Comprehensive proteome analysis in Cenococcum geophilum Fr. as a tool to discover drought-related proteins

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 75, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3707-3719

  Kerner, René ^a,b   Delgado Eckert, Edgar ^c   Del Castillo, Estela ^a   Müller Starck, Gerhard ^a   Peter, Martina ^d   Kuster, Bernhard ^a,e   Tisserant, Emilie ^f   Pritsch, Karin ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^e Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Abiotic stress; Cenococcum geophilum; Drought; Fungal proteomics

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

ARTICLE; CENOCOCCUM GEOPHILUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROUGHT STRESS; ECTOMYCORRHIZA; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; FUNGAL CELL; FUNGAL METABOLISM; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; MYCELIUM; NONHUMAN; OSMOTIC STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; TREE; WATER DEPRIVATION;

ASCOMYCOTA; DROUGHTS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE; PROTEOME;

CENOCOCCUM GEOPHILUM; FUNGI;

EID: 84862222448     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.039     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Trappe J.M. Mycorrhizal hosts and distribution of Cenococcum graniforme. Lloydia 1964, 27:100-107.
2. LoBuglio K.F., Berbee M.L., Taylor J.W. Phylogenetic origins of the asexual mycorrhizal symbiont Cenococcum geophilum Fr. and other mycorrhizal fungi among the Ascomycetes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1996, 6:287-294.
3. Panaccione D.G., Sheets N.L., Miller S.P., Cumming J.R. Diversity of Cenococcum geophilum isolates from serpentine and non-serpentine soils. Mycologia 2001, 93:645-652.
4. Jany J.-L., Garbaye J., Martin F. Cenococcum geophilum populations show a high degree of genetic diversity in beech forests. New Phytol 2002, 154:651-659.
5. Wu B., Nara K., Hogetsu T. Genetic structure of Cenococcum geophilum populations in primary successional volcanic deserts on Mount Fuji as revealed by microsatellite markers. New Phytol 2005, 165:285-293.
6. Coleman M., Bledsoe C., Lopushinsky W. Pure culture response of ectomycorrhizal fungi to imposed water stress. Can J Bot 1989, 67:29-39.
7. Marschner H., Dell B. Nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Soil 1994, 159:89-102.
8. Theodorou C. Soil moisture and the mycorrhizal association of Pinus radiata D. don. Soil Biol Biochem 1978, 10:33-37.
9. Mexal J., Reid C. The growth of selected mycorrhizal fungi in response to induced water stress. Can J Bot 1973, 51:1579-1588.
10. Douhan G., Martin D., Rizzo D. Using the putative asexual fungus Cenococcum geophilum as a model to test how species concepts influence recombination analyses using sequence data from multiple loci. Curr Genet 2007, 52:191-201.
11. Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) http://www.ipcc.ch.
12. Martin F., Cullen D., Hibbett D., Pisabarro A., Spatafora J.W., Baker S.E., et al. Sequencing the fungal tree of life. New Phytol 2011, 190:818-821.
13. White B.A. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A guide to methods and applications 1990, 315-322. Academic Press, New York. M.A. Innis (Ed.).
14. Trappe J.M. Cenococcum graniforme: Its distribution, ecology, ectotrophic mycorrhiza formation, and inherent variation. Ninety-two hosts reported for the 1st time 1963, University of Washingtong, Washingtong.
15. Shevchenko A., Wilm M., Vorm O., Mann M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 1996, 68:850-858.
16. Liu H., Sadygov R.G., Yates J.R. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004, 76:4193-4201.
17. Paoletti A.C., Parmely T.J., Tomomori-Sato C., Sato S., Zhu D., Conaway R.C., et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of distinct mammalian mediator complexes using normalized spectral abundance factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006, 103:18928-18933.
18. Zybailov B., Mosley A.L., Sardiu M.E., Coleman M.K., Florens L., Washburn M.P. Statistical analysis of membrane proteome expression changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:2339-2347.
19. Pavelka N., Fournier M.L., Swanson S.K., Pelizzola M., Ricciardi-Castagnoli P., Florens L., et al. Statistical similarities between transcriptomics and quantitative shotgun proteomics data. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:631-644.
