Accounting greenhouse gas emissions in the lifecycle of Brazilian sugarcane bioethanol: Methodological references in European and American regulations

Energy Policy

Volumn 47, Issue , 2012, Pages 384-397

  Khatiwada, Dilip ^a,b   Seabra, Joaquim ^b,c   Silveira, Semida ^a   Walter, Arnaldo ^b,c  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b BRAZILIAN CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN ENERGY AND MATERIALS CNPEM   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Regulatory schemes; Sustainability assessment

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; BIO-ENERGY SYSTEMS; CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD; ECONOMIC MODELING; EUROPEAN REGULATION; GHG EMISSION; LAND-USE CHANGE; LOW CARBON; REALISTIC MODELING; REGIONAL MODEL; REGULATORY SCHEMES; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE FUELS; SOIL CARBON; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORT FUEL;

AGRICULTURE; BIOETHANOL; BIOFUELS; ETHANOL; FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOENERGY; EMISSION INVENTORY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ETHANOL; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PARAMETERIZATION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SUGAR CANE; SUSTAINABILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84862258179     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andress D., Nguyen.T.D., Das S. Reducing GHG emissions in the United States' transportation sector. Energy for Sustainable Development 2011, 15(2):117-136.
2. CARB, 2009a. Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard Volume I Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons. California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board. Release Date: March 5, 2009.
3. CARB, 2009b. Staff Report: Detailed California-Modified GREET Pathway for Brazilian Sugar Cane Ethanol, Version 2.2. Stationary Source Division. Release Date: July 20, 2009. Available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/072009lcfs_sugarcane_etoh.pdf.
4. CARB, 2010. Method 2B Pathway: Dehydration of Hydrous Sugarcane Ethanol from Brazil. Trinidad Bulk Traders Ltd. (TBTL). Available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/2a2b/apps/tbtl-sum-ncbi-121410.pdf.
5. Cherubini F., Bird N.D., Cowie A., Jungmeier G., Schlamadinger B., Gallasch S.W. Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2009, 53:434-447.
6. Cherubini F., Stromman A.H. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology 2011, 102:437-451.
7. De Figueiredo, E.B., La Scala Jr., N., 2011. Greenhouse gas balance due to the conversion of sugarcane areas from burned to green harvest in Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 141, 77-85.
8. Denmead O.T., Macdonald B.C.T., Bryant G., Naylor T., Wilson S., Griffith D.W.T., Wang W.J., Salter B., White I., Moody P.W. Emissions of methane and nitrous oxide from Australian sugarcane soils. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 2010, 150:748-756.
9. DfT, 2011a. Department for Transport (DfT), UK. Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RFFO). (Accessed on 30 October 2011). http://www.dft.gov.uk/topics/sustainable/biofuels/rtfo/.
10. DfT, 2011b. Department for Transport (DfT), UK. Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RFFO). Carbon & Sustainability Technical Guidance. Excel Data Sheet for Detailed Carbon Intensity. Available at (Accessed on 30 October 2011). http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110407094507/http:/dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/biofuels/rtfo/.
11. E4Tech, 2010. A Causal Descriptive Approach to Modeling the GHG Emissions Associated with the Indirect Land Use Impacts of Biofuels. Final Report-A Study for the UK Department for Transport. November 2010.
12. EC, 2009a. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/ 30/EC.\
13. EC, 2009b. Directive 2009/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 Amending Directive 98/70/EC as Regards the Specification of Petrol, Diesel and Gas-Oil and Introducing a Mechanism to Monitor and Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Amending Council Directive 1999/32/EC as Regards the Specification of Fuel Used by Inland Waterway Vessels and Repealing Directive 93/12/EEC.
14. EC, 2010. Commission Decision of 10 June 2010 on Guidelines for the Calculation of Land Carbon Stocks for the Purpose of Annex V to Directive 2009/28/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 17.6.2010, L151/19. (Notified under Document C (2010) 3751) (2010/335/EU).
15. EC, 2011. Renewable Energy-Transparency Platform. European Commission (EC)/Energy. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/transparency_platform/transparency_platform_en.htm.
16. EPA, 2010a. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2), Regulatory Impact Analysis. Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transport and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-420-R-10-006, February 2010.
