Earle, T. 1997. How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Earle, T. 2002. Bronze Age Economics: The Beginnings of Political Economies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Feinman, G. 2001. Mesoamerican Political Complexity: The Corporate-Network Dimension. In Haas, J. (ed.), From leaders to rulers (pp. 151-175). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
27. Fried, M. 1975. The Notion of Tribe. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings Publishing Company.
28. Gan Chigeng, and Sun Suzen. 1982. Questions on the early Xianbei history and archaeological sites. Minzu yanjiu 1: 15-22. In Chinese (Guanyu Xianbei zaoqi lishi ji qi kaogu yicun de jige wenti).
29. Grinin, L. E. 2007. State and Historical Process. Vols 1-3. Moscow: URSS.
30. Grinin, L. E. 2009. The Pathways of Politogenesis and Models of the Early State Formation. Social Evolution & History 8(1): 92-132.
31. Guhr, G. 1985. Militarische Demokratie. Jahrbuch des Museums für Völkerkunde zu Leipzig 36: 21-47.
32. Hanks, B., and Linduff, K. (eds.). 2009. Social Complexity in Prehistoric Eurasia: Monuments, Metals, and Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Herrman, J. 1982. Militarische Demokratie und die Ubergangsperiode zur Klassengesellschat. Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift 23(1): 11-31.
34. Fan Ye H.H.S. Hou Han shu [History of the Later Han Dynasty]. Beijing: Bona Press, 1958.
35. Houle, J.-L. 2010. Emergent Complexity on the Mongolian Steppe: Mobility, Territoriality, and the Development of Early Nomadic Polities. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
36. Klejn, L. S. 1993. To separate a centaur: On the relationship of archaeology and history in Soviet tradition. Antiquity 67: 339-348.
37. König, W. 1981. Zur Fragen der Gesellschaftsorganisation der Nomaden. Die Nomaden in Geschichte und Gegenwart (Veröffentlichungen des Museums für Völkerkunde zu Leipzig) 33: 25-30.
38. Korotayev, A. V. 1995. Mountains and Democracy. In Kradin, N. N., and Lynsha, V. A. (eds.), Alternative Pathways to Early State (pp. 60-74). Vladivostok: Dal'nauka.
39. Koryakova, L. N. 1996. Social Trend in Temperate Eurasia during the Second and First Millennia BC. Journal of European Archaeology 4: 243-280.
40. Kovalevsky, O. M. 1986. On the term 'military democracy'. SrednieVeka46: 198-213.
41. Kovychev, E. V. 2009. The Xianbei in the South-East Trans-Baikal area. In Konstantonov, M. V. et al. (eds.), Ancient East Baikal region: culture and nature (pp. 113-126). Chita: East Baikal State Pedagogical University.
42. Kowalewski, S. 2000. Cyclical Transformations in North American Prehistory. In Kradin, N. N., Korotayev, A. V., Bondarenko, D. M., de Munck, V., and Wason, P. K. (eds.), Alternatives of Social Evolution (pp. 177-187). Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
43. Kradin, N. N. 1994. Social structure of Xianbei empire. In Shavkunov, E. V. (ed.), Mediaeval Studies in Russian Far East (pp. 22-36). Vladivostok: Dalnauka.
44. Kradin, N. N. 1995. Chiefdoms: contemporary studies and problems. In Popov, V. A. (ed.), Early Forms of Political Organizations (pp. 11-61). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura.
45. Kradin, N. N. 2000. Nomadic Empires in Evolutionary Perspective. In Kradin, N. N., Korotayev, A. V., Bondarenko, D. M., de Munck, V., and Wason, P. K. (eds.), Alternatives of Social Evolution (pp. 274-288). Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
46. Kradin, N. N. 2002. Nomadism, Evolution, and World-Systems: Pastoral Societies in Theories of Historical Development. Journal of World-System Research VIII(3): 368-388.
47. Kradin, N. N., and Ivliev, A. L. 2008. Deported Nation: the fate of Bohai peoples of Mongolia. Antiquity 82: 438-445.
48. Kradin, N. N., and Ivliev, A. L. 2009. The Downfall of the Bohai state and the ethnic structure of the Kitan city of Chintolgoi balgas, Mongolia. In Bemmann, J., Parzinger, H., Pohl, E., and Tseveendorzh, D. (eds.), Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia. Papers from the First International Conference on 'Archaeological Research in Mongolia'. Ulaanbaatar, August 19-23, 2007 (pp. 461-475). Bonn: Bonn University Press.
49. Kradin, N. N., and Skrynnikova, T. D. 2006. The Genghis Khan Empire. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura RAN.
50. Kradin, N. N., and Skrynnikova, T. D. 2009. 'Stateless Head': Notes on Revisionism in the Studies of Nomadic Societies. Ab Imperio 4: 117-128.
51. Kristiansen, K. 2007. The Rules of the Game. Decentralized Complexity and Power Structures. In Kohring, K., and Wynne-Jones, S. (eds.), Socializing Complexity:Approaches to Power and Interaction in Archaeological Discourse (pp. 60-75). Oxford: Oxford books.
52. Lidai. 1961. Collected data about the peoples of the different historical periods. Vol. 1. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. In Chinese (Zhongyang minzu xueyuan yanjiubu, Lidai gezu juanji huibian).