20. Reumann S., Quan S., Aung K., Yang P., Manandhar-Shrestha K., Holbrook D., et al. In-depth proteome analysis of Arabidopsis leaf peroxisomes combined with in vivo subcellular targeting verification indicates novel metabolic and regulatory functions of peroxisomes. Plant Physiol 2009, 150:125-143.
21. Lidstone G. Note on the general case of the Bayes-Laplace formula for inductive or a posteriori probabilities. Trans Fac Actuaries 1920, 8:182-192.
22. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat 2000, 25:60-83.
23. Levine R.L., Williams J.A., Stadtman E.R., Shacter E. Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol 1994, 233:346-357.
24. Vodisch M., Albrecht D., Lessing F., Schmidt A.D., Winkler R., Guthke R., et al. Two-dimensional proteome reference maps for the human pathogenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Proteomics 2009, 9:1407-1415.
25. Larsen M.R., Trelle M.B., Thingholm T.E., Jensen O.N. Analysis of posttranslational modifications of proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Biotechniques 2006, 40:790-798.
26. Rao P.V., Reddy A.P., Lu X., Dasari S., Krishnaprasad A., Biggs E., et al. Proteomic identification of salivary biomarkers of type-2 diabetes. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:239-245.
27. Futcher B., Latter G.I., Monardo P., McLaughlin C.S., Garrels J.I. A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:7357-7368.
28. Müller J., Boller T., Wiemken A. Trehalose becomes the most abundant non structural carbohydrate during senescence of soybean nodules. J Exp Bot 2001, 52:943-947.
29. Crowe J.H., Hoekstra F.A., Crowe L.M. Anhydrobiosis 1992.
30. Iordachescu M., Imai R. Trehalose biosynthesis in response to abiotic stresses. J Integr Plant Biol 2008, 50:1223-1229.
31. Shi L.B., Guttenberger M., Kottke I., Hampp R. The effect of drought on mycorrhizas of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.): Changes in community structure, and the content of carbohydrates and nitrogen storage bodies of the fungi. Mycorrhiza 2002, 12:303-311.
32. Bartels D., Sunkar R. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2005, 24:23-58.
33. Nio S.A., Cawthray G.R., Wade L.J., Colmer T.D. Pattern of solutes accumulated during leaf osmotic adjustment as related to duration of water deficit for wheat at the reproductive stage. Plant Physiol Biochem 2011, 49:1126-1137.
34. Samali A., Orrenius S. Heat shock proteins: regulators of stress response and apoptosis. Cell Stress Chaperones 1998, 3:228-236.
35. Baldrian P. Fungal laccases - occurrence and properties. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2006, 30:215-242.
36. Oliveira E., Amara I., Bellido D., Odena M.A., Domínguez E., Pagès M., et al. LC-MSMS identification of Arabidopsis thaliana heat-stable seed proteins: Enriching for LEA-type proteins by acid treatment. J Mass Spectrom 2007, 42:1485-1495.
37. Garay-Arroyo A., Colmenero-Flores J.M., Garciarrubio A., Covarrubias A.A. Highly hydrophilic proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes are common during conditions of water deficit. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:5668-5674.
38. Solomon A., Salomon R., Paperna I., Glazer I. Desiccation stress of entomopathogenic nematodes induces the accumulation of a novel heat-stable protein. Parasitology 2000, 121:409-416.
39. Abba S., Ghignone S., Bonfante P. A dehydration-inducible gene in the truffle Tuber borchii identifies a novel group of dehydrins. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:39.
40. Mtwisha L., Brandt W., McCready S., Lindsey G.G. Hsp 12 is a LEA-like protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Mol Biol 1998, 37:513-521.
41. Close T.J. Dehydrins: Emergence of a biochemical role of a family of plant dehydration proteins. Physiol Plant 1996, 97:795-803.
42. Boucher V., Buitink J., Lin X., Boudet J., Hoekstra F.A., Hundertmark M., et al. MtPM25 is an atypical hydrophobic late embryogenesis-abundant protein that dissociates cold and desiccation-aggregated proteins. Plant Cell Environ 2010, 33:418-430.
43. Kovacs D., Kalmar E., Torok Z., Tompa P. Chaperone activity of ERD10 and ERD14, two disordered stress-related plant proteins. Plant Physiol 2008, 147:381-390.
