The Professional Responsibility Model of Respect for Autonomy in Decision Making About Cesarean Delivery

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1-2

  Chervenak, Frank A ^a   McCullough, Laurence B ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDITORIAL; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR; MALPRACTICE; MORALITY; MOTHER; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT RIGHT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS;

CESAREAN SECTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DEFENSIVE MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; MOTHERS; OBSTETRICS; PATIENT RIGHTS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84862309195     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2012.682639     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Burrow, S. 2012. On the cutting edge: Ethical responsiveness to cesarean rates. American Journal of Bioethics, 12(7): 44-52.
2. Chervenak, F. A., McCullough, L. B. and Brent, R. L. 2011. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics-Avoiding the perils of clashing rights. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 205(4): 315.1-315.5.
3. Emanuel, E. J. and Emanuel, L. L. 1992. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(16): 2221-2226.
4. McCullough, L. B. and Chervenak, F. A. 1994. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.