17. EPA, 2010b. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), US. Updated Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2), Final Rule Making (FRM)-Life Cycle Assessment, public docket (RFS2-FRM-LCA-DocketMaterials).
18. EU-JRC, 2008a. European Union-the Joint Research Centre (EU-JRC), the JEC consortium 'biofuels pathway RED method 14Nov2008.xls'.Available at http://biograce.net/content/ghgcalculationtools/methodology.
19. EU-JRC, 2008b. European Union-the Joint Research Centre (EU-JRC). 'The Well-to-wheel Study. WTT Appendix 1'. Well-to-wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Power Trains in the European Context. Well to wheels Report. CONCAWE, EUCAR and JRC. Available at http://biograce.net/content/ghgcalculationtools/methodology.
20. FAPRI, 2011. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI)/ Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD). Iowa State University, US. Detailed information about the model is available at (accessed on October 2011). http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/models/.
21. Fargione J., Hill J., Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthrone P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 2008, 319:1235-1238.
22. Faroni C.E. Sistema radicular de cana-de-açúcar e identificação de raízes metabolicamente ativas. Piracicaba, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Dissertação (mestrado) 2004, 68p [in Portuguese].
23. Franco H.C.J., Bologna I.R., Faroni C.E., Vitti A.C., Trivelin P.C.O. Acúmulo de macronutrients em cana-de-açúcar em função da adubação nitrogenada e dos resíduos culturais incorporados ao solo no plantio. Bragantia: revista de ciĉncias agronÔmicas 2007, 66(4):669-674. [in Portuguese].
24. Fritsche U.R., Sims R.E.H., Montl A. Direct and indirect land-use competition issues for energy crops and their sustainable production-an overview. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2010, 4:692-704.
25. Galdos M.V., Cerri C.C., Cerri C.E.P. Soil carbon stocks under burned and unburned sugarcane in Brazil. Geoderma 2009, 153:347-352.
26. Galdos M.V., Cerri C.C., Lal R., Benoux M., Feigl R., Cerri C.E.P. Net greenhouse gas fluxes in Brazilian ethanol production Systems. GCB Bioenergy 2010, 2:37-44.
27. Gnansounou E., Dauriat A., Villegas J., Panichelli L. Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:4919-4930.
28. GREET, 2011. Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model. Argonne National Laboratory/U.S. Department of Energy. Detailed information about the model is available at (accessed on October2011). http://greet.es.anl.gov/.
29. Hassuani S.J., Leal M.R.L.V., Macedo I.C. Biomass power generation: sugarcane bagasse and trash. Série Caminhos Para Sustentabilidade 2005, PNUD-CTC, Piracicaba.
30. Hoefnagels R., Smeets E., Faaij A. Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 14:1661-1694.
31. ICONE, 2009. Report to the U.S. EPA Regarding the Proposed Changes to the Renewable Fuel Standard Program. Impact on Land Use and GHG Emissions from a Shock on Brazilian Sugarcane Exports to the United States Using the Brazilian Land Use Model (BLUM), Institute for International Trade Negotiations (ICONE).
32. ICONE, 2010. An Allocation Methodology to Assess GHG Emissions Associated with Land Use Change. Final Report (September 2010). Institute for International Trade Negotiations (ICONE), Available at http://www.iconebrasil.org.br/arquivos/noticia/2107.pdf.
33. IEE, 2010a. Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) Project BioGrace. Harmonised Calculations of Biofuel Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe. Detailed information is available at http://www.biograce.net.
34. IEE, 2010b. Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) Project BioGrace. Harmonised Calculations of Biofuel Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe. BioGrace_GHG_calculations_version_4_Public.xls Available at http://biograce.net/content/ghgcalculationtools/excelghgcalculations.
35. IPCC (2006), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds), published: IGES, Japan.
36. Joaquim, A.C., Bertolani, F.C., Donzelli, J.L., Boddey, B.M., 2011. Organic Carbon Stocks in Soils Planted to Sugarcane in the Mid-South Region of Brazil: a Summary of CTC's Data, 1990-2009. Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira (CTC), Piracicaba, São Paulo. Technical Report, September 2011.
37. Khatiwada, D., Seabra, J., Silveira, S., Walter, A. Power Generation from Sugarcane Biomass e A Complementary Option to Hydroelectricity in Nepal and Brazil. Energy (2012), (Article in Press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.015.
38. Khatiwada D., Silveira S. Greenhouse gas balances of molasses based ethanol in Nepal. Journal of Cleaner Production 2011, 19(13):1471-1485.
39. Lange M. The GHG balance of biofuels taking into account land use change. Energy Policy 2011, 39:2373-2385.
40. 2 emission after conventional and reduced tillage of a no-till sugar cane area in southern Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research 2006, 91:244-248.
41. Lisboa C.C., Bahl K.B., Mauder M., Kiese R. Bioethanol production from sugarcane and emissions of greenhouse gases-known and unknowns. Global Carbon Biology (GCB) Bioenergy 2011, 2011. 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01095.x.