44. Heyen B.J., Alsheikh M.K., Smith E.A., Torvik C.F., Seals D.F., Randall S.K. The calcium-binding activity of a vacuole-associated, dehydrin-like protein is regulated by phosphorylation. Plant Physiol 2002, 130:675-687.
45. Xiong L., Schumaker K.S., Zhu J.-K. Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell Online 2002, 14:S165-S183.
46. Tomkinson A.E., Bardwell A.J., Bardwell L., Tappe N.J., Friedberg E.C. Yeast DNA repair and recombination proteins Rad1 and Rad1O constitute a single-stranded-DNA endonuclease. Nature 1993, 362:860-862.
47. Sunkar R., Bartels D., Kirch H.-H. Overexpression of a stress-inducible aldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana in transgenic plants improves stress tolerance. Plant J 2003, 35:452-464.
48. Seki M., Narusaka M., Ishida J., Nanjo T., Fujita M., Oono Y., et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 2002, 31:279-292.
49. Chen S., Polle A. Salinity tolerance of Populus. Plant Biol 2010, 12:317-333.
50. Guo P., Baum M., Grando S., Ceccarelli S., Bai G., Li R., et al. Differentially expressed genes between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive barley genotypes in response to drought stress during the reproductive stage. J Exp Bot 2009, 60:3531-3544.
51. Andersen K., Semple C., Hartmann-Petersen R. Characterisation of the nascent polypeptide-associated complex in fission yeast. Mol Biol Rep 2007, 34:275-281.
52. Beatrix B., Sakai H., Wiedmann M. The α and β subunit of the nascent polypeptide-associated complex have distinct functions. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:37838-37845.
53. Yan S.P., Tang Z.C., Su W., Sun W.N. Proteornic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics 2005, 5:235-244.
54. Finnie C. Plant proteomics 2006, Blackwell, Oxford.
55. Hoekstra F.A., Golovina E.A., Buitink J. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 2001, 6:431-438.
56. Ocón A., Hampp R., Requena N. Trehalose turnover during abiotic stress in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 2007, 174:879-891.
57. Browne J.A., Dolan K.M., Tyson T., Goyal K., Tunnacliffe A., Burnell A.M. Dehydration-specific induction of hydrophilic protein genes in the anhydrobiotic nematode Aphelenchus avenae. Eukaryot Cell 2004, 3:966-975.
58. Grennan A.K. The role of trehalose biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol 2007, 144:3-5.
59. Zhang J., Klueva N., Wang Z., Wu R., Ho T.-H., Nguyen H. Genetic engineering for abiotic stress resistance in crop plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 2000, 36:108-114.
60. Rodríguez-Salazar J., Suárez R., Caballero-Mellado J., Iturriaga G. Trehalose accumulation in Azospirillum brasilense improves drought tolerance and biomass in maize plants. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009, 296:52-59.
61. Schellenbaum L., Muller J., Boller T., Wiemken A., Schuepp H. Effects of drought on non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal maize: Changes in the pools of non-structural carbohydrates, in the activities of invertase and trehalase, and in the pools of amino acids and imino acids. New Phytol 1998, 138:59-66.
62. Jetten M.S., Gubler M.E., Lee S.H., Sinskey A.J. Structural and functional analysis of pyruvate kinase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994, 60:2501-2507.
63. Sawada K., Zen-in S., Wada M., Yokota A. Metabolic changes in a pyruvate kinase gene deletion mutant of Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032. Metab Eng 2010, 12:401-407.
64. 2 fixation. Physiol Plant 1996, 96:699-705.
65. Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot 2007, 58:221-227.
66. Zhu J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2002, 53:247-273.
67. Xu G., Li C.Y., Yao Y.N. Proteomics analysis of drought stress-responsive proteins in Hippophae rhamnoides L. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2009, 27:153-161.
68. Shi S.Q., Shi Z., Qi L.W., Sun X.M., Jiang Z.P., Li C.X., et al. Molecular responses and expression analysis of genes in a xerophytic desert shrub Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae) to environmental stresses. Afr J Biotechnol 2009, 8:2667-2676.
69. Tattini M., Galardi C., Pinelli P., Massai R., Remorini D., Agati G. Differential accumulation of flavonoids and hydroxycinnamates in leaves of Ligustrum vulgare under excess light and drought stress. New Phytol 2004, 163:547-561.