Evaluating and developing theories in the information systems discipline

Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-30

  Weber, Ron ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Associations; Boundary conditions; Constructs; Events; Falsifiability; Meso level theory; Parsimony; States; Theoretical importance; Theoretical novelty; Theory building; Theory evaluation; Theory refinement

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

CONSTRUCTS; EVENTS; FALSIFIABILITY; MESOLEVEL; PARSIMONY; STATES; THEORETICAL IMPORTANCE; THEORETICAL NOVELTY; THEORY BUILDING; THEORY EVALUATION; THEORY REFINEMENT;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84862276983     PISSN: 15583457     EISSN: 15369323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00284     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbott, A. (1990). A primer on sequence methods. Organization Science, 1(4), 375-392.
2. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515.
3. Blalock, H. M. (1971). Causal models in the social sciences. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.
4. Boudon, R. (1991). Review: What middle-range theories are. Contemporary Sociology, 20(4), 519-522.
5. Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on basic philosophy: Volume 3: Ontology I: The furniture of the world. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
6. Bunge, M. (1979). Treatise on basic philosophy: Volume 4: Ontology II: A world of systems. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
7. Cadiz, D., Sawyer, J. E., and Griffith, T. L. (2009). Developing and validating field measurement scales for absorptive capacity and experienced community of practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(6), 1035-1058.
8. Colquitt, J. A., and Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A fivedecade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281-1303.
9. Corley, K. G., and Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12-32.
10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
11. Davis, G. F. (2010). Do theories of organizations progress? Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 690-709.
12. DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
13. Doty, D. H., and Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230-251.
14. Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building (Rev. ed). London: Free Press.
15. Edwards, J. R., and Berry, J. W. (2010). The presence of something or the absence of nothing: Increasing theoretical precision in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 668-689.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Journal, 14(4), 532-550.
17. Fetzer, J. H. (1993). Philosophy of Science. New York: Paragon House.
18. Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
19. Freese, L. (1980). Formal theorizing. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 187-212.
20. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2003). Theory and reality: An introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Gray, P. H., and Cooper, W. H. (2010). Pursuing failure. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 620-643.
22. Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611-642.
23. Griffith, T. L., and Sawyer, J. E. (2010). Multilevel knowledge and team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 1003-1031.
24. Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., and Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 265-287.
25. Grover, V., Lyytinen, K., Srinivasan, A., and Tan, B. C. Y. (2008). Contributing to rigorous and forward thinking explanatory theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(2), 40-47.
26. Hambrick, D. C. (2007). The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1346-1352.
27. Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
28. Hovorka, D. S., and Lee, A. S. (2010). Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation: Consequences for information systems research. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Information Systems, St. Louis, MO.
29. Jaccard, J., and Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30. Klein, H. K., and Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67-93.
31. rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Lamb, R., and Kling, R. (2003). Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 197-235.
33. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
34. Leavitt, K., Mitchell, T. R., and Peterson, J. (2010). Theory pruning: Strategies to reduce our dense theoretical landscape. Organizational Research Methods, 13(4), 644-667.
35. Lewin, K. (1945). The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry, 8(2), 126-136.
36. Locke, K., and Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and 'problematizing' in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023-1062.
37. Lowry, P. B., Zhang, D., Zhou, L, and Fu, X. (2010). Effects of culture, social presence, and group composition on trust in technology-supported decision-making groups. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 297-315.
38. Markus, M. L., and Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598.
39. Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory-testing in psychology and physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of Science, 34(2), 103-115.
40. Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure (Rev. ed.). Glencoe, IL.: Free Press.
41. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
42. Mone, M. A., and McKinley, W. (1993). The uniqueness value and its consequences for organization studies. Journal of Management Enquiry, 2(3), 284-296.
43. Monge, P. R. (1990). Theoretical and analytical issues in studying organizational processes. Organization Science, 1(4), 406-430.
44. Parsons, T. (1950). The prospects of sociological theory. American Sociological Review, 15(1), 3-16.
45. Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711-724.
46. Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H., Dooley, K., and Holmes, M. E. (2000). Process theories and narrative explanation. In M. S. Poole, A. H. Van de Ven, K. Dooley, and M. E. Holmes (Eds.), Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research (pp. 29-55). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
47. Popper, K. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Taylor and Francis e-Library.
48. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A, and Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263.
49. Shapira, Z. (2011). "I've got a theory paper-do you?": Conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organization Science, 22(5), 1312-1321.
50. Sutton, R. I. and Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371-384.
51. Van de Ven, A. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486-489.
52. Weber, R. (2003a). The problem of the problem. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), iii-ix.
53. Weber, R. (2003b). Theoretically speaking. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), iii-xi.
54. Webster, J., and Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.
55. Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516-531.
56. Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385-390.
57. Weick, K. E. (1999). Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 797-806.
58. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495.
59. Zmud, R. (1998). Editor's comments. MIS Quarterly, 22(2), xxix-xxxi.
60. Zmud, R. (2003). Special issue on redefining the organizational roles of information technology in the information age. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 195.