53. Lin Gan. 1989. History of the Dunkhu peoples.Hohhot: Nei Mengu zhenmin. In Chinese (Dunkhu shi).
54. Liu Xueyao. 1994. The Xianbei History. Taibei: Nantian Press. In Chinese (Xianbei shi lun).
55. Ma Changshou. 1962. The Wuhuan and the Xianbei. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Press. In Chinese (Wuhuan yu Xianbei).
56. Markov, G. E. 1976. The Nomads of Asia. Moscow: Moscow State University Press.
57. Markov, G. E. 1978. Problems of Social Change among the Asiatic Nomads. In Weissleder, W. (ed.), The Nomadic Alternative (pp. 305-311). The Hague: Mouton.
58. Marcus, J., and Feinman, G. M. (eds.). 1998. Archaic States. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
59. McIntosh, S. K. (ed.). 1999. Beyond Chiefdoms: Pathways to Complexity in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Mi Wenpin. 1994. Study of Xianbei history. Shenyang: Zhongzhou guji chubanshe. In Chinese (Xianbei shi yanjiu).
61. Mi Wenpin. 2000. Study of Xianbei History. Shanghai: Shanghai zhenmin. In Chinese (Xianbei shi yanzu).
62. Mullie, J. L. M. 1969. Les Sien-pi. Central Asiatic Journal 13(1): 24-51.
63. Pauketat, T. 2007. Chiefdoms and other Archaeological Delusions. New York - Walnut Canyon - California: AltaMira Press.
64. Redmond, E. (ed.). 1998. Chiefdoms and chieftaincy in the Americas. Gainesvill, FL: University Press of Florida.
65. Renfrew, C. 1974. Beyond a subsistence economy, the evolution of social organization in prehistoric Europe. In Moore, C. B. (ed.), Reconstructing Complex Societies (pp. 69-95). Ann Arbor: Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, No 20.
66. Sahlins, M. 1968. Tribesmen. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
67. Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone Age Economy. Chicago, IL: Adline Publishing.
68. Schreiber, G. 1947. Das Volk der Xianbei zur Han-Zeit. Monumenta Serica 12: 145-203.
69. Service, E. 1962. Primitive Social Organization. New York: Random House.
70. Service, E. 1971. Primitive Social Organization. 2nd ed. New York: Random House.
71. Service, E. 1975. Origins of the State and Civilization. New York: W. W. Norton and Co. Inc.
72. Skalník, P. 2004. Chiefdom: A Universal Political Formation? Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology 43: 76-98.
73. Shiratori, K. 1935. Question about the Donghu peoples. Shanghai. In Japanese (Toko minzoku kō).
74. Sneath, D. 2007. The Headless State: Aristocratic Orders, Kinship Society, and Misrepresentations of Nomadic Inner Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.
75. SZ: Chen Shou. Sangokuzhi. [Records of Three Kingdoms]. Beijing: Bona Press, 1958.
76. Su Bai. 1977. The Xianbei Sites in the territory of northeastern China and Inner Mongolia. Ch. 1. Wenwu 5: 42-54. In Chinese (Dongbei, Nei Menggu diqu de Xianbei yiji jilu zhi yi. Wenwu 5: 42-54).
77. Taskin, V. S. 1984: Materials on the history of the ancient nomadic people Donghu. Moscow: Nauka.
78. Treide, D., and Treide, B. 1984. Das Konzept der militarischen Demokratie und einigen Fragen der ethnpgraphischen Forschung. Ethnographische-Archaologische Zeitschrift 25(3): 380-407.
79. Tsybiktarov, A. D. 1998. Culture of Slab Burials of Mongolia and the Trans-Baikal Area. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University Press.
80. Turchin, P., and Gavrilets, S. 2009. Evolution of Complex Hierarchical Societies. Social Evolution & History 8(2): 167-198.
81. Wason, P. K., and Baldia, M. O. 2000. Religion, Communication, and the Genesis of Social Complexity in the European Neolithic. In Kradin, N. N., Korotayev, A. V., Bondarenko, D. M., de Munck, V., and Wason, P. K. (eds.), Alternatives of Social Evolution (pp. 138-148). Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
82. Webster, D. 2005. States of mind. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 15(2): 260-264.
83. Yaremchuk, O. A. 2005. The Cemetery Zorgol-1 - site of the Xiongnu - Xianbei periods in the Daurya steppe. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Novosibirsk: Institute of archaeology and ethnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
84. Yoffee, N. 1993. Too Many Chiefs? (Or, Safe Texts for the '90s). In Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds.), ArchaeologicalTheory: Who Sets the Agenda? (pp. 60-78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Yoffee, N. 2005. Myth of the Archaic State: Evolution of the Earliest Cities, States, and Civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Yu Suhua. 2002. urgent questions of the study of the early Xianbei history. InSalkin, S. V. (ed.), History and Culture of East Asia. Papers of International Conference. Vol. 2 (pp. 197-200). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University Press.
87. Yu Suhua. 2006. Study of the Xianbei archaeological sites in Chinese historiography. Vestnik Novosibirskogo Universiteta 5(3): 13-23.