The negative consequences of uncivil political discourse

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 405-411

  Maisel, L Sandy ^a  

^a Colby College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862226668     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: 15375935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096512000467     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Allen, Jonathan. 2012. "Being in Congress Loses Its Thrill for Some Lawmakers." Politico, March 7, accessed March 7, 2012.
2. Barber, Benjamin. 1999. "Deliberation, Democracy, and Power," Kettering Review 17 (1).
3. Bryce, James. 1919. The American Commonwealth, Vol. II. New York: Macmillan.
4. Center for Civil Discourse. 2011. Proposal for a National Forum on Civility in American Democracy, submitted to the National Endowment for the Humanities by the the McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.
5. Dawson, Matthew Q. 2000. Partisanship and the Birth of America's Second Party, 1796-1800: Stop the Wheels of Government.Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
6. Etzioni, Amitai. 1993. Public Policy in a New Key. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7. Fishkin, James S. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. -. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Herbst, Susan. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
12. Keller, Bill. 2011. "Asking Candidates Tougher Questions about Faith," New York Times Magazine, August 28.
13. Maestas, Cherie D., Sarah A. Fulton, L. Sandy Maisel, andWalter J. Stone. 2006. "When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House." American Political Science Review 100 (2): 195-208.
14. Maisel, L. Sandy, Cherie D. Maestas, andWalter J. Stone. 2005. "The Impact of Redistricting on Candidate Emergence." In Party Lines: Competition, Partisanship, and Congressional Redistricting.ed. Thomas E. Mann and Bruce E. Cain.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15. Polsby, NelsonW. 1970. "The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives." American Political Science Review 62 (1): 144-68.
16. Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Shuster.
17. Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Rovere, Richard H. 1959 (reprint 1996). Senator Joe McCarthy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
19. Saudi Gazette. 2011. "Incivility Marks Republican Presidential Debate in Iowa," August 13.
20. Stone,Walter J., and L. Sandy Maisel. 2003. "The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates' Nomination and General Election Chances." Journal of Politics 65 (4): 951-77.
21. Stone,Walter J., L. Sandy Maisel, and Trevor C. Lowman. 2012. "Boehner's Dilemma." In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns, 5th edition.ed. Mark D. Brewer and L. Sandy Maisel. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22. Sunstein, Cass R. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Zeleny, Jeff, and Ashley Parker. 2011. "8 From G.O.P. Trade Attacks at Iowa Debate," New York Times, August 11.
24. Zengerle, Jason. 2011. "Éric Cantor's America." New York, October 2.