42. Liska A.J., Perrin R.K. Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2009, 3.3:318-328.
43. Macedo I.C., Seabra J.E.A., Silva J.E.A.R. Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008, 32(7):582-595.
44. Mathews J.A., Tan H. Biofuels and indirect land use change effects: the debate continues. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2009, 3:305-317.
45. Nassar A.M., Harfuch L., Bachion L.C., Moreira Biofuels and land-use changes: searching for the top model. Interface Focus 2011, 1(2):224-232. 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0043.
46. Nguyen T.L.T., Gheewala S.H., Sagisaka M. Greenhouse gas savings potential of sugar cane bio-energy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010, 18:412-418.
47. NREL, 2011a. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory (NREL). Colorado State University. DAYCENT model. Detailed information about the model is available at (accessed on October 2011). http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/daycent/.
48. NREL, 2011b. Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory (NREL). Colorado State University. CENTURY model. Detailed information about the model is available at (accessed on October 2011). http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/century/.
49. 2 emission in a sugarcane area under green and slash-and-burn managements. Soil and Tillage Research 2009, 105:275-282.
50. PU, 2011. GTAP (Global Trade Analysis Project) Model. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University (PU), US. Detailed information about the model is available at (accessed on October 2011). https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/about/project.asp.
51. REN21, 2011. Renewables 2011. Global Status Report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21th Century (REN2011).
52. RFA, 2008a. Carbon and Sustainability (C&S) Reporting within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation. Technical Guidance Part One. Office of the Renewable Fuels Agency V1.2 August 2008.
53. RFA, 2008b. Carbon and Sustainability Reporting Within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation Technical Guidance Part Two Carbon Reporting-Default Values and Fuel Chains Office of the Renewable Fuels Agency. V1.3. August 2008.
54. RFA, 2011. Building Bridges to a More Sustainable Future. 2011 Ethanol Industry Outlook. Renewable Fuels Association (RFA).
55. RFA, 2011a. Carbon and Sustainability (C&S) Reporting within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation Technical Guidance Part One Renewable Fuels Agency (RFA) Version 4.2 May 2011 Year Four of the RTFO.
56. RFA, 2011b. Carbon and Sustainability (C&S) Reporting within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation. Technical Guidance Part Two Carbon Reporting-Default Values and Fuel Chains. Renewable Fuels Agency (RFA). Version 4.2 May 2011 Year Four of the RTFO.
57. Scarlat N., Dallemand J.F. Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: a global review. Energy Policy 2011, 39(3):1630-1646.
58. Seabra J.E.A., Macedo I., Chum H.L., Sarto C.E.F.C. Life cycle assessment of Brazilian Sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining 2011, 2011(5):519-532.
59. Searchinger T., et al. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008, 319:1238-1240.
60. Smith D.M., Inman-Bamber N.G., Thorburn P.J. Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Research 2005, 92:169-183.
61. Soares, L.H.B., Alves, B.J.R., Urquiaga, S., Boddey, R.M., 2009. Mitigação das Emissões de Gases Efeito Estufa pelo Uso de Etanol da Cana-de-açúcar Produzido no Brasil 'Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by the Use of Ethanol from Sugar Cane Made in Brazil' in Portuguese. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-Embrapa 'Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation' [in Portuguese]. Available at http://www.cnpab.embrapa.br/destaques/mitigacao-etanol.html.
62. Sperling D., Yeh S. Towards a global low carbon fuel standard. Transport Policy 2010, 17:47-49.
63. TAMU, 2011. Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM). Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University (TAMU). Detailed information about the model is available at (accessed on October2011). http://agecon2.tamu.edu/people/faculty/mccarl-bruce/FASOM.html.
64. Timilsina G.R., Shrestha A. How much hope should we have for biofuels?. Energy 2011, 36:2055-2069.
65. UNICA, 2009. Letter to California Air Resources Board about proposed Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association (UNICA). April 16, 2009. Available at http://english.unica.com.br/multimedia/publicacao/Default.asp?sqlPage=1.
66. Whittaker C., McManus M.C., Hammond G.P. Greenhouse gas reporting for biofuels: a comparison between the RED, RTFO and PAS2050 methodologies. Energy Policy 2011, 39:5950-5960.
67. Yeh S., Sperling D. Low carbon fuel standards: implementation scenarios and challenges. Energy Policy 2010, 38(11):6955-6965.