Getting what you pay for: The challenge of measuring success in conservation

Animal Conservation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 227-228

  Jones, J P G ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862259378     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: 14691795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00554.x     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L.M., Healey, J.R., Jones, J.P.G., Knight, T.M. & Pullin, A.S. (2012). Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare? Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 29-36.
2. Brooks, J., Franzen, M., Holmes, C., Grote, M. & Borgerhoff-Mulder, M. (2006). Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1528-1538.
3. DEFRA (2012). The Darwin Initiative.
4. Ferraro, P.J. & Pattanayak, S.K. (2006). Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PloS Biol. 4, 482-488.
5. Howe, C. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2012). Evaluating indices of conservation success: a comparative analysis of outcome- and output-based indices. Anim. Conserv. 15, 217-226.
6. Saterson, K., Christensen, N., Jackson, R., Kramer, R., Pimm, S., Smith, M. & Weiner, J. (2004). Disconnects in evaluating the relative effectiveness of conservation strategies. Conserv. Biol. 18, 597-599.
7. Sommerville, M.M., Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Jones, J.P.G. (2011). The challenge of monitoring biodiversity in payment for environmental service interventions. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2832-2841.