Adaptive clinical trials: A partial remedy for the therapeutic misconception?

JAMA

Volumn 307, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 2377-2378

  Meurer, William J ^a   Lewis, Roger J ^b   Berry, Donald A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; INFORMATION LITERACY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SHORT SURVEY; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EQUIPOISE; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; THERAPEUTIC EQUIPOISE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862249598     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.4174     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. Henderson GE, Churchill LR, Davis AM, et al. Clinical trials and medical care: defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Med. 2007;4(11):e324.
2. Kasner SE, Baren JM, Le Roux PD, et al. Community views on neurologic emergency treatment trials. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(4):346-354.
3. Vist GE, Hagen KB, Devereaux PJ, Bryant D, Kristoffersen DT, Oxman AD. Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome. BMJ. 2005;330(7501):1175.
4. Locock L, Smith L. Personal benefit, or benefiting others? deciding whether to take part in clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2011;8(1):85-93.
5. Robinson EJ, Kerr C, Stevens A, Lilford R, Braunholtz D, Edwards S. Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(4):811-824. (Pubitemid 37524003)
6. Berry DA. Adaptive clinical trials: the promise and the caution. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):606-609.
7. Hu F, Rosenberger WF. Optimality, variability, power: evaluating response-adaptive randomization procedures for treatment comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc. 2003;98(463):671-678. (Pubitemid 37395938)
8. Cairns CB, Maier RV, Adeoye O, et al Roundtable External Participants and Roundtable Steering Committee and Federal Participants. NIH Roundtable on Emergency Trauma Research. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(5):538-550.