Research data collection methods: From paper to tablet computers

Medical Care

Volumn 50, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Wilcox, Adam B ^a   Gallagher, Kathleen D ^a   Boden Albala, Bernadette ^b   Bakken, Suzanne R ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical research; IPad; Primary data collection; Tablet computers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TELECONSULTATION; WORKFLOW;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COMPUTERS; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PAPER;

EID: 84862281001     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: 15371948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c1e7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, et al. A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:23. 10 pages.
2. Cole E, Pisano ED, Clary GJ, et al. A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(10-11):722-729. (Pubitemid 44499149)
3. Curioso WH, Mechael PN. Enhancing 'M-health' with south-to-south collaborations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:264-267.
4. Haller G, Haller DM, Courvoisier DS, et al. Handheld vs. laptop computers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a crossover randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:651-659.
5. Pundt H. Field data collection with mobile GIS: dependencies between semantics and data quality. Geoinformatica. 2002;6:363-380. (Pubitemid 36036390)
6. Shapiro JS, Bessette MJ, Baumlin KM, et al. Automating research data collection. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1223-1228. (Pubitemid 39446344)
7. Shelby-James TM, Abernethy AP, McAlindon A, et al. Handheld computers for data entry: high tech has its problems too. Trials. 2007;8:5. 2 pages.
8. Libby AM, Pace W, Bryan C, et al. Comparative effectiveness research in DARTNet primary care practices: point of care data collection on hypoglycemia and over-the-counter and herbal use among patients diagnosed with diabetes. Med Care. 2010;48(suppl):S39-S44.
9. Abernethy AP, Ahmad A, Zafar SY, et al. Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Med Care. 2010;48(suppl):S32-S38.
10. Bernstam EV, Hersh WR, Johnson SB, et al. Synergies and distinctions between computational disciplines in biomedical research: perspective from the Clinical andTranslational Science Award programs. Acad Med. 2009;84:964-970.
11. MacNews. Nielsen: iPad has 82% of the tablet market. 2011. Available at: http://www.macnews.com/2011/05/05/nielsen-ipad-has-82-tabletmarket. Accessed August 31, 2011.
12. DiscountCoder.com. A brief history of the iPad. 2011. Available at: http://www.discountcoder.com/images/infographics/iPad-infographic.jpg. Accessed August 31, 2011.
13. Brown B. Gartner: nearly 20 million tablets to be sold in 2010. 2010. Available at: http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/101510-gartnertablets-ipad. html. Accessed August 31, 2011.
14. Elmer-DeWitt P. How many tablets in 2011? 2010. Available at: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/11/27/how-many-tablets-in-2011/. Accessed September 2, 2011.
15. Keizer G. iPad lead shrinks as tablet sales grow. 2011. Available at: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9207319/iPad-lead-shrinks-as-tablet- sales-grow. Accessed September 2, 2011.
16. Long M. Tablet mania: 50 million to ship in 2011. 2011. Available at: http://www.tabletsmania.com/technology-news/tablet-mania-50-millionto-ship-in- 2011/. Accessed September 2, 2011.
17. Choi JS, Yi B, Park JH, et al. The uses of the smartphone for doctors: an empirical study from samsung medical center. Healthc Inform Res. 2011;17:131-138.
18. Kiser K. 25 ways to use your smartphone. Physicians share their favorite uses and apps. Minn Med. 2011;94:22-29.
19. Berger E. The iPad: gadget or medical godsend? Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56:A21-A22.
20. Mashman W. The iPad in cardiology: tool or toy? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:258-259.
21. Putzer GJ, Park Y. The effects of innovation factors on smartphone adoption among nurses in community hospitals. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2010;7:1b. 20 pages.
22. Kushida CA. Comparative Outcomes Management with Electronic Data Technology (COMET) Study. 2010. Available at: http://gold.ahrq.gov/ projectsearch/grant-summary.jsp?grant = R01+HS19738-01. Accessed June 8, 2011.
23. Overhage JM. Indiana PROSPECT. 2010. Available at: http://gold. ahrq.gov/projectsearch/grant-summary.jsp?grant = R01+HS19818-01. Accessed June 8, 2011.
24. Hutton JJ. Building modular pediatric chronic disease registries for QI and CE research. 2010. Available at: http://gold.ahrq.gov/projectsearch/grant- summary.jsp?grant = R01+HS20024-01. Accessed June 8, 2011.
25. Schilling LM. Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet). 2010. Available at: http://gold.ahrq. gov/projectsearch/ grant-summary.jsp?grant =R01+HS19908-01. Accessed June 8, 2011.
26. Wilcox AB. Washington heights initiative community-based comparative effectiveness research. 2010. Available at: http://gold.ahrq.gov/projectsearch/ grant-summary.jsp?grant = R01+HS19853-01. Accessed June 8, 2011.
27. Food and Drug Administration (2010). Guidance for Industry: Electronic Source Documentation in Clinical Investigations-Draft Guidance. Food and Drug Administration US Department of Health and Human Services.