Does climate policy make the EU economy more resilient to oil price rises? A CGE analysis

Energy Policy

Volumn 47, Issue , 2012, Pages 172-179

  Maisonnave, Hélène ^a,b   Pycroft, Jonathan ^b   Saveyn, Bert ^b   Ciscar, Juan Carlos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Computable general equilibrium (CGE); Oil prices

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL COSTS; CLIMATE POLICY; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; EUROPEAN UNION; OIL PRICES; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; TOTAL LOSS;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

COSTS;

COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPEAN UNION; GREENHOUSE GAS; MACROECONOMICS; OIL; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PRICE DYNAMICS;

EUROPE;

EID: 84862250726     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.053     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aleklett K., Hook M., Jakobsson K., Lardelli M., Snowden S., Soderbergh B. The peak of the oil age-analyzing the world oil production reference scenario in world energy outlook 2008. Energy Policy 2010, 38(3):1398-1414.
2. Armington, P.S. (1969) A theory of demand for producers distinguished by place of production. 16, 159-178.IMF Staff Papers.
3. Bernard A., Vielle M. GEMINI-E3, a general equilibrium model of internationalûnational interactions between economy, energy and the environment. Computational Management Science 2008, 5(3):173-206.
4. Ciscar, J.C., Russ, P., Parousos, L., Stroblos, N. (2004). Vulnerability of the EU economy to oil shocks: a general equilibrium analysis with the GEM-E3 model. 13th annual conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
5. Conrad K., Schröder M. Demand for durable and nondurable goods, environmental policy and consumer welfare. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1991, 6(3):271-286.
6. Dissou, Y. (2005) Output-based emissions allowances and the equity-efficiency trade-off. Department of Economics, University of Ottawa.
7. Dissou Y., Robichaud V. ContrÔles des émissions de GES à l'aide d'un système de permis échangeables avec allocation basée sur la production: une analyse en équilibre général dynamique 2003, Ministère des Finances, Canada.
8. E3M Lab GEM-E3 Model Manual 2010, National Technical University of Athens, Greece. http://www.gem-e3.net/.
9. E3M Lab PRIMES Model 2010, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems/National Technical University of Athens, Greece.
10. Ellerman,A.D., P.L. Joskow (2008). The European Union's Emissions Trading System in Perspective Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA.
11. European Commission (2008a). Annex to the impact assessment: document accompanying the package of implementation measures for the EU's objectives on climate change and renewable energy for 2020. Commission Staff Working Document 85, Vol.2.
12. European Commission (2008b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Region-20 20 by 2020-Europe's climate change opportunity. COM(2008) 13 final, COM(2008) 16 final, COM(2008) 17 final, COM(2008) 18 final, COM(2008) 19 final.
13. European Commission (2008c). Impact assessment: document accompanying the package of implementation measures for the EU's objectives on climate change and renewable energy for 2020. Commission Staff Working Document 85.
14. European Commission (2009). Establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, DIRECTIVE 2003/87/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 October 2003, amended by Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009.
15. European Commission (2011a). A roadmap for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050, Comunicación de la Comisión Europea COM(2011) 112/4.
16. European Commission (2011b). A roadmap for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050, Comission Staff Working Document. Impact Assessment COM(2011) 112, SEC(2011) 289.
17. Fischer C. Rebating environmental policy revenues: output-based allocations and tradable performance standards. Resources for the future Discussion Paper 2001, 01:22.
18. Fischer C., Fox A. Output-based allocations of emissions permits. Resources for the future Discussion Paper 2004, 04:37.
19. Hamilton J.D. Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007-08 2009, 15002National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
20. Hirsch R.L., Bezdek R., Wendling R. Peaking of world oil production and its mitigation. AIChE Journal 52,[1] 2006, 2-8.
21. International Energy Agency (2010). World energy outlook: executive summary OECD/ IEA, Paris.
22. International Monetary Fund (2008) World economic outlook: October 2008, Financial stress, downturns and recoveries, Washington DC.
23. Mastrandrea M.D., Schneider S.H. Probabilistic integrated assessment of"dangerous" climate change. Science 2004, 304(5670):571-575. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
24. Rozenberg J., Hallegatte S., Vogt-Schilb A., Sassi O., Guivarch C., Waisman H., Hourcade J.C. Climate policies as a hedge against the uncertainty on future oil supply. Climatic Change Online 2010, 1-6.
25. Russ, P., Wiesenthal, T., Van Regemorter, D., Ciscar, J.C. (2007). Global climate policy scenarios for 2030 and beyond: analysis of greenhouse gas emission reduction pathway scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models. EUR 23032 ENIPTS scientific and technological reports.
26. Saveyn B., Van Regemorter D., Ciscar J.C. Economic analysis of the climate pledges of the Copenhagen Accord for the EU and other major countries. Energy Economics 2011, 33:S33-S40.
27. Stern N.H. The economics of climate change: the Stern review 2007, Cambridge Univ Press.
28. Stone R. Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: an application to the pattern of British. The Economic Journal 1954, Vol. 64(No. 255):511-527. Sep.
29. Toman M.A. International oil security: problems and policies. Brookings Review 20,[2] 2002, 20-23.
30. Turton, H. and L. Barreto (2004) The extended energy-systems ERIS model: an overview, Interim Report IR-04-010, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, February.
31. Turton H., Barreto L. Long-term security of energy supply and climate change. Energy Policy 2006, 34(15):2232-2250.
32. United Nations World population prospects: the 2004 revision. Department of economic and social affairs 2004, Population Division, New York.
33. Vielle M., Viguier L. On the climate change effects of high oil prices. Energy Policy 2007, 35(2):844-849.