Comparing the association of GFR estimated by the CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations and mortality: The third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III)

BMC Nephrology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Shafi, Tariq ^a,b   Matsushita, Kunihiro ^b,c   Selvin, Elizabeth ^b,c   Sang, Yingying ^b,c   Astor, Brad C ^d   Inker, Lesley A ^e   Coresh, Josef ^b,c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Epidemiology; Glomerular filtration rate; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE EPIDEMIOLOGY COLLABORATION EQUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MODIFICATION OF DIET IN RENAL DISEASE STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PREVALENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NUTRITION SURVEYS; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84862233020     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-42     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Am J Kidney Dis 2010 55 4 622 627 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.02.337 20338463
2. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, et al. Ann Intern Med 2009 150 9 604 612 19414839
3. Risk implications of the new CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation compared with the MDRD Study equation for estimated GFR: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Matsushita K, Selvin E, Bash LD, Astor BC, Coresh J, Am J Kidney Dis 2010 55 4 648 659 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009. 12.016 20189275
4. Comparison of the prevalence and mortality risk of CKD in Australia using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study GFR estimating equations: the AusDiab (Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle) Study. White SL, Polkinghorne KR, Atkins RC, Chadban SJ, Am J Kidney Dis 2010 55 4 660 670 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.011 20138414
5. Prognostic assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate by the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation in comparison with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation. Skali H, Uno H, Levey AS, Inker LA, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, Am Heart J 2011 162 3 548 554 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.06.006 21884875
6. Comparison of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equations: risk factors for and complications of CKD and mortality in the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Stevens LA, Li S, Kurella Tamura M, Chen SC, Vassalotti JA, Norris KC, Whaley-Connell AT, Bakris GL, McCullough PA, Am J Kidney Dis 2011 57 3 Suppl 2 9 S16 21338849
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville [ http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nh3data.htm]. Last accessed May 16, 2012
8. Calibration of serum creatinine in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 1988-1994, 1999-2004. Selvin E, Manzi J, Stevens LA, Van Lente F, Lacher DA, Levey AS, Coresh J, Am J Kidney Dis 2007 50 6 918 926 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.08.020 18037092 (Pubitemid 350122815)
9. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999 130 6 461 470 (Pubitemid 29135798)
10. National Center for Health Statistics, Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, Public-use Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Linked Mortality File, Hyattsville 2010 [Available at the following address: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-access/data-linkage/mortality/nhanes3-linkage- public-use.htm ]
11. National Center for Health Statistics, Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) Linked Mortality File, Mortality follow-up through 2006 Matching Methodology May 2009, Hyattsville 2006 Available at the following address: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/datalinkage/matching-methodology-nhanes3-final.pdf. Last accessed May 16, 2012
12. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Stat Med 2008 27 2 157 172 discussion 207-112 10.1002/sim.2929 17569110 (Pubitemid 351193639)
13. Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60mL/min/1.73m2. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Zhang YL, Beck GJ, Froissart M, Hamm LL, Lewis JB, Mauer M, Navis GJ, et al. Am J Kidney Dis 2010 56 3 486 495 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.026 20557989
14. When is a new prediction marker useful? A consideration of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and C-reactive protein for stroke risk. Greenland P, O'Malley PG, Arch Intern Med 2005 165 21 2454 2456 10.1001/archinte.165.21.2454 16314539 (Pubitemid 41720004)
15. Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P, Am J Epidemiol 2004 159 9 882 890 10.1093/aje/kwh101 15105181 (Pubitemid 38657490)
16. The limitations of risk factors as prognostic tools. Ware JH, N Engl J Med 2006 355 25 2615 2617 10.1056/NEJMp068249 17182986 (Pubitemid 44969120)