Intentional context in situated natural language learning

CoNLL 2005 - Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 104-111

  Fleischman, Michael ^a   Roy, Deb ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS;

ACQUISITION MODELS; EMBEDDED DOMAINS; INTERACTIVE GAMES; LANGUAGE ACQUISITION; NATURAL LANGUAGE INTERFACES; NATURAL LANGUAGE LEARNING; NOISY CHANNEL; PROBABILISTIC CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84862272102     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1706543.1706562     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. thCognitive Science Society Meeting. Mahwah, NJ, 1997.
2. P. F. Brown, V. J. Della Pietra, S. A. Della Pietra & R. L. Mercer. "The Mathematics of Sta-tistical Machine Translation: Parameter Estimation, " Computational Linguistics 19(2). 1993.
3. M Epstein Statistical Source Channel Models for Natural Language Understanding Ph. D. thesis, New York University, September, 1996
4. C. Fellbaum WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database and Some of its Applications. MIT Press, 1998.
5. M. Fleischman and D.K. Roy. Why Verbs are Harder to Learn than Nouns: Initial Insights from a Computational Model of Intention Recognition in Situated Word Learning. CogSci. Italy, 2005.
6. L. Gleitman. "The structural sources of verb meanings. " Language Acquisition, 1(1), 1990.
7. D. Klein and C. Manning, "Corpus-Based Induction of Syntactic Structure: Models of Dependency and Constituency", Proc. of the 42nd ACL, 2004 [
8. D. B Lenat,. CYC: A Large-Scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure. Comm. of ACM, 1995.
9. C. Manning, H. Schutze,. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, 2001.
10. G. A. Miller, E. Galanter, and K. Pribram 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Halt.
11. S. Narayanan. Moving right along: A computational model of metaphoric reasoning about events. In Proc. of AAAI. Orlando, FL, 1999.
12. M. Nicolescu, M. Mataric, Natural Methods for Robot Task Learning: Instructive Demonstration, Generalization and Practice, AGENTS, Australia, 2003.
13. D. Pynadath, 1999. Probabilistic Grammars for Plan Recognition. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan. T. Regier. The human semantic potential. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
14. T. Regier. Emergent constraints on word-learning: A computational review. TICS, 7, 263-268, 2003.
15. J. Rickel, S. Marsella, J. Gratch, R. Hill, D. Traum and W. Swartout, "Towards a New Generation of Virtual Humans for Interactive Experiences, " in IEEE Intelligent Systems July/August 2002.
16. D. Roy, K. Hsiao, and N. Mavridis. Mental imagery for a conversational robot. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 34(3) 2004.
17. D. Roy. (in press). Grounding Language in the World: Schema Theory Meets Semiotics. AI.
18. J. Siskind. Grounding the Lexical Semantics of Verbs in Visual Perception using Force Dynamics and Event Logic. JAIR, 2001.
19. A. Stolcke. Bayesian Learning of Probabilistic Language Models. Ph.d., UC Berkeley, 1994.
20. M. Tomasello. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press, 2003.
21. T. Winograd. Understanding Natural Language. Academic Press, 1972.