Data model considerations for clinical effectiveness researchers

Medical Care

Volumn 50, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Kahn, Michael G ^a,b,c   Batson, Deborah ^c   Schilling, Lisa M ^d  

^a Division of Pediatric Epidemiology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c CHILDREN S HOSPITAL COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative Effectiveness Research; Data models; Databases

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTHMA; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIST;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DATA MINING; HUMANS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84862300087     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: 15371948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259bff4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:382-385.
2. Waldren S, Kibbe DC, Mitchell J. "Will the feds really buy me an EHR?" and other commonly asked questions about the HITECH Act. Fam Pract Manag. 2009;16:19-23.
3. McLeod A. Health IT for economic and clinical health: HITECH Medicare incentive payment estimator. Healthc Financ Manage. 2009;63:110-111.
4. Friedman CP, Wong AK, Blumenthal D. Achieving a nationwide learning health system. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:57cm29-31.
5. Grossmann C, Institute of Medicine (US). Roundtable on Value & Science-Driven Health Care. Clinical Data as the Basic Staple of Health Learning: Creating and Protecting A Public Good: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010.
6. Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. Expansion of the DEcIDE distributed research network (DRN) infrastructure to support studies of comparative effectiveness-Phase II. Effective Health Care Program 2010. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index. cfm/search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?pageaction = displayproduct &productid = 485. Accessed August 30, 2011.
7. Bekke JHt. Semantic Data Modeling. New York: Prentice Hall; 1992.
8. Simsion GC. Data Modeling: Theory and Practice. Bradley Beach, NJ: Technics Publications; 2007.
9. Hoberman S. Data Modeling Made Simple: A Practical Guide for Business and IT Professionals. 2nd ed. Bradley Beach, NJ: Technics Publications; 2009.
10. Borkin SA. Data Models: A Semantic Approach for Database Systems. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1980.
11. Chmura A, Heumann JM. Logical Data Modeling: What it is and How to do it. New York, NY: Springer; 2005.
12. Tsichritzis DC, Lochovsky FH. Data Models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1982.
13. Silverston L. The Data Model Resource Book. Revised ed. New York: John Wiley; 2001.
14. Riben M, Wade G, Edgerton M, et al. Aligning tissue banking data models for caBIG interoperability. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008;1109.
15. Brown JS, Lane K, Moore K, et al. Defining and Evaluating Possible Database Models to Implement the FDA Sentinel Initiative. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2009. Available at: http://www.regulations.gov/contentStreamer? objectId=0900006480e6cd93&disposition=attachment &contentType=pdf. Accessed May 1, 2012.
16. Marrs KA, Kahn MG. Extending a clinical repository to include multiple sites. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995;387-391.
17. Marrs KA, Steib SA, Abrams CA, et al. Unifying heterogeneous distributed clinical data in a relational database. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993;644-648.
18. Krohn R. Advice on HIE for the ARRA-minded. A big boost for digital transformation. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2009;23:7-8.
19. Halamka JD. Making the most of federal health information technology regulations. Health Aff. (Millwood). 2010;29:596-600.
20. von Halle B. Data: asset or liability? Database Program Des. 1991;4:7-9.
21. Batini C, Ceri S, Navathe S. Conceptual database design: an entityrelationship approach. Redwood City, CA. Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co; 1992.
22. Levitin A, Redman T. Quality dimensions of a conceptual view. Inform Process Manag. 1995;31:81-88.
23. Krogstie J, Lindland O, Sindre G, et al. Towards a deeper understanding of quality in requirements engineering. Adv Inf Syst Eng. 1995;932: 82-95. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
24. Lindland OI, Sindre G, Solvberg A. Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software. 1994;11:42-49.
25. Kesh S. Evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. Infor Software Technol. 1995;37:681-689.
26. Simsion GC, Witt GC. Data Modeling Essentials. 3rd ed. Amsterdam; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2005.
27. Moody DL, Shanks GG. What makes a good data model? Evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. Proceedings of the13th International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach; 1994.
28. Moody DL, Shanks GG. Improving the quality of data models: Empirical validation of a quality management framework. Inf Syst. 2003;28:619-650.
29. Moody DL. Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl Eng. 2005;55:243-276. (Pubitemid 41398084)