Factorized orthogonal latent spaces

Journal of Machine Learning Research

Volumn 9, Issue , 2010, Pages 701-708

  Salzmann, Mathieu ^a   Ek, Carl Henrik ^a   Urtasun, Raquel ^b   Darrell, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA STREAM; LATENT SPACE MODELS; LOW DIMENSIONAL; MONOCULAR IMAGE; MULTI-KERNEL; MULTI-VIEW LEARNING; ORTHOGONALITY CONSTRAINTS; PARAMETERS SETTING; POSE ESTIMATION; PRIVATE SPACES; REGULARIZER; ROBUST APPROACHES;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84862294408     PISSN: 15324435     EISSN: 15337928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. C. Archambeau, and F. Bach. Sparse Probabilistic Projections. NIPS, 2008.
2. F. Bach, G. Lanckriet, and M. Jordan. Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm. In ICML, 2004.
3. J. F. Cai, E. Candes, and Z. Shen. A Singular Value Thresholding Algorithm for Matrix Completion. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0810.3286, 2008.
4. C. H. Ek, P. H. Torr, and N. D. Lawrence. Gaussian process latent variable models for human pose estimation. In MLMI, 2007.
5. C. H. Ek, P. H. Torr, and N. D. Lawrence. Ambiguity modeling in latent spaces. In MLMI, 2008.
6. A. Geiger, R. Urtasun, and T. Darrell. Rank priors for continuous non-linear dimensionality reduction. In CVPR, 2009.
7. A. Kanaujia, C. Sminchisescu, and D. Metaxas. Semisupervised Hierarchical Models for 3D Human Pose Reconstruction. In CVPR, 2007.
8. A. Klami, and S. Kaski. Probabilistic approach to detecting dependencies between data sets. In Neurocomputing, 72:39-46, 2008.
9. M. Kuss and T. Graepel. The geometry of kernel canonical correlation analysis. Technical Report TR-108, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany, 2003.
10. N. D. Lawrence. Probabilistic non-linear principal component analysis with Gaussian process latent variable models. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6:1783- 1816, 11 2005.
11. N. D. Lawrence. Learning for larger datasets with the Gaussian process latent variable model. AISTATS, 2007.
12. G. Leen. Context assisted information extraction. PhD thesis, University of the West of Scotland, High Street, Paisley PA1 2BE, Scotland, 2008.
13. R. Memisevic. Kernel information embeddings. In ICML, 2006.
14. R. Navaratnam, A. Fitzgibbon, and R. Cipolla. The joint manifold model. In ICCV, 2007.
15. A. Shon, K. Grochow, A. Hertzmann, and R. Rao. Learning shared latent structure for image synthesis and robotic imitation. NIPS, 2006.
16. L. Sigal and M. Black. Humaneva: Synchronized video and motion capture dataset for evaluation of articulated human motion. Brown Univertsity TR, 2006.
17. L. Sigal, R. Memisevic, and D. J. Fleet. Shared kernel information embedding for discriminative inference. In CVPR, 2009.
18. S. Sonnenburg, G. Rätsch, C. Schäfer, and B. Schölkopf. Large scale multiple kernel learning. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1531-1565, 2006.
19. R. Urtasun and T. Darrell. Discriminative gaussian process latent variable model for classification. ICML, 2007.
20. R. Urtasun, D. Fleet, A. Geiger, J. Popović, T. Darrell, and N. Lawrence. Topologically-constrained latent variable models. In ICML, 2008.