Healthy aging 2.0: The potential of new media and technology

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Hall, Amanda K ^a   Stellefson, Michael ^a   Bernhardt, Jay M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MOBILE PHONE; PUBLIC HEALTH; TELEMEDICINE;

AGED; AGING; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; CELLULAR PHONE; CHRONIC DISEASE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; PUBLIC HEALTH; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84862308159     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5888/pcd9.110241     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Anderson G, Horvath J, Herbert R, Ridgeway K, Pavlovich W, Harjai G, et al. Chronic conditions: making the case for ongoing care. Partnership for Solutions, Johns Hopkins University, for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2002. http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/chronicbook2002.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2011.
2. Dasgupta A, Deb S. Telemedicine: a new horizon in public health in India. Indian J Community Med 2008;33 (1):3-8.
3. Special issue on healthcare: healthy ageing and the future of public healthcare systems. European Commission; 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/efmn-special-issue-on-healthcare_en.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2011.
4. Clark RA, Inglis SC, McAlister FA, Cleland JG, Stewart S. Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007;334 (7600):942.
5. Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, Foster L, Edmonson E, Wakefield B, Lancaster AE. Care Coordination/Home telehealth: the systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed J E Health 2008;14(10):1118-26.
6. Fox S. E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2007. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Epatients-With-a-Disability-or-Chronic-Disease.aspx. Accessed November 22, 2011.
7. Fox S. Cancer 2.0: a summary of recent research. Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2010. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Cancer_20_Dec2010.pdf. Accessed November 22, 2011.
8. Internet usage and online activities of older adults. US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging; 2009. http://www.aoa.gov/aoaroot/press_room/social_media/widget/statistical_profile/2010/6.aspx. Accessed November 22, 2011.
9. Hughes B, Joshi I, Wareham J. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(3):e23.
10. Madden M. Older adults and social media. Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2010. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Older-Adults-and-Social-Media.aspx. Accessed November 22, 2011.
11. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 2006;21(2):333-52.
12. Morrell RW, Mayhorn CB, Bennett J. A survey of World Wide Web use in middle-aged and older adults. Hum Factors 2000;42(2):175-82.