Funding nature conservation: Who pays?

Animal Conservation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 215-216

  Evans, D M ^a   Barnard, P ^b,c   Koh, L P ^d   Chapman, C A ^e   Altwegg, R ^b,c   Garner, T W J ^f   Gompper, M E ^g   Gordon, I J ^h   Katzner, T E ⁱ   Pettorelli, N ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^h SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862244774     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: 14691795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00550.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (13)

1. Bowles, I., Downs, D., Clark, D. & Guérin-McManus, M. (1998). Economic incentives and legal tools for private sector conservation. Duke Envtl. L. & Policy Forum 8, 209-243.
2. Cadman, M., Petersen, C., Driver, A., Sekhran, N., Maze, K. & Munzhedzi, S. (2010). Biodiversity for development: South Africa's landscape approach to conserving biodiversity and promoting ecosystem resilience. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
3. CBD (2011). Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi targets. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
4. Donald, P.F., Green, R.E. & Heath, M.F. (2001). Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 268, 25-29.
5. Donald, P.F., Sanderson, F.J., Burfield, I.J. & van Bommel, F.P.J. (2006). Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990-2000. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116, 189-196.
6. Ebeling, J. & Yasue, M. (2008). Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 363, 1917-1924.
7. EU (2012). Financial management in the European Union. London: National Audit Office.
8. Kleijn, D., Baquero, R.A., Clough, Y., Diaz, M., De Esteban, J., Fernandez, F., Gabriel, D., Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Johl, R., Knop, E., Kruess, A., Marshall, E.J.P., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., Verhulst, J., West, T.M. & Yela, J.L. (2006). Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol. Lett. 9, 243-254.
9. Ledford, H. (2012). Alternative funding: sponsor my science. Nature 481, 254-255.
10. MACC (2012). Marginal abatement cost curves - MACCs. London: Enerdata.
11. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity sythesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
12. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2009). Biodiversity, development and poverty alleviation: recognizing the role of biodiversity for human well-being. Montreal: Convention on Biological Diversity.
13. TEEB (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press.